Volume 125, Issue 4 pp. 589-595
BREAST

Lapses in breast cancer screening for highly penetrant mutation carriers during pregnancy and lactation

Anna Chichura MD

Corresponding Author

Anna Chichura MD

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Obstetrics, Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Department of Surgery, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Correspondence Anna Chichura, MD, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan Hunt MD

Jonathan Hunt MD

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Obstetrics, Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Julie Lang MD

Julie Lang MD

Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Holly Pederson MD

Holly Pederson MD

Breast Center, Departments of General Surgery and Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 December 2021

These findings were presented virtually at the eighth International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (BRCA 2021) in May 2021.

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Screening for breast cancer in highly penetrant mutation carriers during pregnancy and lactation is challenging and consensus guidelines are lacking. This study evaluates the lapse in screening and the interval pregnancy-associated breast cancer rate.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective cohort study of pregnant and lactating patients with known pathogenic germline mutations was performed. Lapse in screening was defined as the interval between the last screening imaging exam obtained before last menstrual period and the subsequent screening imaging.

Results

Out of 685 patients, 42 had 1–3 evaluable pregnancies (54 total – 28 managed in High Risk Breast Clinic and 26 by OB/GYN). Mutations were observed in patients in BRCA1 (49%), BRCA2 (36%), CDH1 (5%), CHEK2 (2%), ATM (2%), NF1 (3%), and MSH2 (3%). The average screening lapse was 25 [19, 30] months for patients followed in the High Risk Clinic versus 32.5 [21, 65.75] months for patients followed with Routine Care (p = 0.035). We identified three cases of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (interval cancer rate 6%).

Conclusions

Patients with highly penetrant mutations are at risk for the development of interval pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Development of consistent screening guidelines and adherence to those guidelines is needed for this patient population.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.