The effect of impact direction on the structural capacity of the proximal femur during falls
Catherine M. Ford
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Harvard Thorndike Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorTony M. Keaveny
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A. and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wilson C. Hayes Ph.D.
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Harvard Thorndike Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory Beth Israel Hospital 330 Brookline Avenue, RN115 Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorCatherine M. Ford
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Harvard Thorndike Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorTony M. Keaveny
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A. and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wilson C. Hayes Ph.D.
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Harvard Thorndike Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory Beth Israel Hospital 330 Brookline Avenue, RN115 Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
As with any structure, the structural capacity of the proximal femur depends on the applied loads and these can vary as a function of impact direction during a fall. However, despite its potential importance in hip fracture risk assessment, the relative importance of impact direction is unknown. To investigate the role of impact direction in hip fracture, we developed a detailed finite element model of the proximal femur. We analyzed four loading configurations that represent a range of possible falls on the greater trochanter. Our results indicate that a change in the angle between the line of action of the applied force and the axis of the femoral neck from 0° (representing a direct lateral impact) to 45° (representing a posterolateral impact) reduced structural capacity by 26%. This weakening of the femur with changes in impact direction is comparable to the weakening associated with 2–3 decades of age-related bone loss. Our result elucidates the independent contribution of fall mechanics to hip fracture risk by identifying an aspect of the fall (the direction of impact) that is an important determinant of fall severity. The results can also be incorporated into a refined clinical method for assessment of hip fracture risk that accounts for the complex interactions between fall severity and bone fragility.
References
- 1 Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Johnson KA, Melton LJ 1982 Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. J Clin Invest 70: 716–723.
- 2 Steiger P, Cummings SR, Black DM, Spencer NE, Genant HK 1992 Age-related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65. J Bone Miner Res 7: 625–632.
- 3 Courtney AC, Wachtel EF, Myers ER, Hayes WC 1994 Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur. Calcif Tissue Int 55: 53–58.
- 4 Alho A, Husby T, Hoiseth A 1988 Bone mineral content and mechanical strength: An ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy. Clin Orthop 227: 292–297.
- 5 Esses SI, Lotz JC, Hayes WC 1989 Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single-energy quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4: 715–722.
- 6 Lotz JC, Hayes WC 1990 The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 72: 689–700.
- 7 Courtney AC, Wachtel EF, Myers ER, Hayes WC 1995 Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall loading configuration. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 77: 387–395.
- 8 Weber TG, Yang KH, Woo R, Fitzgerald RH 1992 Proximal femur strength: Correlation of the rate of loading and bone mineral density. ASME Adv Bioeng 22: 111–114.
- 9 Riggs BL, Melton LJ 1986 Involutional osteoporosis. New Engl J Med 314: 1676–1686.
- 10 Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC 1990 Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA 263: 665–668.
- 11 Hedlund R, Lindgren U 1987 Trauma type, age and gender as determinants of hip fracture. J Orthop Res 5: 242–246.
- 12 Tinetti ME 1987 Factors associated with serious injury during falls among elderly persons living in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 35: 644–648.
- 13 Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, Black D 1989 Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls: A prospective study. JAMA 261: 2663–2668.
- 14 Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA, Resnick NM, Hayes WC 1994 Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. JAMA 271: 128–133.
- 15 Hayes WC, Myers ER, Morris JN, Gerhart TN, Yett HS, Lipsitz LA 1993 Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall. Calcif Tissue Int 52: 192–198.
- 16 Nevitt MC, Cummings SR 1993 Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: The study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 41: 1226–1234.
- 17 Myers ER, Hayes WC 1994 Age-related hip fractures. Curr Opin Orthopaed 5: 9–15.
- 18 Hayes WC, Myers ER 1994 Biomechanics of age-related fracture risk. In: BL Riggs, LJ Melton (ed.) Osteoporosis: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Raven Press, New York.
- 19 Smith LD 1953 The role of muscle contraction or intrinsic forces in the causation of fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 35: 367–383.
- 20 Lotz JC, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC 1991 Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part 1-Linear analysis. J Biomech Eng 113: 353–360.
- 21 Lotz JC, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC 1991 Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part 2-Nonlinear analysis. J Biomech Eng 113: 361–365.
- 22 Wahner HW, Fogelman I 1994 The Evaluation of Osteoporosis: Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
- 23 Edidin AA 1991 Modeling of bone material properties from CT scans—Considerations in biomechanical structural models. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University. Ithaca, New York.
- 24 Keaveny TM, Bartel DL 1993 Effects of porous coating and collar support on early load transfer for a cementless hip prosthesis. J Biomech 26: 1205–1216.
- 25 Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC 1990 Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comp Assist Tomog 14: 107–114.
- 26 Hvid I, Bentzen SM, Linde F, Mosekilde L, Pongsoipetch B 1989 X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 22: 837–844.
- 27 Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Kuhn JL, Cody DD 1991 Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9: 674–682.
- 28 Brown TD, Ferguson AB 1978 The development of a computational stress analysis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 60: 619–629.
- 29 Reilly DT, Burstein AH 1975 The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8: 393–405.
- 30 Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA 1988 On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21: 155–168.
- 31 Snyder SM, Schneider E 1991 Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9: 422–431.
- 32 van den Kroonenberg A, Hayes WC, McMahon TA 1996 Hip impact velocities and body configurations for experimental falls from standing height. J Biomech (in press).
- 33 Bouxsein M, Courtney A, Hayes W 1995 Ultrasound and densitometry of the calcaneus correlate with the failure loads of cadaveric femurs. Calcif Tissue Int 56: 99–103.
- 34 Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Ford CM, Hayes WC 1994 Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech 27: 1137–1146.
- 35 Yoshikawa T, Turner CH, Peacock M, Slemenda CW, Weaver CM, Teegarden D, Markwardt P, Burr DB 1994 Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 9: 1053–1064.
- 36 Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE, Scott WW, Rao GU 1990 Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data: A structural approach. Invest Radiol 25: 6–18.
- 37 Pinilla T, Boardman R, Bouxsein M, Myers E, Hayes W 1996 Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the femur as much as age-related bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int (in press).
- 38
Snyder BD,
Hayes WC
1990
Multiaxial structure-property relations in trabecular bone. In:
VC Mow,
A Ratcliffe,
SL-Y Woo (eds.)
Biomechanics of Diarthrodial Joints,
Vol. 2.
Springer-Verlag, New York,
pp. 31–59.
10.1007/978-1-4612-3450-0_2 Google Scholar
- 39 Vahey JW, Lewis JL, Vanderby R 1987 Elastic moduli, yield stress, and ultimate stress of cancellous bone in the canine proximal femur. J Biomech 20: 29–33.
- 40 Mazess RB 1982 On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop 165: 239–252.
- 41 Myers E, Robinovitch S, Greenspan S, Hayes W 1994 Factor of risk is associated with frequency of hip fracture in a case-control study. Trans 40th ORS 19: 526.
- 42 Robinovitch SN, McMahon TA, Hayes WC 1995 Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissues during impact from a fall. J Orthop Res 13: 956–962.
- 43 Maitland L, Myers E, Hipp J, Hayes W, Greenspan S 1993 Read my hips: Measuring trochanteric soft tissue thickness. Calcif Tissue Int 52: 85–89.
