Volume 127, Issue 5 pp. 782-790
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An updated systematic review of esthetic grading tools in postmastectomy breast reconstruction

Carrie Stern MD

Corresponding Author

Carrie Stern MD

Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence Carrie Stern, MD, Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA. 

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Leslie N. Kim MD

Leslie N. Kim MD

Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ethan Plotsker BA

Ethan Plotsker BA

Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lindsay Boyce MLIS

Lindsay Boyce MLIS

Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph Dayan MD

Joseph Dayan MD

Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonas A. Nelson MD, MPH

Jonas A. Nelson MD, MPH

Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 January 2023
Citations: 1

Carrie Stern and Leslie N. Kim contributed equally and should be viewed as cofirst authors.

Abstract

Background and Objectives

We ascertained whether a validated esthetic grading tool for breast reconstruction had been developed and widely adopted since the last published systematic review on the topic from 2015.

Methods

We performed a systematic review identifying all studies using a grading tool to assess breast reconstruction, using search terms associated with all types of breast surgery and outcomes research. Articles were assessed for patient number, validated scale use, assessor type and training, assessor blinding, assessment method, scoring system type, type and timing of reconstruction, and usage of corroborating scales.

Results

Of 2809 articles screened, 148 met the criteria. Only 3 used a validated tool, the Esthetic Items Scale. Most used study-only tools (n = 111) or unvalidated tools (n = 28). The most used unvalidated tool was the Garbay/Lowery 5-subscale rubric. Unanchored Likert scales were the most common subjective tool; two-dimensional images were the most used medium. Surgeons, patients, and nurses were the most common assessors. Twenty percent of studies used corroborating scales.

Conclusions

In the absence of a validated esthetic grading tool for breast reconstruction, researchers continue to rely on unvalidated scales. The only validated scale available is used infrequently and only validated among physicians. A validated, reliable, simple grading tool with clinical and scholastic relevance is needed.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Joseph Dayan, MD, is a paid consultant for Stryker and the Director of Welwaze Medical Corporation. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The author has provided the required Data Availability Statement, and if applicable, included functional and accurate links to said data therein. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.