Volume 40, Issue 1 pp. 74-86
SPECIAL ISSUE RESEARCH ARTICLE
Free Access

Relationship between altered knee kinematics and subchondral bone remodeling in a clinically translational model of ACL injury

McKenzie S. White

McKenzie S. White

School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ross J. Brancati

Ross J. Brancati

School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lindsey K. Lepley

Corresponding Author

Lindsey K. Lepley

School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence Lindsey K. Lepley, University of Michigan, 830 N. University Ave., Office 1225, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 December 2020
Citations: 12

Abstract

Abnormal joint kinematics are commonly reported in the acute and chronic stages of recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and have long been mechanistically implicated as a primary driver in the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Though strongly theorized, it is unclear to what extent biomechanical adaptations after ACL injury culminate in the development of PTOA, as data that directly connects these factors does not exist. Using a preclinical, noninvasive ACL injury rodent model, our objective was to explore the direct effect of an isolated ACL injury on joint kinematics and the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the development of PTOA. A total of 32, 16-week-old Long-Evans rats were exposed to a noninvasive ACL injury. Marker-less deep learning software (DeepLabCut) was used to track animal movement for sagittal-plane kinematic analyses and micro computed tomography was used to evaluate subchondral bone architecture at days 7, 14, 28, and 56 following injury. There was a significant decrease in peak knee flexion during walking (p < .05), which had a moderate-to-strong negative correlation (r = −.59 to −.71; p < .001) with subchondral bone plate porosity in all load bearing regions of the femur and tibia. Additional comprehensive analyses of knee flexion profiles revealed dramatic alterations throughout the step cycle. This occurred alongside considerable loss of epiphyseal trabecular bone and substantial changes in anatomical orientation. Knee flexion angle and subchondral bone microarchitecture are severely impacted after ACL injury. Reductions in peak knee flexion angle after ACL injury are directly associated with subchondral bone plate remodeling.

1 INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a debilitating condition that accelerates the onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), a disease plaguing more than 50% of ACL injured patients.1 While most patients opt to receive surgical reconstruction, restabilizing the joint has been largely unsuccessful at reducing the risk of developing PTOA.2 Abnormal joint kinetic and kinematics are commonly reported in the acute and chronic stages of recovery3, 4 and have long been mechanistically implicated as a primary driver of PTOA onset.5 These biomechanical adaptations are thought to cause a nonuniform redistribution of mechanical load on articular cartilage,5 which can lead to degenerative joint changes (identified by superficial fraying or splitting of cartilage and maladaptive subchondral bone architecture) associated with PTOA onset. Though strongly theorized,5 it is unclear to what extent biomechanical adaptations after ACL injury culminate in the development of PTOA, as data that directly connects these factors does not exist. Work that can clearly establish this relationship represents a significant contribution to the literature, as it can be used to substantiate and develop empirically driven research programs.

The majority of work has used ACL transection models to study measures of PTOA.6-13 Though practical, transection models lack in clinical translation as they violate the joint capsule creating a cascade of negative neuromuscular events that confound observations. For this reason, noninvasive models have been developed that more closely replicate the human mechanism of ACL injury and are particularly advantageous to fully characterize disease progression without the confounding effects of surgical transection.14-16 Despite this evolution, the concurrent investigation of joint kinematics with PTOA progression remains virtually unexplored,17 even with it being a fundamental area of focus for those with a history of joint injury.

To overcome many of these challenges that limit insight into disease progression, the goal of this study was to use our noninvasive rodent model of ACL injury to explore the direct effect of an isolated ACL injury on longitudinal joint kinematics and the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the development of PTOA. To do this, we isolated observations directly to the injury by withholding all analgesics that are known to interfere with gait analysis18 and bone remodeling.19, 20 Then, we used marker-less deep learning software, DeepLabCut,21 to track animal movement and performed comprehensive kinematic analyses to better understand the longitudinal changes in knee kinematic profiles. We then investigated subchondral bone architecture via micro computed tomography (μCT) to determine the association between hallmark measures of joint kinematics and PTOA after ACL injury. As a supplementary analysis, we also investigated sex and regional differences in bone health across the distal femur and proximal tibia.

2 METHODS

2.1 Experimental animal models

40 Long-Evans, 16-week-old male and female rats were obtained from Envigo Laboratories and were randomly assigned to 5 groups: 1 control and 4 ACL-injury (n = 4 male/4 female per group). All animals were housed in individual cages within the vivarium, had a 1-week acclimatization period, and were allowed food and water ad libitum for the duration of the study. Before injury and during the 1-week laboratory acclimatization period, all rats were trained to walk on the motor-driven treadmill with a stable walking pattern. Animals were maintained in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals. This study was approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC approval #A17-042).

2.2 Noninvasive ACL injury

A single load of tibial compression was used to induce knee injury to the right limb of all ACL injury rats. Briefly, rats were anesthetized (5% induction, 2% maintenance isoflurane/500 ml via a nose cone) and the ACL injury was induced in a custom built device (Figure 1) that was instrumented with a linear accelerator (8 mm/s loading rate, model: DC linear actuator L16-63-12-P; Phidgets), load cell (PW6D; HDM Inc), and custom-written software program (LabVIEW; National Instruments) that monitored the release of tibial compression during the load cycle, signifying an ACL tear. After the ACL rupture, a Lachman's test was performed to clinically confirm an ACL injury had occurred by detecting excessive anterior tibial translation while under the plane of anesthesia. The hindlimb was also palpated to detect any gross bone damage. If no contraindications (fractures, damage to other ligaments) were identified, the animal was transferred back to its cage and allowed to recover.

Details are in the caption following the image
Mechanism of Injury. Custom built device used to tear a rat anterior cruciate ligament through a single load of tibial compression. The bottom plate holds the flexed knee, while the ankle is fixated into approximately 30° flexion. The knee is then loaded at a rate of 8 mm/s, increasing the compressive forces on the tibia and causing anterior subluxation of the tibia relative to the femur. The compressive force imposed on the tibia releases when the anterior cruciate ligament is torn, signaling the device to retract [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

All 32 injured rats had a positive Lachman's test at the time of injury. ACL injuries were then confirmed in all 32 injured rats upon dissection following μCT scanning (with no fractures, ruptures or avulsions of other tissues). Mean compressive force at the knee injury for the females and males was 84.81 ± 11.9 N and 96.11 ± 28.2 N, respectively. Mean tearing rate of the knee injury for the females and males was 193.49 ± 32.3 N/s and 235.81 ± 51.3 N/s. Notably, in accordance with IACUC approval, analgesics were withheld throughout the duration of the study to ensure all findings were isolated to the injury, as the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are known to directly interfere with the natural native biological response.22, 23

2.3 Time points, gait collection, and analyses

To detail the time course of knee biomechanical adaptations after ACL injury associated with PTOA a longitudinal study design was utilized, where gait analyses were conducted at one of 4 time points (7, 14, 28, 56 days after injury). Before each session, the right hindlimb was shaved to better define the ankle, knee, and hip in each recording. Walking gait was then collected on a level-ground motor-driven treadmill (EXER 3/6 treadmill) set to 16 m/min24 and recorded at 250 frames per second using OptiTrack Prime Color cameras and Motive software (version 2.1.1).

DeepLabCut, markerless pose-estimation software previously shown to achieve accuracy levels comparable to human labeling,21 was used to track the hip, knee, and ankle in the sagittal plane. Videos were clipped to 5–10 s durations. Frames were then extracted and labeled by one single investigator (MSW) using DeepLabCut's graphical user interface. We used a ResNet-50 based neural network and trained it on 95% of the labeled images. A reiterative process was used to refine the model where frames with poor tracking results, through visual inspection or labels that jumped a pixel distance between frames, were extracted, relabeled, and added back to the model for retraining. The network was considered satisfactory when the training and test errors reached 2.7 and 5.39 pixels, respectively (660,000 iterations; image size: 1920 × 1080 pixels). We used a p-cutoff of 0.9 to condition the (X,Y) coordinates for future video analyses.

The trained network was applied to our unseen videos for analysis and used to predict kinematic landmarks of the hip, knee and ankle joints (X,Y coordinates). The DeepLabCut-tracked trajectories were then imported into Python (3.7), where custom-written software was used to process all kinematic data. Knee sagittal plane angular displacement was extrapolated from the (X,Y) coordinates of each labeled landmark. Three consecutive step cycles for each rat were then extracted and each stride was time normalized to 100% of the step cycle that included both swing and stance phases. Average peak knee flexion angle was extracted from the stance phase of each rat from the time normalized strides. Knee flexion angle throughout the entire step cycle and the average peak knee flexion angle were both utilized for statistical analysis.

2.4 μCT collection and analyses

To quantitatively assess bone health associated with PTOA, the ACL injured rats were euthanized (via carbon dioxide overdose) following gait analysis at one of 4 time points (7, 14, 28, 56 days after injury). Uninjured control rats were euthanized on day 56. ACL-injured knee joints were scanned using μCT (Zeiss XRM Xradia 520 Versa; Zeiss Microscopy) with respective rodent bone settings (beam setting = 70 kV/6 W, pixel size = 12.25 μm) and subsequently analyzed using Dragonfly image analysis software (version 4.1; Object Research Systems).

μCT data were imported in DICOM format and a normalization filter was applied to uniformly distribute subject specific grayscale histograms. Image stacks were reoriented such that two-dimensional view scenes were aligned with their respective anatomical views (axial, sagittal, and coronal). Images were then manually segmented by one investigator (RJB), blinded to time point and injury, and then further subdivided into specific regions of interest (ROI's; Figure 2).14, 15, 25 Subchondral trabecular bone and the subchondral bone plate of the distal femur and proximal tibia were analyzed in the medial and lateral load bearing regions. Femoral load bearing regions were separated at the intercondylar notch and excluded the trochlear region, and tibial load bearing regions were separated at the intercondylar eminence.14

Details are in the caption following the image
Micro computed tomography segmentations and regions of interest used in analyses. First, trabecular (white) and subchondral bone plate (blue) were segmented in the femur (A) and tibia (D). The segmentations were then subdivided into regions of interest for the medial (blue) and lateral (yellow) compartments for trabecular bone (B and E) and subchondral bone plate (C and F). The enthesis region of interest for trabecular bone (yellow) and subchondral bone plate (blue) are shown in (G) with a 3D representation in (H) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

To quantify microarchitectural changes, multiple bone related measures of the subchondral trabecular and subchondral bone plate were calculated. Trabecular bone measures were sampled from the entire load bearing regions (Figures 2B and 2E) and included bone volume fraction (BV/TV, %), trabecular number (Tb.N, 1/mm)25 and tissue mineral density (TMD; mg HA/cm3). Subchondral bone plate measures were sampled from a 1.04 × 1.04 mm2 region of the subchondral bone plate centered in each of the medial and lateral regions of the femur and tibia (Figures 2C and 2F)26 and included subchondral bone plate thickness (SB.Pl.Th, µm) and porosity (Sb.Pl.Po, %). To determine TMD, grayscale units were transformed to hydroxyapatite concentration (mg HA/cm3) using a bone phantom (model: Micro-CT HA D10, Quality Assurance in Radiology and Medicine) which was scanned with the same settings as the samples.

Clinically meaningful measures of PTOA were also assessed from μCT including the medial and lateral joint space width and anterior tibial translation (i.e., position of tibia relative to femur). Joint space width was measured as the minimum distance between the distal edge of the femoral condyle and the proximal edge of the tibial plateau. Anterior tibial translation was extracted from sagittal plane µCT images and measured as the perpendicular distance between a line tangent to the most posterior point of the femoral condyle to a line tangent to the most posterior point of the respective tibial plateau27 on both the lateral and medial sides of the joint. To further extend insight, the femoral ACL enthesis was also explored using the aforementioned microarchitecture measures. This ROI was included, as emerging data indicate that this region of bone is particularly susceptible to PTOA, and thus is an important clinical consideration to more fully illustrate disease progression.28, 29 To capture this ROI, a 1.2 mm diameter cylinder was placed at a 55° angle30 from the tibial articular surface in the frontal plane and at a 30° angle from the femoral articular surface in the axial plane such that the center of the cylinder intercepted the center of the enthesis (Figure 2G). Then, both trabecular and cortical bone were analyzed at the bottom third, or aperture of the cylindrical volume.31 Supportive, qualitative images that characterize the extent of bone remodeling are depicted in Figure 3.

Details are in the caption following the image
Representative bone structures by micro computed tomography at each time point following injury

2.5 Statistical analyses

To detail the time-course of knee biomechanical adaptions after ACL injury, functional analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed using the functional data analysis package in R (version 1.1.5). This approach treats knee joint angles as a polynomial function thereby allowing for the detection of between-group (ACL-injured and control) differences at any percent of the step cycle. This allows for a more comprehensive analysis by comparing the timing and magnitude of knee flexion throughout the entire step cycle rather than at a single percent (i.e. peak knee flexion angle).32 Significant differences were considered to exist when 95% confidence intervals did not overlap zero and were plotted on top of ensemble averages (Figure 4). To detail the time-course of PTOA after ACL injury, two-way ANOVA were performed on all μCT measures with factors of time since injury and sex (male/female) entered into the model. If there was no interaction effect, main effects of time since injury and/or sex were evaluated. In the case of a significant sex by time interaction post hoc one-way ANOVAs and independent t-tests were performed. Fisher's least significant difference post hoc analyses were used to assess pair-wise effects for significant main effects relative to the control group and interactions. To determine regional differences in the femur and the extent of anterior tibial translation, relative difference (relative difference (x,xreference) = Δ/|xreference|) scores were calculated at each time point after ACL injury and two-way ANOVA were performed. For regional differences in the femur, factors of region (enthesis, lateral, medial) and sex were entered into the model. For anterior tibial translation, factors of time and sex were entered into the model with the post-hoc analysis as described above. Finally, to explore biomechanical factors that were associated with bony markers of PTOA after ACL injury, Pearson correlations were conducted to investigate the relationship between peak knee flexion angles during the stance phase of gait and porosity, an early-hallmark measure of PTOA33 that is closely related to articular cartilage degeneration.34, 35 Unlike the functional data analysis described above, peak knee flexion angle is a discrete measure that allows for statistical comparisons. All analyses were performed using RStudio (version 1.1.5), with α levels of ≤.05 required for statistical significance.

Details are in the caption following the image
Longitudinal female (Panels A, B, C, D) and male (Panels E, F, G, H) kinematics and functional analyses of variances between anterior-cruciate-ligament-injured and control rats. The dashed vertical line indicates the percent of the step cycle where average peak knee flexion occurred. Average knee flexion angles across the step cycle are shown for each group with the shaded regions indicating significant differences between limbs. p < .05

3 RESULTS

The primary goal of our work was to directly explore the effect of an isolated ACL injury on longitudinal joint kinematics and the pathogenetic mechanisms of PTOA via detailed analyses of the subchondral bone. Hence, outcomes that directly illuminate this sequala and test this relationship are described in full detail below. Supportive measures that fully characterize noninvasive ACL injury model are described in Tables 2 and 3, and Figures 6-9.

Table 1. Subchondral bone plate remodeling was observed as a function of time and sex, with evidence in the medial and lateral femur and tibia
Subchondral bone plate
Control Day 7 Day 14 Day 28 Day 56
Femur
Sb.Pl.Th (μm) Lateral Females 202.86 ± 23.99 170.02 ± 6.67 164.46 ± 6.49 199.41 ± 13.01 184.55 ± 11.96
Males 218.69 ± 8.51 206.22 ± 3.08 211.97 ± 21.02 198.70 ± 21.83 225.24 ± 8.67
Medial Females 222.48 ± 17.67 170.60 ± 4.81 198.37 ± 5.82 200.36 ± 5.94 186.45 ± 4.43
Males 233.12 ± 22.18 215.90 ± 12.64 231.65 ± 9.95 248.05 ± 10.29 241.83 ± 18.89
Sb.Pl.Po (%) Lateral Females 4.86 ± 1.06 12.34 ± 0.51 20.48 ± 2.30 18.34 ± 2.13 13.54 ± 1.70
Males 4.14 ± 0.50 15.03 ± 0.87 19.55 ± 2.20 22.20 ± 1.96 13.34 ± 1.40
Medial Females 5.05 ± 0.36 9.59 ± 0.40 10.87 ± 0.60 14.53 ± 0.57 10.33 ± 0.95
Males 4.03 ± 0.24 10.74 ± 0.41 12.06 ± 1.41 16.06 ± 0.59 11.84 ± 0.65
Tibia
Sb.Pl.Th (μm) Lateral Females 217.98 ± 13.43 176.49 ± 12.08 178.51 ± 5.45 168.66 ± 12.51 179.49 ± 11.47
Males 257.59 ± 11.41 205.11 ± 11.02 220.84 ± 14.57 233.77 ± 22.69 231.47 ± 8.48
Medial Females 218.52 ± 15.42 165.01 ± 8.77 155.67 ± 9.89 154.12 ± 10.16 170.21 ± 5.33
Males 243.97 ± 12.68 236.16 ± 15.81 244.66 ± 21.17 289.60 ± 42.72 245.78 ± 17.15
Sb.Pl.Po (%) Lateral Females 7.93 ± 0.94 13.06 ± 0.99 17.72 ± 1.64 19.09 ± 1.92 13.90 ± 1.03
Males 4.73 ± 0.93 11.73 ± 0.41 17.73 ± 2.60 19.21 ± 0.36 12.50 ± 0.43
Medial Females 6.20 ± 0.71 9.57 ± 0.42 11.71 ± 0.94 15.99 ± 1.59 11.62 ± 0.96
Males 4.43 ± 0.63 10.30 ± 0.54 11.32 ± 0.55 18.03 ± 0.84 11.38 ± 1.06
Enthesis
Sb.Pl.Th (μm) Females 200.91 ± 8.45 175.89 ± 5.74 166.18 ± 6.80 205.45 ± 9.43 221.29 ± 11.75
Males 232.41 ± 8.74 187.38 ± 14.92 188.36 ± 8.29 215.26 ± 14.85 204.00 ± 24.44
Sb.Pl.Po (%) Females 4.26 ± 0.29 11.02 ± 1.07 15.26 ± 0.89 17.92 ± 0.70 16.27 ± 1.67
Males 5.74 ± 0.22 11.63 ± 0.72 14.24 ± 0.83 19.55 ± 0.83 16.30 ± 0.63
  • Note: Most notably, Sb.Pl.Po was found to be significantly elevated at every time point following injury in all regions of interest (p < .05). Data are represented as mean ± SE. Alpha level, p < .05.
  • Abbreviations: Sb.Pl.Po, subchondral bone plate porosity; Sb.Pl.Th, subchondral bone plate thickness; Sb.Pl.Po, subchondral bone plate porosity.
  • a Significant main effect of sex regardless of time.
  • b Significant main effect of time regardless of sex, relative to controls.
Table 2. Femoral and tibial trabecular bone remodeling was observed as a function of time and sex, and significant changes primarily resided in the medial compartments starting 14 days after injury
Epiphyseal trabecular bone
Control Day 7 Day 14 Day 28 Day 56
Femur
BV/TV (%) Lateral Females 0.42 ± 0.01 0.43 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.02 0.38 ± 0.03 0.43 ± 0.02
Males 0.43 ± 0.01 0.42 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.02 0.39 ± 0.01
Medial Females 0.46 ± 0.01 0.46 ± 0.02 0.42 ± 0.01 0.40 ± 0.03 0.44 ± 0.02
Males 0.46 ± 0.01 0.46 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.02 0.40 ± 0.01
Tb.N (1/mm) Lateral Females 3.91 ± 0.05 3.99 ± 0.12 3.75 ± 0.10 3.78 ± 0.05 3.86 ± 0.10
Males 3.78 ± 0.04 3.63 ± 0.12 3.67 ± 0.14 3.63 ± 0.09 3.42 ± 0.16
Medial Females 4.08 ± 0.03 4.22 ± 0.13 3.97 ± 0.08 3.89 ± 0.06 3.99 ± 0.03
Males 3.84 ± 0.05 3.78 ± 0.08 3.75 ± 0.14 3.76 ± 0.09 3.38 ± 0.06
TMD (mg HA/cm3) Lateral Females 1039.41 ± 41.59 1063.30 ± 15.15 1109.95 ± 21.40 1093.43 ± 18.24 1089.62 ± 22.47
Males 1087.65 ± 31.36 1093.39 ± 29.07 1103.33 ± 20.27 1125.05 ± 20.10 1099.93 ± 18.59
Medial Females 1031.83 ± 36.93 1079.38 ± 14.49 1120.12 ± 22.80 1090.29 ± 16.59 1087.75 ± 21.34
Males 1080.76 ± 29.06 1089.16 ± 31.76 1122.46 ± 14.54 1141.70 ± 20.12 1106.87 ± 20.54
Tibia
BV/TV (%) Lateral Females 0.40 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.01 0.38 ± 0.02 0.36 ± 0.03 0.38 ± 0.02
Males 0.39 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01 0.37 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.01
Medial Females 0.46 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.04 0.40 ± 0.02
Males 0.45 ± 0.00 0.42 ± 0.01 0.38 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.02
Tb.N (1/mm) Lateral Females 4.11 ± 0.07 4.16 ± 0.10 3.88 ± 0.12 3.79 ± 0.10 3.96 ± 0.08
Males 3.72 ± 0.08 3.62 ± 0.13 3.43 ± 0.10 3.52 ± 0.10 3.41 ± 0.12
Medial Females 4.08 ± 0.08 4.09 ± 0.13 3.91 ± 0.08 3.87 ± 0.07 3.91 ± 0.08
Males 3.72 ± 0.06 3.63 ± 0.08 3.43 ± 0.12 3.36 ± 0.07 3.14 ± 0.19
TMD (mg HA/cm3) Lateral Females 996.49 ± 35.03 1020.11 ± 20.46 987.54 ± 102.47 927.00 ± 99.80 1067.14 ± 17.20
Males 1052.31 ± 31.06 1057.27 ± 32.58 1081.38 ± 21.05 1101.41 ± 16.89 1066.18 ± 19.63
Medial Females 1031.30 ± 35.24 1066.01 ± 21.01 1021.94 ± 103.14 1057.26 ± 45.35 1092.85 ± 22.20
Males 1080.63 ± 32.73 1088.26 ± 35.68 1108.91 ± 18.92 1128.40 ± 19.39 1095.75 ± 16.90
Enthesis
BV/TV (%) Females 0.35 ± 0.00 0.39 ± 0.03 0.34 ± 0.00 0.33 ± 0.03 0.39 ± 0.03
Males 0.41 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.01 0.40 ± 0.02 0.40 ± 0.03 0.35 ± 0.02
Tb.N (1/mm) Females 3.25 ± 0.05 3.65 ± 0.21 3.36 ± 0.08 3.27 ± 0.12 3.65 ± 0.14
Males 3.36 ± 0.13 3.41 ± 0.10 3.40 ± 0.16 3.33 ± 0.07 3.05 ± 0.19
TMD (mg HA/cm3) Females 1022.90 ± 39.08 1096.31 ± 14.98 1102.19 ± 20.18 1089.33 ± 10.68 1074.81 ± 24.21
Males 1067.36 ± 29.33 1099.33 ± 30.87 1122.35 ± 14.57 1123.61 ± 18.81 1093.12 ± 17.76
  • Note: Notably, BV/TV was significantly decreased in the medial femoral and tibial compartments and Tb.N was significantly decreased in the medial tibial compartment. In the lateral tibia, Tb.N showed a significant decrease starting at day 14 after injury. All significant sex effects are denoted in the table. No significant main time or sex effects, or interaction effects were found on BV/TV, Tb.N, or TMD in the enthesis region of interest (p > .05). Data are represented as mean ± SE.
  • Abbreviations: BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Tb.N, trabecular number; TMD, tissue mineral density.
  • a Significant main effect of time regardless of sex, relative to controls.
  • b Significant main effect of sex regardless of time.
  • c Significant interaction effect. Post hoc analyses revealed different from day 56.
  • d Significant interaction effect. Post hoc analyses revealed different from males.
Table 3. Medial and lateral anterior tibial translation significantly increased over time
Anatomical orientation
Control Day 7 Day 14 Day 28 Day 56
ATT (%)
Lateral Females −7.58 ± 47 −17.39 ± 32 −5.64 ± 34 45.93 ± 40
Males −8.00 ± 8 46.29 ± 9 65.93 ± 18 136.65 ± 16
Medial Females 13.51 ± 5 42.84 ± 46 16.84 ± 30 119.72 ± 18
Males −4.73 ± 11 7.15 ± 24 42.60 ± 17 98.17 ± 13
JSW (μm)
Lateral Females 126.62 ± 21 278.32 ± 113 266.55 ± 77 315.35 ± 119 244.88 ± 77
Males 86.28 ± 19 418.51 ± 70 554.70 ± 36 440.23 ± 94 541.40 ± 151
Medial Females 236.21 ± 38 367.83 ± 46 389.93 ± 104 295.11 ± 74 401.35 ± 38
Males 227.51 ± 32 326.61 ± 50 345.15 ± 17 305.93 ± 58 382.69 ± 147
  • Note: Anterior-cruciate-ligament-injured males and females on average increased 98% and 120%, respectively, on the medial side and 137% and 46%, respectively, on the lateral side of the knee joint. Lateral joint space width was also found to be significantly increased at every time point following injury. All significant sex effects are denoted in the table. No significant changes in joint space width were indicated on the medial side (p > .05). Data are represented as mean ± SE. Alpha level, p < .05.
  • Abbreviations: ATT, anterior tibial translation; JSW, joint space width.
  • a ATT not reported because used to compute relative difference scores.
  • b Significant main effect of sex regardless of time.
  • c Significant main effect of time regardless of sex. Post hoc analyses revealed different from day 56. Significant moderate-to-strong negative
  • d Significant main effect of time regardless of sex, relative to controls.
Details are in the caption following the image
Representative correlational analyses between knee kinematics and femoral subchondral bone plate porosity. * Indicates statistical significance (p < .05) relative to the control group. (A) Peak knee flexion angles were significantly decreased at all time points following injury (p < .05). (B) Porosity significantly increased at every time point after injury in the medial and lateral femur (p < .05). (C) Significant moderate-to-strong negative correlations were observed between peak knee flexion angle and porosity outcomes in the medial (r = −.65; p < .001) and lateral femur (r = −.71; p < .001) indicating that reduced knee flexion angles were associated with greater porosity, a hallmark bony indicator of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Notably, moderate negative correlations were also observed between peak knee flexion angle and porosity outcomes in the medial (r = −.59; p < .001) and lateral (r = −.64; p < .001) tibia (not shown in figure)
Details are in the caption following the image
Regional differences in the femur at day 7 after injury. Data are represented as mean ± SE. ** Denotes significant differences between regions of interest, p < .05. * Denotes significant sex difference after injury (i.e., sex by time interaction), p < .05. The enthesis was significantly more affected on BV/TV (A) and the lateral compartment was significantly more affected on Sb.Pl.Po compared to the medial compartment and enthesis region of interest. Significant differences between males and females occurred in the medial and lateral compartments on Sb.Pl.Th (D) and Sb.Pl.Po (E). Independent of injury, a significant main effect of sex was observed for Tb.N. BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Sb.Pl.Po, subchondral bone plate porosity; Sb.Pl.Th, subchondral bone plate thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; TMD, tissue mineral density
Details are in the caption following the image
Regional differences in the femur at day 14 after injury. Data are represented as mean ± SE. ** Denotes significant differences between regions of interest, p < .05. * Denotes significant sex difference after injury (i.e., sex by time interaction), p < .05. The enthesis region of interest was the least affected on Sb.Pl.Th, while the lateral compartment was affected the most on Sb.Pl.Po (p < .05). (E) Significant differences between males and females occurred in the medial and lateral compartments on Sb.Pl.Th (D) and in the enthesis region of interest on Sb.Pl.Po (E). Independent of injury, a significant main effect of sex was also observed for TMD. BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Sb.Pl.Po, subchondral bone plate porosity; Sb.Pl.Th, subchondral bone plate thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; TMD, tissue mineral density
Details are in the caption following the image
Regional differences in the femur at day 28 after injury. Data are represented as mean ± SE. * Denotes significant sex difference after injury (i.e., sex by time interaction), p < .05. Significant differences between males and females occurred in the medial and lateral compartments on Sb.Pl.Th (D) and in all regions of interest on Sb.Pl.Po (E). BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Sb.Pl.Po, subchondral bone plate porosity; Sb.Pl.Th, subchondral bone plate thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; TMD, tissue mineral density
Details are in the caption following the image
Regional differences in the femur at day 56 after injury. Data are represented as mean ± SE. * Denotes significant sex difference after injury (i.e., sex by time interaction), p < .05. Significant differences between males and females occurred in the medial and lateral compartments on Sb.Pl.Th (D) and in the medial compartment on Sb.Pl.Po (E). Independent of injury, significant main effects of sex were observed for BV/TV and Tb.N. BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Sb.Pl.Po, subchondral bone plate porosity; Sb.Pl.Th, subchondral bone plate thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; TMD, tissue mineral density

3.1 Knee biomechanical adaptations

Functional data analyses determined significant differences were present between the control group and ACL injury group at all time points following injury (Figure 4, p < .05). At day 7 following injury significant differences occurred during 49%–84% (females, Figure 4A) and 51%–72% (males, Figure 4E) of the step cycle. These changes equated to a 6%–13% decrease (females: 5–10° less during 49%–84%; males: 5–8° less during 51%–72%) in knee flexion angle compared to controls at day 7 (Figures 4A and 4E; p < .05). At day 14 following injury significant differences occurred during 9%–21% (females, Figure 4B) and 28%–40% (males, Figure 4F) of the step cycle. These changes equated to a 5%–8% increase (females: 4–5° more during 9%–21%; males: 5–6° more during 28%–40%) in knee flexion angle compared to controls at day 14 (Figures 4B and 4F; p < .05). The most substantial alterations occurred at the later time points, days 28 and 56 after injury (Figures 4C4D, and 4G,H). At day 28 following injury, significant differences occurred during 4%–28% and 40%–95% (females, Figures 4C) and 1%–16% and 46%–88% (males, Figure 4G) of the step cycle. These changes equated to a 4%–17% decrease (females: 6–9° less during 4%–28% and 4–10° less during 40%–95%; males: 4–6° less during 1%–16% and 5–14° less during 46%–88%) in knee flexion angle compared to controls (Figures 4C and 4G; p < .05). At day 56 following injury significant differences occurred during 1%–5%, 31%–78% (females, Figure 4D) and 36%–85% (males, Figure 4H) of the step cycle. These changes equated to a 5%–18% decrease (females: 6–10° less during 1%–5% and 3–13° less during 31%–78%; males: 4–10° less during 36%–85%) in knee flexion angle compared to controls (Figures 4D and 4H; p < .05). Peak knee flexion angles were also significantly decreased at all time points (p < .001) with no sex (p = .790) or interaction effect (p = .132).

3.2 Subchondral bone plate remodeling

Subchondral bone plate remodeling was observed as a function of time and sex, with evidence in the medial and lateral femur and tibia (Table 1). In the lateral tibia, Sb.Pl.Th was significantly decreased at all time points following injury. In the medial and lateral femur and tibia, a considerable loss of cortical bone was also observed where Sb.Pl.Po was found to be significantly elevated at every time point following injury. Notably, Sb.Pl.Po increased up to day 28 and was followed by a slight recovery at day 56 in all ROI's except the lateral femur where Sb.Pl.Po increased up to day 14 and had a slight recovery at days 28 and 56 but, none of the ROI's returned to a normative value.

3.3 Correlation analyses of knee biomechanical adaptations and PTOA markers

Significant moderate-to-strong negative correlations were observed between peak knee flexion angle and all Sb.Pl.Po outcomes in the medial (r = −.65; p < .001) and lateral (r = −.71; p < .001) femur (Figure 5), and medial (r = −.59; p < .001) and lateral (r = −.64; p < .001) tibia, indicating that reduced knee flexion angles were associated with greater Sb.Pl.Po, an early-hallmark bony measure of PTOA33 that has been closely linked with articular cartilage degeneration.34-36

4 DISCUSSION

We used our noninvasive, analgesic-free, animal model to investigate longitudinal knee kinematic function after ACL injury and its relationship to PTOA. We observed severe declines in joint kinematics through day 56 after injury, which were highlighted through discrete and functional data analyses of peak knee flexion angle (Figures 4 and 5A). Significant subchondral bone plate remodeling was also observed, with a decrease in thickness (lateral tibia) and an increase in porosity in all load bearing regions at every time point post injury (Table 1). Most notably, a clear link was made between reduced peak knee flexion angle and increased porosity (Figure 5). This occurred alongside the considerable loss of epiphyseal trabecular bone (Table 2) and substantial changes in anatomical orientation (Table 3). Regional differences in the femur were also present between load bearing ROI's and the enthesis, signifying a need for further investigation (Figures 6-9).

This is the first study to make a clear link between sagittal plane kinematics (clinical hallmark measures of gait) and PTOA in a noninvasive injury model. The observed smaller knee flexion angle at all time points was largely expected as this has been reported throughout the acute and chronic stages of recovery after ACL injury and reconstruction.3, 4 To extend this finding we incorporated functional data analyses, which are novel applications to the field as they have not yet been performed in rodent studies. The power of a functional data analysis is that it considers entire movement profiles and allows for the assessment of differences between limbs in both time and magnitude. With this analysis, we found the decline in knee kinematics to be immense, with significant changes exhibited throughout the entire step cycle and most predominantly at days 28 and 56. The observed decrease in knee flexion causes a redistribution of mechanical load, and exacerbates joint instability and the mechanical stress induced from the time of injury. In our model, this coincided with the substantial increase in porosity. These findings align with previously reported data associating altered subchondral bone plate microstructure (porosity/perforations), articular cartilage degeneration, and mechanical loading. To this point, Botter et al.35 found an increased in porosity and significantly more cartilage damage 14 days after destabilization via intraarticular cartilage injection in a murine model. Iijima et al.34 further extended this idea by exploring the connection between subchondral bone plate perforations, articular cartilage degeneration, and mechanical loading after destabilization via medial meniscus surgery. Most notably, Iijima et al.34 found that subchondral bone plate perforations were localized to the load bearing region of the medial tibia which corresponded to localized regions of articular cartilage degeneration. Our findings extend those of Botter and Iijima,34, 35 by confirming a direct link through the moderate-to-strong correlations between peak knee flexion and subchondral bone plate remodeling in the load bearing ROI's (Figure 5).

As mentioned, there are differences in the injury mechanisms between Botter et al.35 (destabilization via intraarticular cartilage injection), Iijima et al.34 (destabilization via medial meniscus surgery) and the present study. The completely biological (without the use of injection or analgesics) and noninvasive mechanism of injury in our present study, isolates observations to the injury rather than introducing confounding factors with the use of nonbiological agents or surgically induced models. However, regardless of the injury mechanism, all together our work and that of Botter35 and Iijima34 paint a compelling PTOA mechanism of action that can be attributed to the high levels of cross-talk between joint load (e.g., kinematics), subchondral bone remodeling and articular cartilage degeneration. Mechanistically, the microstructural changes to the subchondral bone can decrease interstitial pressure of articular cartilage and dampen its ability to adequately distribute load.35, 37 Microstructural changes can also facilitate a greater portal for biochemical interactions across the cartilage-bone interface, interfering with processes of maintaining bone health and potentially promoting PTOA.34, 35, 37 Future work utilizing clinically translational models is needed to continue exploring these foundational relationships and mechanisms of PTOA action.

While not the primary goal of this study, we also characterized our model by investigating other bony microarchitecture metrics, anatomical orientations, and regional differences across the femoral ROI's after injury. Trabecular bone loss was considerable across time, sex, and region with the most observed loss occurring in the medial load bearing regions (Table 2). This was consistent with the increase in lateral joint space width (Table 3), suggesting a shift toward medial loading even though medial joint space width was unremarkable. In addition to lateral joint space width, there was substantial changes in medial and lateral anterior tibial translation, likely due to joint instability induced by the ACL injury (Table 3). Regional differences of the femur were also present across the medial, lateral, and enthesis ROI's (Figures 6-9). This observation is noteworthy and suggests a need to further investigate the ACL enthesis or bone-ligament interface as this area may be more susceptible to reinjury and, therefore, may be a significant consideration in deciding optimal tunnel placement during reconstructive surgery and when to undergo surgical intervention.

Our study was not without limitations. First, we did not include contralateral limb comparisons, so it is possible that some of the observed changes in joint kinematics and bony morphology were present in both limbs. Second, we only included sagittal plane kinematics for this study. Extending future studies to cover three-dimensional joint kinematics may inform other modifiable factors beyond peak knee flexion angle that are linked to PTOA. Including analyses of articular cartilage can also help elucidate the cross-talk of the cartilage-bone interface and help identify which is the most prominent modifiable factor in PTOA that can be targeted through clinical intervention. Additionally, knee flexion angle was used to estimate joint load as kinetic data or joint specific loads were not obtained.

In conclusion, ACL injury dramatically alters joint kinematics and, in turn, redistributes mechanical load throughout the joint. The altered kinematic patterns are associated with subchondral bone plate remodeling. This is the first study to make a direct link between sagittal plane kinematics and PTOA in a noninvasive clinically translational injury model.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was Funded by K01AR071503 from NIAMS to Dr Lindsey Lepley.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST

    The authors report no conflict of interest.

    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

    McKenzie S. White, Ross J. Brancati, and Lindsey K. Lepley: substantial contributions to research design, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data. Drafting the paper or revising it critically. Approval of the submitted and final versions. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.