Histometric analysis and topographic characterization of cp Ti implants with surfaces modified by laser with and without silica deposition
Corresponding Author
Francisley Á. Souza
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Correspondence to: F.A. Souza (e-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorThallita P. Queiroz
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCelso K. Sonoda
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorRoberta Okamoto
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorRogério Margonar
Department of Health Sciense, University Center of Araraquara – UNIARA, Araraquara, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAntônio C. Guastaldi
Department of Physical Chemistry, Biomaterials Group, Institute of Chemistry, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorRenato S. Nishioka
Department of Dental Materials and Prothesis, São José dos Campos of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, São José dos Campos, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorIdelmo R. Garcia Júnior
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Francisley Á. Souza
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Correspondence to: F.A. Souza (e-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorThallita P. Queiroz
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCelso K. Sonoda
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorRoberta Okamoto
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorRogério Margonar
Department of Health Sciense, University Center of Araraquara – UNIARA, Araraquara, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAntônio C. Guastaldi
Department of Physical Chemistry, Biomaterials Group, Institute of Chemistry, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorRenato S. Nishioka
Department of Dental Materials and Prothesis, São José dos Campos of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, São José dos Campos, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorIdelmo R. Garcia Júnior
Department of Surgery and General Clinic, Araçatuba of Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Biologic behavior of the bone tissue around implants with four different surfaces was evaluated. The surfaces were: modified by laser (LS); modified by laser with sodium silicate deposition (SS); and commercially available surfaces modified by acid etching (AS) and machined surface (MS). Topographic characterization of the surfaces was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)– energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) before experimental surgery. Thirty rabbits received 60 implants in their right and left tibias, 1 implant of each surface being placed in each tibia. The analyzed periods were 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Histometric analysis was performed evaluating bone interface contact (BIC) and bone area (BA). The results obtained were submitted to the analysis of variance and the Tukey t-test. The elemental mapping was evaluated by means of SEM at 4 weeks postoperatively. The topographic characterization showed differences between the analyzed surfaces. Generally, the BIC and BA of LS and SS implants were statistically higher than those of AS and MS in most of the analyzed periods. Elemental mapping showed high peaks of calcium and phosphorous in all groups. Based on the present methodology, it may be concluded that experimental modifications LS and SS accelerated the stages of the bone tissue repair process around the implants, providing the highest degree of osseointegration. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B:1677–1688, 2014.
REFERENCES
- 1Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 21–24.
- 2Kesser-Liechti G, Zix J, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the edentulous mandible by means of resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 353–358.
- 3Faeda RS, Tavares HA, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantônio-Jr E. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associate with implant surface modification by laser beam: Biomechanical study in rabbit tibiae. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 1706–1715.
- 4Thomas K, Cook SD. Relationship between surface characteristics and the degree of bone-implant integration. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 26: 831–833.
- 5Xavier SP, Carvalho PSP, Beloti MM, Rosa AL. Response of rat bone marrow cells to commercially pure titanium submitted to different surface treatments. J Dent 2003; 31: 173–180.
- 6Qahash M, Hardwick R, Rohrer MD, Wozney JM, Wikesjö, UM. Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 472–477.
- 7Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantônio-Jr E. Evaluation of titanium implants with surface modification by laser beam. Biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23: 137–143.
- 8Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 889–902.
- 9de Molon RS, Morais-Camilo JA, Verzola MH, Faeda RS, Pepato MT, Marcantonio E Jr. Impact of diabetes mellitus and metabolic control on bone healing around osseointegrated implants: Removal torque and histomorphometric analysis in rats. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 831–837.
- 10Oliveira JA, Abrahão M, Dib LL. Extraoral implants in irradiated patients. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 79: 185–189.
- 11Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjorting-Hansen E. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1223–1231.
- 12Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants with different surface characteristics subjected to static load. a study in the dog (II). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 196–201.
- 13Lima LA, Fuchs-Wehrle AM, Lang NP, Hammerle CH, Liberti E, Pompeu E, Todescan JH. Surface characteristics of implants influence their bone integration after simultaneous placement of implant and GBR membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 669–679.
- 14Piattelli A, Scarano A, DI Alberti L, Piatteli M. Histological and histochemical analysis of acid and alkaline phosphatases around hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A time course study in rabbit. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 1191–1194.
- 15Uehara T, Takaoka K, Ito K. Histological evidence of osseointegration in human retrieved fractured hydroxyapatite-coated screw-type implants: A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 540–545.
- 16Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 442–447.
- 17Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJA. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 24–30.
- 18Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 252–259.
- 19Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Albandar JM, Hall J, Wikesjo UM. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 105–111.
- 20Gaggl A, Schultes G, Muller, WD, Karcher H. Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces – a comparative study. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1067–1073.
- 21Cho SA, Jung SK. A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4859–4863.
- 22Braga FJC, Marques RFC, Filho EA, Guastaldi AC. Surface modification of Ti dental implants by Nd:YVO4 laser irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 2007; 253: 9203–9208.
- 23Tavares HS, Faeda RS, Guastaldi AC, Guastaldi FPS, Oliveira NTC, Marcantônio-Jr E. SEM-EDS and biomechanical evaluation of implants with different surface treatments: An initial study. J Osseointegration 2009; 1: 25–31.
- 24Sisti KE, Piattelli A, Guastaldi AC, Queiroz TP, de Rossi R. Nondecalcified histologic study of bone response to titanium implants topographically modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013; 35: 689–696.
10.11607/prd.1151 Google Scholar
- 25Souza FÁ, Queiroz TP, Guastaldi AC, Garcia-Jr IR, Magro-Filho O, Nishioka RS, Sisti KE, Sonada CK. Comparative in vivo study of commercially pure Ti implants with surfaces modified by laser with and without silicate deposition: Biomechanical and scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Biomed Mater Res B 2013; 101: 76–84.
- 26Queiroz TP, Souza FÁ, Guastaldi AC, Margonar R, Garcia-Jr IR, Hochuli-Vieira E. Commercially pure titanium implants with surfaces modified by laser beam with and without chemical deposition of apatite. Biomechanical and topographical analysis in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 896–903.
- 27Vajtai R, Beleznai C, Nánai L, Gingl Z, George TF. Nonlinear aspects of laser-driven oxidation of metals. Appl Surf Sci 1996; 106: 247–257.
- 28Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2161–2175.
- 29Schepers EJ, Ducheine P, Barbier L, Schepers S. Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range: A new material for the repair of bone defects. Implant Dent 1993; 2: 151–156.
- 30Chen QZ, Li Y, Jin LY, Quinn JM, Komesaroff PA. A new sol-gel process for producing Na(2)O-containing bioactive glass-ceramics. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 4143–4153.
- 31Suzuki M, Guimarães MVM, Marin C, Granato R, Fernades CA, Gil JN, Coelho PG. Histomorphologic and bone-to-implant contact evaluation of dual acid-etched and bioceramic grit-blasted implant surfaces: An experimental study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1877–1883.
- 32Coelho PG, Granato R, Marin C, Bonfante EA, Freire JN, Janal MN, Gil JN, Suzuki M. Biomechanical evaluation of endosseous implants at early implantation times: A study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1667–1675.
- 33Cooper LFA. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 522–534.
- 34Stach RM, Kohles, SS. A meta-analysis examining the clinical survivability of machined surface and osseotite implants in poor-quality bone. Implant Dent 2003; 12: 87–96.
- 35Sandrini E, Giordano C, Busini V, Signorelli E, Cigada A. Apatite formation and cellular response of a novel bioactive titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 1225–1237.
- 36Leventhal GS. Titanium, a metal for surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 1951; 33A: 473–474.
- 37Bränemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3: 81–100.
- 38Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit. A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 69–75.
- 39Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LEA. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 62–71.
- 40Van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I. The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the reabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 272–281.
- 41Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated implants: A three-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 91–100.
- 42Mendes VC, Moeineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of the discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4748–4755.
- 43Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Andersson M, Kjellin P, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87A: 299–307.
- 44Meirelles L, Currie F, Jacobsson M, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 641–647.
- 45Aparecida AH, Fook MV, Guastaldi AC. Biomimetic apatite formation on ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) using modified biomimetic solution. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 12151222.
- 46Bloebaum RD, Beeks D, Dorr LD, Savory CG, DuPont JA, Hofmann AA. Complications with hydroxyapatite particulate separation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 298: 109–118.
- 47Albrektsson T. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A case against their use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 1312–1326.
- 48Koeppen BM, Stanton BA. Renal Physiology: Berne & Levy Physiology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007. pp 701–710.