Retracted: Bone healing in critical-size defects treated with new bioactive glass/calcium sulfate: A histologic and histometric study in rat calvaria
Retraction(s) for this article
-
Retraction: Bone healing in critical-size defects treated with new bioactive glass/calcium sulfate: A histologic and histometric study in rat calvaria
- Volume 112Issue 6Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- First Published online: May 22, 2024
Corresponding Author
Maria J. H. Nagata
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University - UNESP, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorFlávia A. C. Furlaneto
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAntonio J. Moretti
Department of Periodontology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorJerry E. Bouquot
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center Dental Branch, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorChul W. Ahn
Department of Clinical Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorMichel R. Messora
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorStephen E. Fucini
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Private Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
Search for more papers by this authorValdir G. Garcia
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAlvaro F. Bosco
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Maria J. H. Nagata
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University - UNESP, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorFlávia A. C. Furlaneto
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAntonio J. Moretti
Department of Periodontology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorJerry E. Bouquot
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center Dental Branch, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorChul W. Ahn
Department of Clinical Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorMichel R. Messora
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorStephen E. Fucini
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Private Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
Search for more papers by this authorValdir G. Garcia
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAlvaro F. Bosco
Division of Periodontics, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This study analyzed histologically the influence of new spherical bioactive glass (NBG) particles with or without a calcium sulfate (CS) barrier on bone healing in surgically created critical-size defects (CSD) in rat calvaria. A CSD was made in each calvarium of 60 rats, which were divided into three groups: C (control): the defect was filled with blood clot only; NBG: the defect was filled with NBG only; and NBG/CS: the defect was filled with NBG covered by CS barrier. Subgroups were euthanized at 4 or 12 weeks. Amounts of new bone and remnants of implanted materials were calculated as percentages of total area of the original defect. Data were statistically analyzed. In contrast to Group C, thickness throughout defects in Groups NBG and NBG/CS was similar to the original calvarium. At 4 weeks, Group C had significantly more bone formation than Group NBG/CS. No significant differences were found between Group NBG and either Group C or Group NBG/CS. At 12 weeks, Group C had significantly more bone formation than Group NBG or NBG/CS. NBG particles, used with or without a CS barrier, maintained volume and contour of area grafted in CSD. Presence of remaining NBG particles might have accounted for smaller amount of new bone in Groups NBG and NBG/CS at 12 weeks post-operative. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010.
References
- 1 Lang NP, Becker W, Karring T. Formação do osso alveolar. In: J Lindhe, editor. Tratado de periodontia clínica e implantologia oral. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1999. pp 665–689.
- 2 Topazian RG, Hammer WB, Boucher LJ, Hulbert SF. Use of alloplastics for ridge augmentation. J Oral Surg 1971; 29: 792–798.
- 3 Norton MR, Wilson J. Dental implants placed in extraction sites implanted with bioactive glass: Human histology and clinical outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 249–257.
- 4 Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1971; 2: 117–141.
- 5 Hench LL, Paschall HA. Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle. J Biomed Mater Res 1973; 7: 25–42.
- 6 Schepers E, De Clercq M, Ducheyne P, Kempeneers R. Bioactive glass particulate material as a filler for bone lesions. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18: 439–452.
- 7 Furusawa T, Mizunuma K, Yamashita S, Takahashi T. Investigation of early bone formation using resorbable bioactive glass in the rat mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 672–676.
- 8 Froum S, Cho S, Rosenberg E, Rohrer M, Tarnow D. Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bioactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: A pilot study. J Periodontol 2002; 73: 94–102.
- 9 Schepers EJ, Ducheyne P. Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range for the treatment of oral bone defects: A 1-24 month experiment with several materials and particle sizes and size ranges. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 171–181.
- 10 Cordioli G, Mazzocco C, Schepers E, Brugnolo E, Majzoub Z. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 270–278.
- 11 Fang H, Neidt TM. Development of pre-reacted Biogran®. Final technical report. Palm Beach Gardens, Florida: 3i Implant Innovations Inc; 2000.
- 12 Ostomel TA, Qihui S, Chia-Kuang T, Liang H, Stucky GD. Spherical bioactive glass with enhanced rates of hydroxyapatite deposition and hemostatic activity. Small 2006; 2: 1261–1265.
- 13 Veis AA, Dabarakis NN, Parisis NA, Tsirlis AT, Karanikola TG, Printza DV. Bone regeneration around implants using spherical and granular forms of bioactive glass particles. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 386–394.
- 14 Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M, Jancovic S, Orsini M. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 581–586.
- 15 Sottosanti JS, Anson D. Using calcium sulfate as a graft enhancer and membrane barrier. Dent Implantol Update 2003; 14: 1–8.
- 16 Melo LGN, Nagata MJH, Bosco AF, Ribeiro LLG, Leite CM. Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials. A histological and histometric study in rat tibias. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 683–691.
- 17 Furlaneto FAC, Nagata MJH, Fucini SE, Deliberador TM, Okamoto T, Messora MR. Bone healing in critical-size defects treated with bioactive glass/calcium sulfate. A histologic and histometric study in rat calvaria. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 311–318.
- 18 Messora MR, Nagata MJH, Mariano RC, Dornelles RCM, Bomfim SRM, Fucini SE, Garcia VG, Bosco AF. Bone healing in critical-size defects treated with platelet-rich plasma. A histologic and histometric study in rat calvaria. J Periodont Res 2008; 43: 217–223.
- 19 Wikesjö UME, Selvig KA. Periodontal wound healing and regeneration. Periodontol 2000 1999; 19: 21–39.
- 20 Sculean A, Barbé G, Chiantella GC, Arweiler NB, Berakdar M, Brecx M. Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. J Periodontol 2002; 73: 401– 408.
- 21
Wheeler DL,
Stokes KE,
Park HM,
Hollinger JO.
Evaluation of particulate Bioglass® in a rabbit radius ostectomy model.
J Biomed Mater Res
1997;
35:
249–254.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199705)35:2<249::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-C CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 22 Huygh A, Schepers EJG, Barbier L. Microchemical transformation of bioactive glass particles of narrow size range, a 0-24 months study. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002; 13: 315–320.
- 23 Tadjoedin ES, De Lange GL, Lyaruu DM, Kuiper L, Burger EH. High concentrations of bioactive glass material (BioGran) vs. autogenous bone for sinus floor elevation: Histomorphometrical observations on three split mouth clinical cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 428–436.
- 24 Tadjoedin ES, De Lange GL, Holzmann PJ, Kuiper L, Burger EH. Histological observations on biopsies harvested following sinus floor elevation using a bioactive glass material of narrow size range. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 334–344.
- 25 Cancian DCJ, Hochuli-Vieira E, Marcantonio RAC, Marcantonio Júnior E. Use of biogran and calcitite in bone defects: Histologic study in monkeys (Cebus apella). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 859–864.
- 26 Stavropoulos A, Kostopoulos L, Nyengaard JR, Karring T. Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) and bioactive glass (Biogran®) arrest bone formation when used as an adjunct to guided tissue regeneration (GTR): An experimental study in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 636–643.
- 27 Schepers E, Barbier L, Ducheyne P. Implant placement enhanced by bioactive glass particles of narrow size range. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 655–665.
- 28 Prolo DJ, Pedrotti DW, Burres KP, Oklund S. Superior osteogenesis in transplanted allogeneic canine skull following chemical sterilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982; 168: 230–242.
- 29 MacNeill SR, Cobb CM, Rapley JW, Glaros AG, Spencer P. In vivo comparison of synthetic osseous graft materials: A preliminary study. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 239–245.
- 30 Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL, Gunsolley JC. The efficacy of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 227–265.
- 31
Adler CP.
Bone diseases.
Berlin:
Springer-Verlag;
2000. pp
8–
11,
116–121.
10.1007/978-3-662-04088-1 Google Scholar
