Minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery: The ideal combination?
Basile Pache MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Hübner MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorJonas Jurt MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nicolas Demartines MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Correspondence
Prof. Nicolas Demartines, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFabian Grass MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorBasile Pache MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Hübner MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorJonas Jurt MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nicolas Demartines MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Correspondence
Prof. Nicolas Demartines, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFabian Grass MD
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and minimally invasive surgery are both in the limelight due to their potential positive effects on surgical outcome. Large randomized trials and meta-analyses validated the use of both, laparoscopy and ERAS protocol, as individual measures. A synergistic effect of both entities might contribute to even better outcomes. This review hence assessed the literature upon up-to-date studies combining both methods.
REFERENCES
- 1 Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001; 5: 89–94.
- 2 Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1: 144–150.
- 3 Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10: 15–18.
- 4 Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 1111–1124.
- 5 Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the uk mrc clasicc trial group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3061–3068.
- 6 Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 1324–1332.
- 7 AC Currie, G Malietzis, JT Jenkins, et al. Network meta-analysis of protocol-driven care and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2016; 103: 1783–1794
- 8 Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 921–928.
- 9 Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 477–484.
- 10 Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ, Rockall TA. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52: 1239–1243.
- 11 van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 210–218.
- 12 Jackson TD, Kaplan GG, Arena G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 439–446.
- 13 Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 4:CD005200.
- 14 Ma Y, Yang Z, Qin H, Wang Y. A meta-analysis of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. Med Oncol. 2011; 28: 925–933.
- 15 Xie M, Qin H, Luo Q, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarian patients: is it safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94: e1765.
- 16 Slieker J, Frauche P, Jurt J, et al. Enhanced recovery ERAS for elderly: a safe and beneficial pathway in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017; 32: 215–221.
- 17 Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, et al. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995; 345: 763–764.
- 18 Kehlet H, Rung GW, Callesen T. Postoperative opioid analgesia: time for a reconsideration? J Clin Anesth. 1996; 8: 441–445.
- 19 Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg. 1999; 86: 227–230.
- 20 Brodner G, Van Aken H, Hertle L et al. Multimodal perioperative management-combining thoracic epidural analgesia, forced mobilization, and oral nutrition-reduces hormonal and metabolic stress and improves convalescence after major urologic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92: 1594–1600.
- 21 Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg. 2002; 89: 446–453.
- 22 Firoozfard B, Christensen T, Kristensen JK, et al. Fast-track open transperitoneal nephrectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003; 37: 305–308.
- 23 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013; 37: 259–284.
- 24 Melloul E, Hubner M, Scott M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016; 40: 2425–2440.
- 25 Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, et al. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) society recommendations-Part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 140: 313–322.
- 26 Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014; 38: 1531–1541.
- 27 Kehlet H. The surgical stress response: should it be prevented? Can J Surg. 1991; 34: 565–567.
- 28 Scott MJ, Baldini G, Fearon KC, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: pathophysiological considerations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015; 59: 1212–1231.
- 29 Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997; 78: 606–617.
- 30 Kehlet H, Holte K. Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg. 2001; 182: 3S–10S.
- 31 Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 216–221.
- 32 Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 3443–3453.
- 33 Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011; 254: 868–875.
- 34 Labgaa I, Jarrar G, Joliat GR, et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery has a positive impact on non-ERAS liver surgery patients. World J Surg. 2016; 40: 1082–1091.
- 35 Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 1804–1811.
- 36 Esteban F, Cerdan FJ, Garcia-Alonso M, et al. A multicentre comparison of a fast track or conventional postoperative protocol following laparoscopic or open elective surgery for colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16: 134–140.
- 37 Tiefenthal M, Asklid D, Hjern F, et al. Laparoscopic and open right-sided colonic resection in daily routine practice. A prospective multicentre study within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. Colorectal Dis. 2016; 18: 187–194.
- 38 Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, et al. Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 416–423.
- 39 Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T, et al. A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15: 1375–1385.
- 40 Zhao JH, Sun JX, Huang XZ, et al. Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast track surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016; 31: 613–622.
- 41 Jurt J, Slieker J, Frauche P, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: can we rely on the key factors or do we need the Bel Ensemble? World J Surg. 2017. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4054-z
- 42 Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, et al. Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011; 146: 571–577.
- 43 Pedziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Kisielewski M, et al. Is ERAS in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer changing risk factors for delayed recovery? Med Oncol. 2016; 33:25.