Volume 109, Issue 7 pp. 708-713
Research Article

Treatment strategy of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

Heli Liu MD

Heli Liu MD

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhongshu Yan MD

Corresponding Author

Zhongshu Yan MD

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China

Correspondence to: Zhongshu Yan, MD, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P.R. China. Fax: +86-731-84327332. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Guoqing Liao MD

Guoqing Liao MD

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Hongling Yin PhD

Hongling Yin PhD

Department of Pathology, Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 February 2014
Citations: 41
The authors declared that there is no conflict related to this study.

Abstract

Background

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare entity. A retrospective analysis of outcomes from a single institution to identify treatment strategies associated with improved outcomes.

Methods

Records of patients with GIST of the rectum were retrospectively reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and outcome were evaluated.

Results

Compared with the trans-abdominal approach group, the local excision group patients had smaller size and lower location tumors (P < 0.05). Positive resection margin was an important hazard factor for DFS (OR, 7.63; P = 0.015). Among the patients with the tumor size >5 cm, those with preoperative Imatinib therapy had higher rate of a negative resection margin than those without (100% vs. 20%, P = 0.048). Among the patients with intermediate and high-risk tumors, those who received peri-operative Imatinib therapy had longer DFS compared with those without (61.3 ± 6.1 months vs. 20.2 ± 4.4 months, P = 0.030).

Conclusions

The location of rectal GIST impacts the choice of resection type. Most patients with tumors within 5 cm of the anal verge can be treated with local excision. Positive resection margin is the independent hazard factor for poorer survival. Peri-operative Imatinib therapy is associated with a prolonged DFS in patients with intermediate and high-risk tumors. J. Surg. Oncol 2014; 109:708–713. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.