Volume 25, Issue 5 pp. 974-981
Original Research

Assessing normal pulse wave velocity in the proximal pulmonary arteries using transit time: A feasibility, repeatability, and observer reproducibility study by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

William M. Bradlow BM, BS, MRCP

Corresponding Author

William M. Bradlow BM, BS, MRCP

Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Cardiovascular MR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UKSearch for more papers by this author
Peter D. Gatehouse PhD

Peter D. Gatehouse PhD

CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Ray L. Hughes MSc

Ray L. Hughes MSc

CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Aoife B. O'Brien PhD

Aoife B. O'Brien PhD

Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College Hospital, Galway, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
John S.R. Gibbs MD

John S.R. Gibbs MD

Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

National Pulmonary Hypertension Service, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
David N. Firmin PhD

David N. Firmin PhD

Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Raad H. Mohiaddin MD

Raad H. Mohiaddin MD

Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 April 2007
Citations: 34

Abstract

Purpose

To calculate pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the proximal pulmonary arteries (PAs) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) using the transit-time method, and address respiratory variation, repeatability, and observer reproducibility.

Materials and Methods

A 1.9-msec interleaved phase velocity sequence was repeated three times consecutively in 10 normal subjects. Pulse wave (PW) arrival times (ATs) were determined for the main and branch PAs. The PWV was calculated by dividing the path length traveled by the difference in ATs. Respiratory variation was considered by comparing acquisitions with and without respiratory gating.

Results

For navigated data the mean PWVs for the left PA (LPA) and right PA (RPA) were 2.09 ± 0.64 m/second and 2.33 ± 0.44 m/second, respectively. For non-navigated data the mean PWVs for the LPA and RPA were 2.14 ± 0.41 m/second and 2.31 ± 0.49 m/second, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between respiratory non-navigated data and navigated data. Repeated on-table measurements were consistent (LPA non-navigated P = 0.95, RPA non-navigated P = 0.91, LPA navigated P = 0.96, RPA navigated P = 0.51). The coefficients of variation (CVs) were 12.2% and 12.5% for intra- and interobserver assessments, respectively.

Conclusion

One can measure PWV in the proximal PAs using transit-time in a reproducible manner without respiratory gating. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;25:974–981. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.