Measuring coping style and resistance among Spanish and Argentine samples: Development of the Systematic Treatment Selection Self-Report in Spanish
Corresponding Author
Sergi Corbella
Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University
Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University, C. Cístter, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHéctor Fernández-Álvarez
Fundación Aiglé, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Search for more papers by this authorLuis Botella
Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sergi Corbella
Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University
Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University, C. Cístter, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHéctor Fernández-Álvarez
Fundación Aiglé, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Search for more papers by this authorLuis Botella
Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This article reports the reliability and validity of the Coping Style and Resistance subscales of the Systematic Treatment Selection Self-Report (STS-SR) scale after its translation to Spanish. The English versions of the STS system identify eight empirically derived patient variables that have been found to moderate the effects of various classes of mental health treatment procedures. Research on these dimensions as treatment indicators, as assessed both by clinicians and through patient self-reports, indicates that they increase the efficiency and effectiveness of treatment among English-speaking samples. This article reports a study of the convergent and discriminant validity of two of the subscales, Coping Style and Trait Resistance. The subscales were translated English into Spanish and administered to large Spanish and Argentinean subject pools, along with established measures of the same and related constructs. Results revealed that both scales possessed good internal consistency and adequate discriminant validity. The implications of these findings are discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.
REFERENCES
- American Psychiatric Association. ( 1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
- Beutler, L.E. ( 1989). Differential treatment selection: The role of diagnosis in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 26, 271–281.
- Beutler, L.E. ( 2001). Comparisons of quality assurance systems: From outcome assessment to clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 197–204.
- Beutler, L.E., & Clarkin, J.F. ( 1990). Systematic treatment selection: Toward targeted therapeutic interventions. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
-
Beutler, L.E.,
Clarkin, J.F., &
Bongar, B. (
2000).
Guidelines for the systematic treatment of the depressed patient.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195105308.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Beutler, L.E., Engle, D., Mohr, D., Daldrup, R.J., Bergan, J., Meredith, K., & Merry, W. ( 1991). Predictors of differential and self-directed psychotherapeutic procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 333–340.
- Beutler, L.E., Goodrich, G., Fisher, D., & Williams, O.B. ( 1999). Use of psychological tests/instruments for treatment planning. In M.E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological tests for treatment planning and outcome assessment ( 2nd ed., pp. 81–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
-
Beutler, L.E., &
Harwood, T.M. (
2000).
Prescriptive psychotherapy.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
10.1093/med:psych/9780195136692.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Beutler, L.E., Harwood, T.M., Alimohamed, S., & Malik, M. ( 2002). Functional impairment and coping style. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs (pp. 145–170). New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Beutler, L.E., &
Malik, M.L. (
2002).
Diagnosis and treatment guidelines: The example of depression. In
L.E. Beutler &
M.L. Malik (Eds.),
Rethinking the DSM (pp. 251–277).
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
10.1037/10456-010 Google Scholar
- Beutler, L.E., Moleiro, C., Malik, M., & Harwood, T.M. (in press). A new twist on empirically supported treatments. Revista Internacional de Psicologia Clinica y de la Salud.
- Beutler, L.E., Moleiro, C., Malik, M., Harwood, T.M., Romanelli, R., Gallagher-Thompson, D., & Thompson, L. ( 2003). A comparison of the Dodo, EST, and ATI predictors among co-morbid stimulant dependent, depressed patients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10, 69–85.
- Beutler, L.E., Moleiro, C., & Talebi, H. ( 2002). Resistance. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs (pp. 129–144). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Beutler, L.E., & Williams, O.B. ( 1995, July/August). Computer applications for the selection of optimal psychosocial therapeutic interventions. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 66, 68.
- Brehm, S.S., & Brehm, J. ( 1981). Psychological Reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
- Butcher, J.N., & Beutler, L.E. (in press). Interpretations of the MMPI-2. In L.E. Beutler & G. Groth-Marnat (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
- Caine, T.M., Wijesinghe, O.B.A., & Winter, D.A. ( 1981). Personal styles in neurosis: Implications for small group psychotherapy and behaviour therapy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Calvert, S.J., Beutler, L.E., & Crago, M. ( 1988). Psychotherapy outcome as a function of therapist-patient matching on selected variables. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 104–117.
- Carson, R.C. ( 1997). Costly compromises: A critique of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. In S. Fisher & R.P. Greenberg (Eds.), From placebo to panacea: Putting psychiatric drugs to the test (pp. 98–112). New York: Wiley.
- Corbella, S., Garcia, F., Botella, L., & Keena, C. ( 2001, June). Compatibility between therapist's personal style and patient's personality. The Barcelona–Buenos Aires Project. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Society for Psychotherapy Research, Montevideo, Uruguay.
- Derogatis, L.R. ( 1977). The SCL-90 manual I: Scoring, administration and procedures. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Clinical Psychometrics Unit.
- Dowd, E.T., Milne, C.R., & Wise, S.L. ( 1991). The Therapeutic Reactance Scale: A measure of psychological reactance. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 541–545.
-
Eysenck, H.J., &
Eysenck, S.B.G. (
1962).
A factorial study of an interview-questionnaire.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18, 286–290.
10.1002/1097-4679(196207)18:3<286::AID-JCLP2270180311>3.0.CO;2-U CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B.G. ( 1973). Cuestionario de Personalidad EPI. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones TEA.
-
Fisher, D.,
Beutler, L.E., &
Williams, O.B. (
1999).
Making assessment relevant to treatment planning: The STS Clinician Rating Form.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 825–842.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199907)55:7<825::AID-JCLP5>3.0.CO;2-3 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Frances, A., Clarkin, J., & Perry, S. ( 1984). Differential therapeutics in psychiatry. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
- Gough, H. ( 1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Harwood, T.M., & Williams, O.B. (in press). Identifying treatment relevant assessment: The STS. In L.E. Beutler & G. Groth-Marnat (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
- Hathaway, S.R., & McKinley, J.C. ( 1961). Cuestionario de Personalidad MMPI. Madrid: Secc. de Estudios de TEA ed. 1975.
- Hathaway, S.R., & McKinley, J.C. ( 2000). Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota-2. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones TEA.
-
Houts, A.C. (
2002).
Discovery, invention, and the expansion of the modern Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals of Mental Disorders. In
L.E. Beutler &
M.L. Malik (Eds.),
Rethinking the DSM: Psychological perspectives (pp. 17–65).
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Press.
10.1037/10456-002 Google Scholar
- Kadden, R.M., Cooney, N.L., Getter, H., & Litt, M.D. ( 1990). Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: Posttreatment results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 698–704.
- Karno, M., Beutler, L.E., & Harwood, T.M. ( 2002). Interactions between psychotherapy process and patient attributes that predict alcohol treatment effectiveness: A preliminary report. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 779–797.
- Lazarus, A.A. ( 1976). Multimodal behavior therapy. New York: Springer.
- Leach v. Braillar, 275 F. Supp. 897, 537 S.W.2d (D. Ariz. 1967).
- Millon, T. ( 1987). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–II: Manual for the MCMI-II. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
- Millon, T. ( 1997). MCMI-2. Inventario Clínico Multiaxial de Millon. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.
- Norcross, J.C. ( 1994). Prescriptive eclectic psychotherapy [Videotape]. APA Psychotherapy Videotape Series. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- J.C. Norcross (Ed.). ( 2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Shoham-Salomon, V., & Hannah, M.T. ( 1991). Client–treatment interactions in the study of differential change processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 217–225.
- Snow, R.E. ( 1991). Aptitude–treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 205–216.
- Welsh, G.S. ( 1952). An anxiety index and internalization ratio for the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 65–72.