Volume 59, Issue 9 pp. 921-932
Research Article

Measuring coping style and resistance among Spanish and Argentine samples: Development of the Systematic Treatment Selection Self-Report in Spanish

Sergi Corbella

Corresponding Author

Sergi Corbella

Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University

Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University, C. Cístter, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Larry E. Beutler

Larry E. Beutler

Pacific Graduate School of Psychology

Search for more papers by this author
Héctor Fernández-Álvarez

Héctor Fernández-Álvarez

Fundación Aiglé, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Search for more papers by this author
Luis Botella

Luis Botella

Blanquera Faculty of Psychology, Ramon Llull University

Search for more papers by this author
Mary L. Malik

Mary L. Malik

University of California, Santa Barbara

Search for more papers by this author
Geoffrey Lane

Geoffrey Lane

Pacific Graduate School of Psychology

Search for more papers by this author
Nicole Wagstaff

Nicole Wagstaff

Pacific Graduate School of Psychology

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 July 2003
Citations: 8

Abstract

This article reports the reliability and validity of the Coping Style and Resistance subscales of the Systematic Treatment Selection Self-Report (STS-SR) scale after its translation to Spanish. The English versions of the STS system identify eight empirically derived patient variables that have been found to moderate the effects of various classes of mental health treatment procedures. Research on these dimensions as treatment indicators, as assessed both by clinicians and through patient self-reports, indicates that they increase the efficiency and effectiveness of treatment among English-speaking samples. This article reports a study of the convergent and discriminant validity of two of the subscales, Coping Style and Trait Resistance. The subscales were translated English into Spanish and administered to large Spanish and Argentinean subject pools, along with established measures of the same and related constructs. Results revealed that both scales possessed good internal consistency and adequate discriminant validity. The implications of these findings are discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.