Electronic properties of anodized TiO2 electrodes and the effect on in vitro response
Johanna Löberg
Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden
Dentsply Implants, Box 14, SE-431 21, Mölndal, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorChristina Gretzer
Dentsply Implants, Box 14, SE-431 21, Mölndal, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorIngela Mattisson
Dentsply Implants, Box 14, SE-431 21, Mölndal, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Elisabet Ahlberg
Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden
Correspondence to: E. Ahlberg (e-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorJohanna Löberg
Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden
Dentsply Implants, Box 14, SE-431 21, Mölndal, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorChristina Gretzer
Dentsply Implants, Box 14, SE-431 21, Mölndal, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorIngela Mattisson
Dentsply Implants, Box 14, SE-431 21, Mölndal, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Elisabet Ahlberg
Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden
Correspondence to: E. Ahlberg (e-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
For dental implants, improved osseointegration is obtained by modifying the surface roughness as well as oxide morphology and composition. A combination of different effects contributes to enhanced performance, but with surface roughness as the dominant factor. To single out the effect of oxide conductivity on biological response, oxide films with similar thickness and surface roughness but different electronic properties were formed using galvanostatic anodization. Three different current densities were used, 2.4, 4.8, and 11.9 mA cm−2, which resulted in growth rates ranging from 0.2 to 2.5 V s−1. The electronic properties were evaluated using cyclic voltammetry and impedance spectroscopy, while the biological response was studied by cell activity and apatite formation. The number of charge carrier in the oxide film close to the oxide/solution interface decreased from 5.8 × 10−19 to 3.2 × 10−19 cm−2 with increasing growth rate, that is, the conductivity decreased correspondingly. Cell response of the different surfaces was tested in vitro using human osteoblast-like cells (MG-63). The results clearly show decreased osteoblast proliferation and adhesion but higher mineralization activity for the oxide with lower conductivity at the oxide/solution interface. The apatite-forming ability was examined by immersion in simulated body fluid. At short times the apatite coverage was ∼26% for the anodized surfaces, significantly larger than for the reference with only 3% coverage. After 1 week of immersion the apatite coverage ranged from 73 to 56% and a slight differentiation between the anodized surfaces was obtained with less apatite formation on the surface with lower conductivity, in line with the cell culture results. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 826–839, 2014.
REFERENCES
- 1Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Metal selection and surface characteristics. In: PI Brånemark, GA Zarb, and T. Alberktsson Eds., Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, Quintessence, Chicago, 1985. pp 99–116.
- 2de Jonge LT, Leeuwenburgh CG, Wolke JGC, Jansen JA. Organic–inorganic surface modifications for titanium implant surfaces. Pharmac Res 2008; 25: 2357–2369.
- 3Raikar GN, Gregory JC, Ong JL, Lucas LC, Lemons JE, Kawahara D, Nakamura M. Surface characterization of titanium implants. J Vac Sci Technol A 1995; 13: 2633–2637.
- 4Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor MPT. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
- 5Pan J, Liao H, Leygraf C, Thierry D, Li J. Variation of oxide films on titanium induced by osteoblast-like cell culture and the influence of an H2O2 pretreatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 244–256.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<244::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-L CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 6Nayab SN, Jones FH, Olsen I. Effects of calcium ion implantation on human bone cell interaction with titanium. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4717–4727.
- 7Sul Y, Johansson CB, Kang Y, Jeon D, Albrektsson T. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002; 4: 78–87.
- 8Sul Y, Johansson C, Byon E, Albrektsson T. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 6720–6730.
- 9Ellingsen JE. Pre-treatment of titanium implants with fluoride improves their retention in bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995; 6: 749–753.
- 10Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, Guo J, Abron A, Holmen A, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 926–936.
- 11Zakiah IM, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford CM. Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression. Int J Oral Max Implant 2006; 21: 2003–2211.
- 12Scharnweber D, Beutner R, Rössler S, Worch H. Electrochemical behavior of titanium-based materials—Are there relations to biocompatibility? J Mater Sci Mater Med2002; 13: 1215–1220.
- 13Huang N, Yang P, Leng YX, Chen JY, Sun H, Wang J, Wang GJ, Ding PD, Xi TF, Leng Y. Hemocompatibility of titanium oxide films. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2177–2187.
- 14Chen JY, Leng YX, Tian XB, Wang LP, Huang N, Chu PK, Yang P. Antithrombogenic investigation of surface energy and optical bandgap and hemocompatibility mechanism of Ti(Ta+5)O2 thin films. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2545–2552.
- 15Huang N, Yang P, Cheng X, Leng Y, Zheng X, Cai G, Zhen Z, Zhang F, Chen Y, Liu X, Xi T. Blood compatibility of amorphous titanium oxide films synthesized by ion beam enhanced deposition. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 771–776.
- 16Pettersson IU, Löberg JL, Fredriksson AS, Ahlberg EK. Semi-conducting properties of titanium dioxide surfaces on titanium implants. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4471–4479.
- 17Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Boström-Junemo K, Holmen A, Hansson S. In vivo comparison of TiO2 blasted- and fluoride modified implants in rabbit bone. 7th World Biomaterials Congress. Sydney; 2004.
- 18Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Max Implant 2004; 19: 659–666.
- 19Roh B, Macdonald DD. Effect of oxygen vacancies in anodic titanium oxide films on the kinetics of the oxygen electrode reaction. Russ J Electrochem 2007; 43: 125–135.
- 20 MeX. Alicona Imaging Gmbh. 5.0 ed. Graz, Austria 2007.
- 21Hansson S, Löberg J, Mattisson I, Ahlberg E. Characterisation of titanium dental implants II: Local biomechanical model. Open Biomater J 2010; 2: 36–52.
10.2174/1876502501002010036 Google Scholar
- 22Löberg J, Mattisson I, Hansson S, Ahlberg E. Characterisation of titanium dental implants I: Critical assessment of surface roughness parameters. Open Biomater J 2010; 2: 18–35.
- 23Oyane A, Kim HM, Furuya T, Kokubo T, Miyazaki T, Nakamura T. Preparation and assessment of revised body fluids. J Biomech Mater Res A 2003; 65: 188–195.
- 24Habazaki H, Uozumi M, Konno H, Shimizu K, Skeldon P, Thompson GE. Crystallization of anodic titania on titanium and its alloys. Corr Sci 2003; 45: 2063–2073.
- 25Gaul E. Coloring titanium and related metals by electrochemical oxidation. J Chem Ed 1993; 70: 176–178.
- 26Hansson S, Löberg J, Mattisson I, Ahlberg E. Global biomechanical model for dental implants. J Biomech 2011; 44: 1059–1065.
- 27Proost J, Vanhumbeeck J-F, van Overmeere Q. Instability of anodically formed TiO2 layers (revisited). Electrochim Acta 2009; 55: 350–357.
- 28Vanhumbeeck J-F, Ryeland L, Proost J. On the relationship between local voltage maxima and efficiency changes during galvaostatic Ti anodising. Electrochim Acta 2009; 54: 3330–3338.
- 29Van Overmeere Q, Vanhumbeeck J-F, Proost J. Effect of current density on the internal stress evolution during galvanostatic Ti thin film anodization. J Electrochem Soc 2010; 157: C166–C73.
- 30Blackwood DJ, Peter LM. The influence of growth rate on the properties of anodic films on titanium. Electrochim Acta 1989; 34: 1505–1511.
- 31Ohtsuka T, Otsuki T. The influence of the growth rate on the semiconducting properties of titanium anodic oxide films. Corr Sci 1998; 40: 951–958.
- 32Abayev I, Zaban A, Kytin VG. Properties of the electronic density of states in TiO2 nanoparticles surrounded with aqueous electrolyte. J Solid State Electrochem 2007; 11: 647–653.
- 33Ardizzone S, Cappelleti G, Minguzzi A, Rondinini S, Vertova A. TiO2 nanocrystal particles and electrodes. The combined role of pH and metal substrate. J Electroanal Chem 2008; 621: 185–197.
- 34Berger T, Lana-Villarreal T, Monllor-Satoca D, Gómez R. An electrochemical study on the nature of trap states in nanocrystalline rutile thin films. J Phys Chem C 2007; 111: 9936–9942.
- 35Fabregat-Santiago F, Mora-Seró I, Garcia-Belmonte G, Bisquert J. Cyclic voltammetry studies of nanoporous semiconductors. Capacitive and reactive properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes in aqueous electrolyte. J Phys Chem B 2003; 107: 758–768.
- 36Lana-Villarreal T, Mao Y, Wong SS, Gómez R. Photoelectrochemical behaviour of anatase nanoporous films: Effect of the nanoparticle organization. Nanoscale 2010; 2: 1690–1698.
- 37Berger T, Lana-Villarreal T, Monllor-Satoca D, Gómez R. Charge transfer reductive doping of nanostructured TiO2 thin films as a way to improve their photoelectrocatalytic performance. Electrochem Comm 2006; 8: 1713–1718.
- 38Kytin VG, Bisquert J, Abayev I, Zaban A. Determination of density of electronic states using the potential dependence of electron denisty measured at nonzero temperatures. Phys Rev B 2004; 70: 193304.
- 39Brug GJ, van den Eeden ALG, Sluyters-Rehbach M, Sluyters JH. The analysis of electrode impedance comlicated by the presence of a constant phase element. J Electroanal Chem 1984; 176: 275–295.
- 40Hirschorn B, Orazem ME, Tribollet B, Vivier V, Frateur I, Musiani M. Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters. Electrochim Acta 2010; 55: 6218–6227.
- 41Baumanis C, Bahnemann DW. TiO2 thin film electrodes: Correlation between photocatalytic activity and electrochemical properties. J Phys Chem C 2008; 112: 19097.
- 42Goossens A, Vazquez M, Macdonald DD. The nature of electronic states in anodic zirconium oxide films. Part 2. Photoelectrochemical characterization. Electrochim Acta 1996; 41: 47.
- 43Munoz AG. Semiconducting properties of self-organized TiO2 nanotubes. Electrochim Acta 2007; 52: 4167.
- 44Radecka M, Rekas M, Trenczek-Zajac A, Zakrzewska K. Importance of the band gap energy and flat band potential for application of modified TiO2 photoanodes in water photolysis. J Power Sources 2008; 181: 46–55.
- 45Sikora J, Sikora E, Macdonald DD. The electrocnic structure of the passive film on tungsten. Electrochim Acta 2000; 45: 1875–1883.
- 46Bonham DB, Orazem ME. A matematical model for the influence of deep-level electronic states on photoelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy. II. Assessment of characterization methods based on Mott-Schottky theory. J Electrochem Soc 1992; 139: 127.
- 47Tomkiewicz M. The potential distribution at the titanium dioxide aqueous electrolyte interface. J Electrochem Soc 1979; 126: 1505.
- 48Dolata M, Kedzierzawaski P, Augustynski J. Comparative impedance spectroscopy study of rutile and anatase TiO2 film electrodes. Electrochim Acta 1996; 41: 1287–1293.
- 49Boschloo G, Fitzmaurice D. Electron accumulation in nanostructure TiO2 (Anatase) electrodes. J Phys Chem B 1999; 103: 7860–7868.
- 50Rothenberger G, Fitzmaurice D, Grätzel M. Spectroscopy of conduction band electrons in transparent metal oxide semiconductor films: Optical determination of the flatband potential of colloid titanium dioxide films. J Phys Chem 1992; 96: 5983–5986.
- 51Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2821–2829.
- 52Olivares-Navarrete R, Raz P, Zhao GJC, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Chaudhri RA, Ornoy A, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Integrin alpha2beta1 plays a critical role in osteoblast response to micron-scale surface structure and surface energy of titanium substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 15767–15772.
- 53Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 667–681.
- 54Lange R, Elter P, Biala K, Matschegewiski C, Stählke S, Löffler R, Fleischer M, Nebe JGB, Kern D, Beck U. Titanium surfaces structured with regular geometry—Material investigations and cell morphology. Surf Interface Anal 2010; 42: 497–501.
- 55Lange R, Luethen F, Nebe JGB, Rychly J, Beck U. Mathematical correlation between biomaterial and cellular parameters—Critical reflection of statistics. Biomol Eng 2007; 24: 526–530.
- 56Nebe JGB, Luethen F, Lange R, Beck U. Interface interactions of osteoblasts with structured titanium and the correlation between physicochemical characteristics and cell biological parameters. Macromol Biosci 2007; 7: 567–578.
- 57Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Modelling approach in cell/material interactions studies. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 1187–1199.
- 58Chen X, Nouri A, Li Y, Lin J, Hodgson PD, Wen C. Effect of surface roughness of Ti, Zr and TiZr on apatite precipitation from simulated body fluid. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008; 101: 378–387.
- 59Eanes ED, Gillessen IH, Posner AS. Intermediate states in the precipitation of hydroxyapatite. Nature 1965; 208: 365–367.
- 60Zyman ZZ, Rokhmistrov DV, Glushko VI. Structural and compositional features of amorphous calcium phosphate at the early stage of precipitation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 123–130.
- 61Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials2006; 27: 2907–2915.
- 62Bohner M, Lemaitre J. Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution? Biomaterials2009; 30: 2175–2179.