Longitudinal monitoring of Torque Teno virus DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients correlates with long-term complications of inadequate immunosuppression
Luc Chauvelot and Thomas Barba are co-first author of this study.
Abstract
Optimization of individual immunosuppression, which reduces the risks of both graft loss and patients' death, is considered the best approach to improve long-term outcomes of renal transplantation. Torque Teno Virus (TTV) DNAemia has emerged as a potential biomarker reflecting the depth of therapeutic immunosuppression during the initial year post-transplantation. However, its efficacy in long-term monitoring remains uncertain. In a cohort study involving 34 stable kidney transplant recipients and 124 healthy volunteers, we established lower and upper TTV DNAemia thresholds (3.75–5.1 log10 cp/mL) correlating with T-cell activatability, antibody response against flu vaccine, and risk for subsequent serious infections or cancer over 50 months. Validation in an independent cohort of 92 recipients confirmed that maintaining TTV DNAemia within this range in >50% of follow-up time points was associated with reduced risks of complications due to inadequate immunosuppression, including de novo DSA, biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection, graft loss, infections, or cancer. Multivariate analysis highlighted “in-target” TTV DNAemia as the sole independent variable significantly linked to decreased risk for long-term complications due to inadequate immunosuppression (odds ratio [OR]: 0.27 [0.09–0.77]; p = 0.019). Our data suggest that the longitudinal monitoring of TTV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients could help preventing the long-term complications due to inadequate immunosuppression.
Abbreviations
-
- AMR
-
- antibody-mediated rejection
-
- CKD-EPI
-
- chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration
-
- CNI
-
- calcineurin inhibitors
-
- DSA
-
- donor-specific antibodies
-
- eGFR
-
- estimated glomerular filtration rate
-
- OR
-
- odd ratio
-
- PBMC
-
- peripheral blood mononuclear cells
-
- ROC curve
-
- receiver operating characteristic
-
- TCMR
-
- T-cell-mediated rejection
-
- Tfh cells
-
- T follicular helper
-
- TTV
-
- Torque Teno virus
1 INTRODUCTION
Kidney transplantation has emerged as the optimal treatment for end-stage renal failure, providing patients.1 However, genetic differences between donors and recipients trigger an alloimmune response against the transplanted organ, leading to gradual graft destruction. To prevent graft rejection, transplant recipients rely on a combination of immunosuppressive drugs throughout the transplantation period. These drugs, while effective in preventing rejection, also weaken the recipient's immune system, increasing the risk of common and opportunistic infections2 and cancer.3
Balancing these competing risks and adjusting immunosuppressive drug dosages over time exemplifies the essence of precision medicine. Currently, physicians primarily employ two suboptimal methods established at the inception of transplantation. First, they monitor trough levels of immunosuppressive drugs, which represents a pharmacokinetic-based approach but fails to consider individual variations in drug response.4-7 Second, they rely on the occurrence of complications, an a posteriori approach that limits treatment options. The need for noninvasive biomarkers to guide immunosuppressive therapy is evident.8
Recent research suggests that the replication kinetics of Torque Teno Virus (TTV), a nonpathogenic single-stranded DNA virus, may reflect the “depth” of therapeutic immunosuppression and aid in its management. Independent studies have indicated that transplant patients with low TTV DNAemia face an increased risk of graft rejection, while higher DNA loads correlate with post-transplant infections.9-13 However, it is crucial to note that these studies have primarily focused on the first-year post-transplantation.
While there have been significant improvements in kidney transplant outcomes within the first year, the long-term success of renal grafts remains a concern.14 The nature of complications threatening graft and patient survival changes over time post-transplantation. For instance, T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) becomes less common beyond 1-year post-transplantation.15 In contrast, the generation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) can occur at any time, even in the late stages, making antibody-mediated rejection the leading cause of late allograft failure.16-20 Along the same line, while most opportunistic infectious complications of the first post-transplant year are kept under control by available prophylaxis,2, 21 the global trend for transplanting older patients has led to the emergence of bacterial infections and cancer as important risks, the incidence of which increases with time post-transplantation.22
The present study was therefore specifically designed to evaluate the potential of TTV DNAemia as a noninvasive biomarker for the occurrence of long-term (i.e., beyond the first year of transplantation) complications of inadequate (under- and over-) immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.
2 MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1 Study population
The study population consisted of discovery and an independent validation cohort, both issued from recipients of a first kidney (or kidney–pancreas) graft followed at the Lyon University Hospital Transplantation Center (France).
The discovery cohort included 34 consecutive adult patients who participated in the flu vaccination campaign. The exclusion criteria included an age over 70 and the presence of circulating DSA or ongoing rejection, to eliminate potential bias on the flu vaccine response due to immunosenescence or the majoration of immunosuppressive therapy. Other exclusion criteria included any counter-indication to influvac® vaccine, ongoing infectious disease, pregnancy, intravenous immunoglobulins injection in the last 3 months. Patients with undetectable TTV DNAemia were excluded due to the lack of a reliable assay for screening anti-TTV IgG, making it unclear whether these patients effectively controlled TTV replication or were uninfected. The nature and trough levels of the immunosuppressive drugs were recorded at the time of vaccination, as well as proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), estimated by the CKD-EPI formula. Patients were injected with influvac® vaccine according to the flu vaccination campaign guidelines. Assessments of antibody-response and T-cell activatability (see below) were conducted at the peak of the response (between 21 and 28 days after vaccination). The medical records of these patients were retrospectively screened for pre-defined events related to over-immunosuppression. These events included: (i) infections (bacterial, viral, or fungal) requiring or prolonging hospitalization and (ii) the development of de novo solid or hematological malignancies (including in situ basal and squamous cell skin carcinomas) within the 4 years following vaccination. Infections treated in the outpatient setting were not included as to limit recall bias. TTV DNAemia was measured retrospectively in serum samples collected prior vaccination. A control group for this discovery cohort comprised 124 consecutive healthy volunteers with detectable TTV DNAemia who were accepted for a living kidney donation in Groningen Transplantation center (The ethical approval number of this study is METc 2008/186).
The validation cohort consisted of a total of 93 consecutive kidney and kidney pancreas recipients transplanted in Lyon University Hospital (France) between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015 who were prospectively enrolled 12 months after transplantation. Exclusion criteria were the same as in the discovery cohort. Relevant clinical events related to over-immunosuppression (see above) and under-immunosuppression (appearance of de novo DSA, episode of biopsy-proven rejection, and graft loss) were recorded for 36 months after the inclusion (up to 48 months post-transplantation). The trough level of immunosuppressive drugs, proteinuria, eGFR, and presence of DSA were prospectively monitored during the follow-up period, at least annually, with additional checks conducted in immunizing situations (e.g., transfusions) or when rejection was suspected. “For-cause” biopsies were performed in case of allograft dysfunction (onset of proteinuria and/or decrease eGFR) or appearance of de novo DSA. TTV DNAemia was retrospectively measured in plasma samples prospectively collected at predefined post-transplantation timepoints (12, 24, and 36 months). Undetectable TTV DNAemia at each of the three follow-up timepoints was considered an exclusion criterion.
The clinical and research activities being reported are consistent with the Principles of the Declaration of Istanbul. All participants from both cohorts gave written consent. The study was approved by the Local Institutional Review Board (approval number: 2020-A02918-31).
2.2 Influenza vaccination
All patients from the discovery cohorts received a subcutaneous injection of the Influvac® vaccine. The vaccine was adjuvant-free and contained antigens from three distrinct influenza strains (A/California, (H1N1pdm09), A/Switzerland (H3N2), and B/Phuket). Since our interest was for primary humoral response, the analysis was focused on the response to Switzerland virus, the only of the three strains that was selected for the northern hemisphere influenza vaccine formulation for the first time.
2.3 T-cell residual activatability
Blood was collected immediately prior influenza vaccination in patients of the discovery cohort. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and plasma were isolated using Ficoll gradient centrifugation. PBMCs were cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2 in 1 mL of patient's own plasma, with and without anti-CD3/CD28 beads (Gibco DynabeadsR). After 24 h, anti-CD3/CD28 beads were removed using a magnet and the cells were stained 30 min at room temperature in the dark with fluorescent antibodies. Anti-CD3 (UHCT1), anti-CD4 (SK3), anti-CXCR5 (RF8B2), anti-CXCR3 (1C3), anti-CCR6 (11A9), anti-CD25 (2A3), anti-CD40L (TRAP1), anti-ICOS (ISA-3) (all from BD Biosciences), and viability dye LIVE/DEAD Aqua (Invitrogen) were used. A FACS ARIA II flow cytometer was used for flow cytometry. Data were analyzed with BD FACS Diva (BD Biosciences) and FlowJoR software (FlowJo, LLC). All samples were run on the same instrument, which was calibrated with Rainbow Calibration ParticlesR before each acquisition (SpheroTech).
2.4 Anti-hemagglutin antibody titer
Blood was collected immediately prior influenza vaccination and between 21 and 28 days later in the patients of the discovery cohort.
Normalized titer of anti-hemagglutinin antibody was measured using hemagglutination-Inhibition assay. Briefly, a fixed amount of Switzerland viral strain was added to serial dilution of the serum of patients and the plate was incubated for 1 h in the presence of red blood cells. Influenza virus has the property to bind to sialic acid receptors on erythrocytes. When antibodies against influenza virus are present, they prevent the attachment of the virus to red blood cell and therefore inhibit the hemagglutination. The highest dilution of serum that prevents hemagglutination defines the HI titer of the serum and corresponds to the antibody titer against the tested influenza virus strain. The analysis focused on Switzerland viral strain because it was selected for the northern hemisphere influenza vaccine formulation for the first time in 2015 and we wanted to identify the patient at risk of primary humoral response.
2.5 TTV DNAemia quantification
TTV DNAemia was quantified the day prior influenza vaccination using the TTV R-GENE® kit following the manufacturer's (bioMérieux) instructions. Briefly, Internal Control 2 was added to all samples and to the negative control. Then, nucleic acids were extracted from 200 µL of samples and eluted in 50 µL elution buffer using the NucliSENS® easyMAG® platform (bioMérieux). Ten microliters of extracted DNA were added to 15 µL of the ready-to-use amplification mixture. In each run, one sensitivity control and four quantification standards were included. Thermal cycling was performed for 15 min at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 40 s using the ABI7500Fast (Applied Biosystems). Results were recorded as copies/mL (cp/mL) as determined by the quantification standards range.
Analytical performances of the TTV R‑GENE® kit was assessed in serum samples by the manufacturer (BioMerieux). The LoD95% in serum was confirmed at 250 cp/mL on eight TTV species (1, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24, 27, and 29—linearized plasmids). The tested concentrations for precision and linearity allowed to demonstrate a quantification range from 2.4 to 9.0 log10 cp/mL. For the multiple-amplification platforms study, the maximum absolute difference between all tested platforms and the QS5 used as reference was 0.5 log10 cp/mL, with a maximum average of 0.2 log10 cp/mL.23
2.6 Statistical analyses
Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between the groups were evaluated by Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests for quantitative variables, and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Spearman correlation was used for correlation matrix analyses. Survival data were compared using the Log-Rank test.
The lower and upper thresholds of TTV DNAemia defining under- and over-immunosuppression were determined using different approaches. The lower threshold, under which patients are considered as non-immunocompromised, and therefore expected to present normal antibody responses (risk of rejection), was established using the data from the healthy volunteers of the Groningen cohort, defined as the average TTV DNAemia plus 2 standard deviations. The upper threshold, above which patients are expected to experience more complications of over-immunosuppression, was defined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve approach on data from the longitudinal follow-up of the discovery cohort.
Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression for categorical outcomes and Cox Proportional Hazard regression for survival data. Variables that were associated with the outcome in univariate analyses (p < 0.2), or those suspected to be associated with the outcome based on literature, were included in the multivariate analyses. Of note, transplantation vintage was, by design (see above), the same for all patients from the validation cohort and was therefore not included in the corresponding multivariate analysis.
Longitudinal TTV DNAemia levels in the validation cohort were evaluated by quantifying the percentage of values within the target range established with the discovery cohort. After descriptive analyses, a 50% cutoff was determined as an appropriate threshold, as it conferred sufficient statistical power by dividing the validation cohort into two equal subgroups, while remaining clinically relevant.
All the tests used were two-sided. The test used for comparison is indicated in the figure legends. The differences between the groups were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05.
Statistical analysis and graphs were performed using Prism software 8 (GraphPad), CIRCOS software, and R software.
3 RESULTS
3.1 TTV DNAemia correlates with residual activatability of circulating T cells of renal transplant recipients
Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI, i.e., ciclosporine and tacrolimus), which currently represents the corner stone of maintenance immunosuppression, block the early steps of TCR signaling cascade, thereby preventing the upregulation of many genes, including the α chain of IL-2 high-affinity receptor (CD25).24 In a previous study, our group has reported that despite having adequate trough levels of CNI, up to 20% of renal transplant recipients displayed normal expression of CD25 on T follicular helper (Tfh) cells following in vitro stimulation (i.e., “residual activatability”), a status that was associated with an increased risk to develop de novo DSA.25
To determine whether TTV DNAemia could be a potential biomarker for insufficient maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients, we first evaluated how it correlated with the residual activatability of the various T-cell subsets. Briefly, the PBMCs from 34 kidney transplant patients (Table 1) on CNI-based immunosuppression [28 (82.3%) on tacrolimus and 6 (17.7%) on ciclosporin] were collected at 23 ± 17 months after transplantation and cultured 24 h with anti-CD3/CD28 microbeads in the presence of patient's own plasma containing relevant concentration of IS drugs (Figure 1A). The PBMCs of seven healthy volunteers (51 ± 9.96 years old, 2/7 [28.6%] male) served as controls. Flow cytometry was used to (i) identify the seven distinct subsets of CD3+ T cells: four subsets of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells involved in TCMR (Figure 1B) and three subsets of CD4+ CXCR5+ Tfh26 involved in donor-specific antibodies (DSA) generation (Figure 1C), and (ii) to measure the level of expression of the activation marker CD25 on each subset at baseline and post-activation (Figure 1B–D). As expected, a drastic upregulation of CD25 was observed on the cells of the seven T-cell subsets for all (7/7, 100%) the healthy volunteers (Figure 1D). Although the values were reduced in immunosuppressed kidney transplant patients (Figure 1D), the post-activation expression of CD25 was not null, indicating a residual T-cell activatability, which was highly variable between kidney transplant patients (Figure 1D).
Number of patients | n = 34 |
---|---|
Characteristics at transplantation, mean ± SD or n (%) | |
Age (years) | 54 ± 14.1 |
Gender (male) | 21 (61.7) |
Renal disease | |
Diabetes mellitus | 5 (14.7) |
Glomerulonephritis | 4 (11.8) |
Genetic | 6 (17.6) |
Vascular | 10 (29.4) |
Undetermined | 7 (20.6) |
Uropathy | 2 (5.9) |
Living donor | 3 (8.8) |
Combined kidney-pancreas | 3 (8.8) |
Induction therapy | |
Thymoglobulin | 30 (88.2) |
Basiliximab | 4 (11.8) |
Maintenance regimen | |
Tacrolimus | 28 (82.3) |
Ciclosporin | 6 (17.6) |
mTOR-inhibitor | 4 (11.8) |
Mycophenolate mofetil | 32 (94.1) |
Prednisone | 24 (70.6) |
Characteristics at enrollment, mean ± SD or n (%) | |
Time elapsed since transplantation (months) | 23 ± 17 |
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 61 ± 22 |
Proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h | 5 (11.8) |
Characteristics at the end of follow-up, mean ± SD or n (%) | |
Time elapsed since transplantation (months) | 72 ± 25 |
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 26.8 ± 21.5 |
Proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h | 6 (17.6) |
Adverse events | 21 (61.7) |
Antibody-mediated rejection | 1 (2.9)a |
De novo DSA | 4 (11.8) |
Serious infectious events | 12 (35.3) |
Bacterial infection | 8 (23.5)b |
Viral infection | 3 (8.8)c |
Fungal infection | 1 (2.9)d |
Cancers | 5 (14.7) |
Skin cancer (other than melanoma) | 3 (8.8) |
Other solid tumors | 2 (5.9) |
Patient's death or graft loss | 3 (8.8) |
- Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate with CKD-EPI formula; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.
- a Banff score: g1 ptc2 i2 t3 v0 C4d1.
- b Bacterial infections: Streptococcus pneumoniae infections (n = 3 pneumonia, n = 1 endocarditis), Escherichia coli pyelonephritis (n = 3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa angiocholitis (n = 1).
- c Viral infections: CMV disease (n = 1), BKV nephritis (n = 1), VHB fulminant hepatitis (n = 1).
- d Fungal infection: mucormycosis (n = 1).

The statistical relation between TTV DNAemia and the residual activatability of the seven T-cell subsets was then analyzed. An inverse correlation between TTV DNAemia and residual activatability of effector cytotoxic T cells was observed (Figure 1E). Furthermore, this was also observed for all three subsets of Tfh (Figure 1E), particularly Tfh2 and Tfh17, which are key for providing help to B cells.26 These results suggest that low TTV DNAemia transplant recipients could be at higher risk to develop de novo DSA and therefore antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).17, 27 Interestingly, in contrast with TTV DNAemia, there was no statistical correlation between tacrolimus trough levels and the residual activatability of any of the seven T-cell subsets (Figure 1E).
3.2 Low TTV DNAemia correlates with antibody response against T-cell-dependent antigens in renal transplant recipients
A control cohort consisting of 124 healthy volunteers (56 ± 10 years old, 55/124 male [44,3%]) was used for comparison with the 34 kidney transplanted patients of the discovery cohort. As expected, TTV DNAemia was significantly lower in healthy controls (Figure 2A).

Interestingly, TTV DNAemia was highly variable among transplant recipients, some having TTV DNAemia within the range of what observed in healthy volunteers (red dots in Figure 2A). Setting the Z-score to 2, a classical approach to identify outliers,28 we defined a threshold of 3.75 log10 cp/mL under which renal transplant patients could be considered under-immunosuppressed (Figure 2A). Interestingly, this value is consistent with what recently observed with the same assay in a large cohort of healthy blood donors.29
The incidence of de novo DSA is low (estimated 2%–10% per year20) and only four patients from the discovery cohort developed de novo DSA during follow-up (and only one biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection). This low incidence does not allow to directly test the hypothesis that transplant recipients with a TTV DNAemia <3.75 log10 cp/mL are at higher risk to develop de novo DSA. Instead, we reasoned that, since DSA are directed against the donor-specific (HLA or non-HLA) polymorphic proteins, their generation results from the same prototypical T-cell-dependent humoral response at stake for the response to any protein-based vaccine. Therefore, we took advantage of the campaign of influenza vaccine30 that can be considered a standardized synchronized immune stimulation with hemagglutinin, a prototypical thymo-dependent antigen.31
The normalized titer of anti-hemagglutinin antibody was measured just prior vaccination and at the peak of the response and compared between patients whose TTV DNAemia was below versus above 3.75 log10 cp/mL (Figure 2B). In line with our hypothesis patients whose TTV DNAemia was below 3.75 log10 cp/mL developed significantly higher antibody titers (Figure 2C). In contrast, the magnitude of the antibody response could not be predicted from the routine monitoring of the trough levels of CNI (Figure 2D).
3.3 High TTV DNAemia correlates with complications associated with over-immunosuppression
To evaluate whether TTV DNAemia could serve as a biomarker for over-immunosuppression, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of the 34 renal transplant recipients of the discovery cohort focusing on serious infectious complications (defined as any infection requiring or prolonging hospitalization) and cancerous complications (diagnosis of solid or hematological malignancies). Over a follow-up period of 50 ± 16 months postvaccination, 21 events linked to over-immunosuppression were identified (Table 1). These included: 12 (35.3%) serious infectious events (n = 8 bacterial, n = 3 viral, and n = 1 fungal infections) and 5 (14.7%) cancers (n = 3 skin cancers and n = 2 other solid organ tumors).
The optimal cutoff value for TTV DNAemia (5.1 log10 cp/mL), which best distinguishes patients who have experienced complications of over-immunosuppression from those who have not, was established using ROC curve analysis (Figure 3A,B). The multivariate survival analysis identified TTV DNAemia >5.1 log10 cp/mL (HR: 9.41 [2.52-35.3]; p < 0.001; Table 2 and Figure 3C) as the only baseline variable that correlates with the subsequent occurrence of complications due to over-immunosuppression (Table 2).

Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | p Value | HR | 95% CI | p Value | |
Clinico-biologic characteristics | ||||||
Recipient gender | ||||||
Female | 1.00 | Reference | ||||
Male | 0.84 | (0.27–2.68) | 0.78 | 0.78 | (0.23–2.66) | 0.70 |
Recipient age (per year) | 1.04 | (0.98–1.09) | 0.16 | 1.06 | (0.98–1.14) | 0.08 |
eGFR (per mL/min/1.73 m2) | 1.00 | (0.98–1.02) | 0.98 | |||
Proteinuria (per mg/mmol creatinin) | 1.00 | (0.99–1.01) | 0.71 | |||
Transplantation vintage (per month) | 0.97 | (0.95–0.99) | 0.02 | 1.00 | (0.96–1.03) | 0.84 |
Immunosuppression | ||||||
Induction | ||||||
ATG | 1.00 | Reference | ||||
Simulect | 0.47 | (0.10–2.13) | 0.33 | |||
CNI trough level | ||||||
In target | 1.00 | Reference | ||||
Over | 1.65 | (0.52–5.24) | 0.39 | |||
Under | 0.19 | (0.02–1.52) | 0.11 | |||
TTV DNAemia | ||||||
<5.1 Log10 cp/mL | 1.00 | Reference | ||||
≥5.1 Log10 cp/mL | 9.89 | (2.82–34.64) | <0.001 | 9.41 | (2.52–35.20) | <0.001 |
- Abbreviations: ATG, antithymocyte globulin; CI, confidence interval; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated with the modification of diet in renal disease formula; HR, hazard ratio.
3.4 Independent validation of the value of TTV DNAemia as a biomarker for long-term complications of inadequate immunosuppression
Having defined the lower (3.75 log10 cp/mL) and upper (5.1 log10 cp/mL) cut-off values of TTV DNAemia associated with the occurrence of complications due to, respectively, under- and over-immunosuppression, we went on validating these thresholds in an independent prospective cohort of 93 patients.
One patient with undetectable TTV DNAemia at all time points of analysis was excluded from analysis. The characteristics of the 92 remaining patients of the validation cohort are presented in Table 3. Briefly, all 92 patients received a kidney or a kidney-pancreas grafts (n = 16; 17,4%) at Lyon University Hospital and were prospectively enrolled at 12 months post-transplantation. All received an induction therapy with either thymoglobulin (n = 58; 63%) or basiliximab (n = 34; 37%). Of note, the nature of the induction therapy did not have an impact on the TTV DNAemia of patients during the late follow-up period of the study (data not shown). All patients except 2 were on CNI-based maintenance immunosuppression (n = 11, 11.9% on ciclosporin A and n = 79, 85.9% on tacrolimus). The target trough levels for tacrolimus were 5–7 ng/mL (80–120 µg/mL for ciclosporin). Complications due to over-immunosuppression (infections and cancers) and under-immunosuppression (appearance of de novo DSA, episode of biopsy-proven rejection, and graft loss) were recorded over a follow-up period of 3 years (Table 3).
Number of patients | n = 92 |
---|---|
Characteristics at transplantation, mean ± SD or n (%) | |
Age (years) | 52 ± 14.3 |
Gender (male) | 66 (71.7) |
Renal disease | |
Diabetes mellitus | 27 (29.3) |
glomerulonephritis | 21 (22.8) |
Genetic | 13 (14.1) |
Vascular | 9 (9.8) |
Undetermined | 10 (10.9) |
Uropathy | 5 (5.4) |
Other | 7 (7.6) |
Living donor | 17 (18.4) |
Combined kidney-pancreas | 16 (17.4) |
Induction therapy | |
Thymoglobulin | 58 (63) |
Basiliximab | 34 (37) |
Initial maintenance regimen | |
Tacrolimus | 79 (85.9) |
Ciclosporin | 11 (11.9) |
mTOR-inhibitors | 4 (4.3) |
Mycophenolate mofetil | 90 (97.8) |
Prednisone | 90 (97.8) |
Preformed DSA | 0 (0) |
Characteristics at the end of follow-up | |
De novo DSA | 6 (6.5) |
Biopsy proven AMR episode | 3 (3.2)a |
Graft loss | 6 (6.5) |
Patient's death | 7 (7.6) |
Serious infectious events | 32 (34.8) |
Timing | |
M12 to M24 | 11 (11.9) |
M24 to M36 | 13 (14.1) |
M36 to M48 | 8 (8.7) |
Nature of infectious events | |
Bacterial infection | 19 (20.6)b |
Fungal infection | 4 (4.3)c |
Viral infection | 9 (9.8)d |
Cancers | 20 (21.7) |
Timing | |
M12 to M24 | 9 (9.8) |
M24 to M36 | 5 (5.4) |
M36 to M48 | 6 (6.5) |
Nature of carcinologic events | |
Skin cancer (other than melanoma) | 15 (16.3) |
Other solid tumor | 5 (5.4) |
- Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate with CKD-EPI formula; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.
- a Banff scores: g3 ptc2 i0 t0 v0 C3d0, g1 ptc0 i1 t2 v0 C4d3, g1 ptc2 i0 t1 v0 C4d1.
- b Bacterial infections: Gram-negative bacteria pyelonephritis (n = 10), Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia (n = 4), colitis (n = 3 Gram-negative bacteria, n = 1 Clostridium difficile), bacteremia secondary to otitis (n = 2).
- c Fungal infections: pulmonary aspergillosis (n = 2), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (n = 1), esophagial candidiasis (n = 1).
- d Viral infections: BKV nephritis (n = 3), CMV infection (n = 1), flu (n = 1), herpetic gingivostomatitis (n = 1), viral hepatitis (n = 1 VHE, n = 1 VHB), varicella-zoster virus infection (n = 1).
TTV DNAemia was measured retrospectively in prospectively collected samples at 12, 24, and 36 months post-transplantation (Figure 4A). As expected, the mean TTV DNAemia was higher at M12 (5.26 ± 1.8 log10 cp/mL) than at M24 and M36 (4.11 ± 1.8 and 3.92 ± 1.9 log10 cp/mL, respectively; p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA test), which reflects the tapering of maintenance immunosuppression beyond the first year of transplantation. Interestingly, while all these patients were managed according to the same trough level-based rules for adjusting the dose of CNI, massive interindividual variations in TTV DNAemia could be evidenced, suggesting that trough levels of CNI poorly reflect the individual depth of therapeutic immunosuppression. In fact, only a minority of patients had a TTV DNAemia within 3.75 and 5.1 log10 cp/mL, the target range defined from the discovery cohort (n = 27 [30%], n = 32 [36.7%], and n = 34 [39.5%] at, respectively, 12, 24, and 36 months post-transplantation; Figure 4B). Interestingly, and consistently with our hypothesis, patients with TTV DNAemia within the target range at >50% of time points were those with the lowest incidence of complications due to “inadequate” (i.e., under- or over-) immunosuppression (Figure 4C). Furthermore, the total number of complications due to inadequate immunosuppression was also lower in patients with TTV DNAemia within target at >50% of time points (Figure 4D).

We conducted a multivariate analysis using multinomial logistic regression to determine the variables associated with the occurrence of a complication due to “inadequate” immunosuppression. TTV DNAemia and CNI trough levels within the target range >50% of controls were forced into the model (Table 4). TTV DNAemia within target at >50% of timepoints was the sole variable associated with a reduced risk (OR: 0.27 [0.09–0.77]; p = 0.019; Figure 4E; Table 4) to develop a complication due to “inadequate” immunosuppression. Of note, despite that CNI trough levels were controlled prospectively and much more frequently than TTV DNAemia (9.8 ± 3.6 vs. 3 times per patients, respectively) over the 3 years follow-up period, CNI trough levels within the target range at >50% of controls were not associated with a reduced risk to develop a complication due to “inadequate” immunosuppression (p = 0.93; Table 4).
Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value | |
Clinico-biologic characteristics | ||||||
Male sex | 0.79 | (0.32–1.96) | 0.614 | 0.62 | (0.22–1.77) | 0.374 |
Age | 1.02 | (0.99–1.05) | 0.224 | 1.03 | (0.99–1.07) | 0.169 |
eGFR (per mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.98 | (0.96–1.00) | 0.076 | 0.99 | (0.96–1.02) | 0.441 |
Proteinuria (per g/24 h) | 3.23 | (1.16–15.45) | 0.081 | 2.86 | (0.91–19.72) | 0.194 |
GC bolus | ||||||
Yes | 3.71 | (1.38–10.83) | 0.012 | 2.65 | (0.89–8.88) | 0.108 |
CNI trough levels | ||||||
in target >50% | 0.62 | (0.23–1.56) | 0.315 | 1.05 | (0.39–2.84) | 0.926 |
TTV DNAemia | ||||||
in target >50% | 0.36 | (0.13–0.9) | 0.034 | 0.27 | (0.09–0.77) | 0.019 |
- Abbreviations: BPAR, biopsy proven acute rejection; CI, confidence interval; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated with the modification of diet in renal disease formula; GC, glucocorticoids; OR, odds ratio.
Finally, additional analyses were conducted using a higher upper TTV DNAemia cutoff (6.1 log10 cp/mL) to assess changes in biomarker sensitivity. This new cutoff was proved less effective than the 5.1 log10 cp/mL cutoff in identifying patients at higher risk of complications (Figure S2A). Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis using the 6.1 log10 cp/mL cutoff no longer demonstrated an association between TTV DNAemia and the risk of complications due to inadequate immunosuppression (Figure S2B).
4 DISCUSSION
In recent decades, the attention of renal transplant community has shifted toward improving the long-term graft and patient survival.32 One major factor contributing to graft loss, particularly in the form of AMR, is insufficient maintenance immunosuppression.16-18, 20 Paradoxically, prolonged exposure to high doses of immunosuppressive drugs poses risks such as infections and cancer, threatening the lives of transplant recipients.2 Since optimizing maintenance immunosuppression appears as the most straightforward approach to enhance long-term outcomes in renal transplantation, the research community has been actively looking for noninvasive “immunometer,” that is, biomarkers informing on the immune status of graft recipients.8
Several functional assays, involving stimulating patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro and monitoring various response parameters, have been developed. While the latter have shown some promises,5, 33-36 their adoption in clinical practice has been impeded by their complexity and time-consuming nature.
Recently, the evaluation of graft recipients' immune functions has turned to monitoring viral replication, specifically using nucleic acid amplification testing for adenovirus, BK polyomavirus, and cytomegalovirus. However, as these viruses can cause severe complications after transplantation, researchers have shifted their focus to TTV. TTV is part of the Anelloviridae family and exhibits properties that make it suitable for immune monitoring. It has a small, single-stranded circular DNA genome, can establish chronic infections without causing pathological manifestations, and is highly prevalent worldwide,37 especially among graft recipients.38 Furthermore, TTV levels are not influenced by conventional antiviral drugs used for prophylaxis.39
Previous studies have shown that monitoring TTV DNAemia can effectively identify kidney transplant recipients at risk of rejection and infection during the first-year post-transplantation.9-13, 40-42 However, there was limited evidence on the performance of this biomarker for long-term complications. Only two retrospective studies have specifically addressed this issue. Schiemann et al. analyzed a cohort of kidney transplant recipients at a median of 6.3 years post-transplantation and found that those with biopsy-proven AMR had significantly lower TTV levels compared to patients without.43 More recently, Gore et al. reported that TTV DNAemia measured in kidney graft recipients after the first-year post-transplantation (median time 4.9 years) correlated with the risk of all-cause and infectious mortality in multivariate analysis.44
Our study reinforces and extends the findings of our colleagues regarding the value of TTV DNAemia as a biomarker for long-term complications resulting from inadequate immunosuppression after renal transplantation. In a discovery cohort comprising 124 adult healthy volunteers and 34 renal transplant recipients beyond 12 months post-transplantation, all with detectable TTV DNAemia, we established lower and upper thresholds (3.75 log10 cp/mL and 5.1 log10 cp/mL) associated with, respectively, an increased risk of residual T-cell activatability and T-cell-dependent antibody response on one hand, and cancer, and infection on the other. In an independent validation cohort of 92 renal transplant recipients, we found that patients within the defined target range for more than 50% of the time points during the 3-year follow-up were less likely to develop complications. Importantly, it should be noted that the cutoff value of 50% of time points in the target range was defined post hoc. This allows for further refinement to determine the threshold that best identifies patients at risk of complications from suboptimal immunosuppression.
Although encouraging, our work has some limitations. The decision to exclude from the discovery cohort the recipients >70 years old (who represent ∼16% of renal transplantation in France in 2022) was meant to eliminate potential bias due to immunosenescence but does limit the generalizability of our results. Our single-center study would be strengthened by an external validation. Although in the same range of value, the established target for TTV DNAemia in our study does not fully align with previously published works. There are several possible and non-mutually exclusive explanations for this discrepancy. The value of TTV DNAemia depends upon the technique used for measurement. In our study, we used the CE-marked TTV R-GENE® kit, which showed excellent reproducibility and repeatability in precision studies.23 The fact that the upper threshold of the target range of TTV DNAemia was somewhat lower in our study is likely explained by our choice to focus the analysis on a later period post-transplantation. It shall also be noted that these thresholds are not universal and heavily depend upon the intended use of the biomarker (favoring specificity or sensitivity).40, 45
Published studies have reported varying levels of TTV DNAemia in transplant recipients based on their maintenance immunosuppressive regimens. It is unclear whether this reflects the immunosuppressive potency of different drug combinations or if there is another explanation. This distinction is crucial: if the first hypothesis is correct, a single target range for TTV DNAemia could be used across different regimens; if not, each drug combination would require a specific target range, hindering the use of TTV DNAemia as a biomarker. To investigate, we compared the relationship between TTV DNAemia and the residual activatability of various T lymphocyte subsets in patients on standard maintenance immunosuppression (tacrolimus/MMF) versus those on other immunosuppressive combinations. Our analysis suggests that the linear regression model established for the first group performs similarly for the second group (see Figure S1). However, it is important to note that the immunosuppressive regimens in our study were quite homogeneous, and it remains uncertain whether this conclusion holds for patients on different types of maintenance immunosuppression, such as those based on costimulation blockade like belatacept.
Lastly, the retrospective nature of TTV DNAemia measurements in our study prevented adaptive maintenance immunosuppression based on the biomarker. TTV GUIDE IT is a Phase II randomized trial under the European Union's Horizon 2020 program (grant agreement ID 896932). This trial enrolls kidney transplant recipients in seven European countries, testing the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTV-guided immunosuppression.46 Building on these results, our group has launched TAOIST (TTV-based mAnagement Of long-term ImmunosuppreSsion in kidney Transplantation), a randomized prospective study beyond 12 months post-transplantation. These parallel initiatives will hopefully shed lights on the value of longitudinal monitoring of TTV to guide the individual adaptation of maintenance regimen and prevent long-term complications of inadequate immunosuppression after renal transplantation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful to Mme Carole Janis and Mr Philippe Bourgeois, who provided expert guidance and enthusiastic support all along the conduction of the project.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
BioMerieux funded the study and performed the TTV DNAemia quantification blindly. BioMerieux was not involved in study design, collection and analysis of data, nor in the writing and decision to submit the paper for publication. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.