Volume 33, Issue 2 pp. 390-400
Original Research

Fast spin-echo triple echo dixon: Initial clinical experience with a novel pulse sequence for simultaneous fat-suppressed and nonfat-suppressed T2-weighted spine magnetic resonance imaging

Russell N. Low MD

Corresponding Author

Russell N. Low MD

Sharp and Children's MRI Center and San Diego Imaging Medical Group, Diego, California, USA

Sharp and Children's MRI Center and San Diego Imaging Medical Group, 7901 Frost St., San Diego, CA, 92123Search for more papers by this author
Matthew J. Austin MD

Matthew J. Austin MD

University of California at San Diego, Department of Radiology, San Diego, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jingfei Ma PhD

Jingfei Ma PhD

Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 January 2011
Citations: 31

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate a prototype fast spin-echo (FSE) triple-echo Dixon (FTED) technique for T2-weighted spine imaging with and without fat suppression compared to conventional T2-weighted fast recovery (FR) FSE and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) imaging.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-one patients were referred for spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including sagittal FTED (time 2:26), STIR (time 2:42), and T2 FRFSE (time 2:55). Two observers compared STIR and FTED water images and T2 FRFSE and FTED T2 images for overall image quality, fat suppression, anatomic sharpness, motion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow artifact, susceptibility, and disease depiction.

Results

On FTED images water and fat separation was perfect in 58 (.95) patients. Compared to STIR, the FTED water images demonstrated less motion in 57 (.93) of 61 patients (P < 0.05), better anatomic sharpness in 51 (.84) and patients (P < 0.05), and less CSF flow artifact in 7 (.11) P < 0.05) patients. There was no difference in fat suppression or chemical shift artifact. T2 FRFSE and FTED T2 images showed equivalent motion, CSF flow, and chemical shift artifact. Lesion depiction was equivalent on FTED water and STIR images and FTED T2 and T2 FRFSE images.

Conclusion

FTED efficiently provides both fat-suppressed and nonfat-suppressed T2-weighted spine images with excellent image quality, equal disease depiction, and 56% reduction in scan time compared to conventional STIR and T2 FRFSE. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:390–400. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.