Volume 130, Issue 3 pp. 419-427
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer is associated with better outcomes than neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Hideo Takahashi MD

Corresponding Author

Hideo Takahashi MD

Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, New York, USA

Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA

Correspondence Hideo Takahashi, MD, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, South Central Ave, Valley Stream, NY 11580, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Masaya Nakauchi MD, PhD

Masaya Nakauchi MD, PhD

Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Spiros Hiotis MD, PhD

Spiros Hiotis MD, PhD

Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Rajiv Datta MD, MBA

Rajiv Datta MD, MBA

Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 July 2024
Citations: 1

Abstract

Introduction

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) or chemoradiation (CRTx) for advanced resectable gastric cancer, irrespective of the tumor location. The aim of this study is to compare survival benefits between neoadjuvant CTx and CRTx using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Methods

Using the NCDB, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent gastrectomy after neoadjuvant CRTx or CTx between 2004 and 2018.

Results

The cohort included 14 266 patients, with 6458 (45.3%) receiving neoadjuvant CTx and 7808 (54.7%) receiving neoadjuvant CRTx. Both treatment groups exhibited significant differences in various demographic and clinical factors, including sex, age, race, tumor locations, stages, and adjuvant treatment (all p < 0.001). While the complete pathological response was more prevalent in the CRTx group (p < 0.001), overall survival (OS) was significantly extended in the CTx group (p < 0.001). Subgroup survival analyses, accounting for tumor location and clinical/pathological stage, consistently revealed longer OS in the CTx group (p < 0.001). The direct comparison showed an approximately 20%−30% improved 5-year OS in the CTx group across the majority of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T/N category tables. Multivariate analysis confirmed neoadjuvant CTx was an independent protective factor (hazard ratio = 0.811; p < 0.001). A nomogram for OS based on multivariate analysis was also proposed, revealing a significant improvement in the c-index compared to the current AJCC staging (0.654 vs. 0.596).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant CRTx demonstrated significantly shorter survival compared to patients undergoing CTx at the same stage. The current AJCC staging may lead to an overestimation of survival in patients with neoadjuvant CRTx.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in NCDB at https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer-programs/national-cancer-database/puf/.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.