Volume 114, Issue 5 pp. 533-536
Research Article

Atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast has similar prognostic factors and survival to typical medullary breast carcinoma: 3,976 cases from the National Cancer Data Base

Alina M. Mateo MD

Corresponding Author

Alina M. Mateo MD

Department of Surgery, Abington Hospital—Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania

Correspondence to: Alina M. Mateo, MD, Department of Surgery, Abington Hospital—Jefferson Health, 1245 Highland Avenue, Suite 604, Abington 19001, PA. Fax: 215-481-2159. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Todd A. Pezzi BS

Todd A. Pezzi BS

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Sundermeyer MD

Mark Sundermeyer MD

Department of Medicine, Abington Hospital—Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Cynthia A. Kelley MD

Cynthia A. Kelley MD

Department of Pathology, Abington Hospital—Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Vicki S. Klimberg MD

Vicki S. Klimberg MD

Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher M. Pezzi MD

Christopher M. Pezzi MD

Department of Surgery, Abington Hospital—Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 July 2016
Citations: 10

Abstract

Backgrounds and Objectives

Medullary breast carcinoma (MBC) is a subtype with a more favorable prognosis. Tumors with some, but not all, characteristics of MBC are classified as atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast (AMCB).

Methods

Patients with invasive MBC and AMCB reported to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2004 to 2013 were compared for tumor characteristics and overall survival, using infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) as a reference.

Results

Patients with MBC (n = 3,688), AMCB (n = 288), and IDC (n = 918,870) met inclusion criteria. Comparing MBC with AMCB, the mean age at diagnosis (52.9 vs. 53.9 years), mean tumor size (2.4 vs. 2.5 cm), lymph node positivity (22.8% vs. 22.4%), estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (22% vs. 25%), progesterone receptor (PR) positivity (14% vs. 15%), HER2 positivity (11% vs. 14%), rate of breast conserving surgery (67% vs. 68%), use of chemotherapy (76% vs. 75%), and use of hormonal therapy (19% vs. 18%), respectively, were not clinically or statistically different. Five-year (92% vs. 89%) and 10-year survival rates (85% vs. 87%) were not significantly different (P = 0.46).

Conclusions

There does not appear to be any reason to differentiate between AMCB and MBC given the similarities in presentation, treatment and prognosis. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:533–536. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.