Volume 35, Issue 1 pp. 9-17
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Efficacy of Evolocumab vs low-density lipoprotein cholesterol apheresis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and high cardiovascular risk (EVOLAFER01)

Esther Torres

Corresponding Author

Esther Torres

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence

Esther Torres, Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Marian Goicoechea

Marian Goicoechea

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Spanish Research Network (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Andrés Hernández

Andrés Hernández

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
María L. Rodríguez Ferrero

María L. Rodríguez Ferrero

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ana García

Ana García

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Nicolás Macías

Nicolás Macías

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Fernando Anaya

Fernando Anaya

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 October 2019
Citations: 9

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has been considered the last option to treat refractory hyperlipidemia in patients with familiar hypercholesterolemia (FH). Evolocumab is a monoclonal antibody which has shown significant reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) serum levels and cardiovascular events.

The aim of the study was to examine the comparative impact of LDL-apheresis vs Evolocumab vs the combination of both LDL-apheresis and Evolocumab on lipid and lipoprotein parameters, and other metabolic/inflammatory measures.

Design of the study

Non-randomized open case series study of 10 adult patients diagnosed with FH already on long-term LDL-apheresis therapy. The study was developed in three consecutive phases to compare LDL-apheresis, Evolocumab treatment and the combination of both. Laboratory parameters were collected pre and post LDL-apheresis and before Evolocumab administration. The primary endpoint was the reduction of LDL-C during the three phases.

Results

Reduction of LDL-C levels with Evolocumab were 31.4% vs LDL-apheresis from 153 ± 35 mg/dL to 105 ± 56 mg/dL (P < .001). Reduction of Lp(a) was also significantly higher with Evolocumab (45.5%) than LDL-apheresis from 36 (6-119) to 20 (3-41) mg/dL, P = .027. In addition, HDL-C and apo-A increased after Evolocumab treatment, from 41 ± 6 to 46 ± 8 mg/dL (P = .003) and from 124 ± 13 to 144 ± 25 mg/dL (P = .001), respectively. No changes in immunological or inflammatory parameters were observed and no serious adverse events were recorded.

Conclusion

Evolocumab reduces LDL-C and Lp(a) more effectively than LDL-apheresis and combination of Evolocumab plus LDL-apheresis could be a therapeutic alternative to get lower LDL-C and Lp(a) levels in patients with very high cardiovascular risk.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.