Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation
Corresponding Author
Dr. H. Weinans
Biomechanics Section, University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Biomechanics Section, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorR. Huiskes
Biomechanics Section, University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorB. Van Rietbergen
Biomechanics Section, University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorD. R. Sumner
Section of Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorT. M. Turner
Section of Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorJ. O. Galante
Section of Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dr. H. Weinans
Biomechanics Section, University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Biomechanics Section, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorR. Huiskes
Biomechanics Section, University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorB. Van Rietbergen
Biomechanics Section, University of Nijmegen, Institute of Orthopedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorD. R. Sumner
Section of Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorT. M. Turner
Section of Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorJ. O. Galante
Section of Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Severe loss of bone related to stress-shielding is one problem threatening the long-term integrity of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. It is widely accepted that this phenomenon is caused by adaptive bone remodeling according to Wolff's law. Recently, quantitative bone-remodeling theories have been proposed, suitable for use in computer-simulation models in combination with finite-element codes, which can be applied to simulate the long-term effect of the remodeling process. In the present paper, the results of such a computer simulation are compared with those in an animal experiment. A three-dimensional finite-element model was constructed from an animal experimental configuration concerning the implantation of a fully coated femoral hip prosthesis in dogs. The simulation results of the adaptive bone-remodeling process (geometric adaptations at the periosteal surface and density adaptations within the cancellous bone) were compared with cross-sectional measurements of the canine femurs after 2 years of follow-up. The detailed comparison showed that long-term changes in the morphology of bone around femoral components of total hip replacements can be fully explained with the present quantitative adaptive bone-remodeling theory.
References
- 1 Beaupré GS, Orr TE, Carter DR: An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res 8: 662–670, 1990
- 2 Bergmann G, Siraky J, Rohlmann A, Koelbel R: A comparison of hip joint forces in sheep, dog and man. J Biomech 17: 907–921, 1984
- 3 Bobyn JD, Glassman AH, Goto H, Krygier JJ, Miller JE, Brooks CE: The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 261: 196–213, 1990
- 4 Carter DR, Hayes WC: The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59: 954–962, 1977
- 5 Carter DR: Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 36 (suppl 1): S19–S24, 1984
- 6 Carter DR, Orr TE, Fyhrie DP: Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. J Biomech 22: 231–244, 1989
- 7
Cowin SC,
Hegedus DH:
Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity.
J Elasticity
6:
313–326,
1976
10.1007/BF00041724 Google Scholar
- 8 Cowin SC: Bone remodeling of diaphyseal surfaces by torsional loads: theoretical predictions. J Biomech 20: 1111–1120, 1987
- 9 Currey JD: The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech 21: 131–139, 1988
- 10 Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH: Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69: 45–55, 1987
- 11 Frost HM: The Laws of Bone Structure. Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas, 1964
- 12 Frost HM: Vital biomechanics: proposed general concepts for skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage. Calcif Tissue Int 42: 145–156, 1988
- 13 Fyhrie DP, Carter DR: A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology. J Orthop Res 4: 304–317, 1986
- 14 Fyhrie DP, Carter DR: Femoral head apparent density distribution predicted from bone stresses. J Biomech 23: 1–10, 1990
- 15 Hart RT: Quantitative response of bone to mechanical stress. [PhD thesis]. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 1983
- 16 Hart RT, Davy DT, Heiple KG: Mathematical modeling and numerical solutions for functionally dependent bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 36 (suppl 1): S104–S109, 1984
- 17 Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ: Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 20: 1135–1150, 1987
- 18 Huiskes R, Weinans H, Sumner DR, Fudala B, Turner TM, Grootenboer HJ, Galante JO: Stress-shielding, stress-bypassing and bone resorption around press-fit and bone ingrowth THA. Trans Orthop Res Soc 14: 529, 1989
- 19 Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M: Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 12: 1255–1267, 1989
- 20 Huiskes R: The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 261: 27–38, 1990
- 21 Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Burke DW, O'Conner DO, Zalenski EB, Bragdon C, Harris WH: Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties: a study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. Clin Orthop 249: 129–140, 1989
- 22 Martin RB: The effects of geometric feedback in the development of osteoporosis. J Biomech 5: 447–455, 1972
- 23 Martin RB: Porosity and specific surface of bone. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 10: 179–222, 1984
- 24 Miller J, Kelebay L: Bone ingrowth: disuse osteoporosis. Orthop Trans 5: 380, 1981
- 25 Orr TE, Beaupré GS, Carter DR, Schurman DJ: Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. J Arthroplasty 5: 191–200, 1990
- 26 Orr TE, Beaupré GS, Carter DR: Proximal femoral architecture computed from three-dimensional models relating bone morphogenesis to stress histories. Trans Orthop Res Soc 15: 77, 1990
- 27 Sumner DR Jr, Galante JO: Bone ingrowth. In: Surgery of the Musculoskeletal System, ed by CMcC Evarts, 2nd ed Vol 1, pp 151–176. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1990
- 28 Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Galante JO: Remodeling and ingrowth of bone at two years in a canine cementless total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74: 239–250, 1992
- 29 Turner TM, Sumner DR, Urban RMN, Rivero DP, Galante JO: A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68: 1396–1409, 1986
- 30 Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ: Convergence and uniqueness of adaptive bone remodeling. Trans Orthop Res Soc 14: 310, 1989
- 31 Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ: A hypothesis concerning minimal bone density threshold levels as final stages of bone remodeling. Trans Orthop Res Soc 15: 78, 1990
- 32 Weinans H, Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, van Rietbergen B: The effect of adaptive bone remodeling threshold levels on resorption around noncemented hip stems. In: Advances in Bioengineering, BED Vol 20, pp 303–306. Ed by R Vanderby New York, ASME, 1991
- 33 Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ: The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech 25: 1425–1441, 1992