The nature and dissemination of UHMWPE wear debris retrieved from periprosthetic tissue of THR
Corresponding Author
Alistair P. D. Elfick
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorSarah M. Green
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSteve Krikler
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwick NHS Trust, Stoney Stanton Road, Coventry, CV1 4FH, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorAnthony Unsworth
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Alistair P. D. Elfick
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorSarah M. Green
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSteve Krikler
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwick NHS Trust, Stoney Stanton Road, Coventry, CV1 4FH, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorAnthony Unsworth
Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The role of wear debris in provoking joint replacement failure through bone resorption is now supported by much research. This study presents the analysis of 104 tissue samples using laser diffraction wear particle analysis in conjunction with standard histologic methods. The number and volume distributions were correlated to a range of joint and patient parameters. The median particle diameter by number was 0.69 μm. No particles smaller than 0.113 μm were resolved. No variation in terms of particle distribution was found among joint types. The ability of particles to migrate away from their point of origin was found to be inversely proportional to their size. The numbers of particles per gram of tissue found in various regions around the prosthesis varied little. Further, the numbers of particles in tissue samples shown to have a chronic foreign-body reaction was > 1 × 109 particles/gram. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 65A: 95–108, 2003
References
- 1 Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Macrophage/particle interaction: Effect of size, composition and surface Area. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28: 81–90.
- 2 Green TR, Fisher J, Stone M, Wroblewski BM, Ingham E. Polyethylene particles of a critical size are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2297–2302.
- 3 Willert H-G, Bertram H, Buchorn GH. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip: The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1990; 258: 95–107.
- 4 McGee MA, Howie DW, Neale SD, Haynes DR, Pearcy MJ. The role of polyethylene wear in joint replacement failure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H 1997; 211: 65–72.
- 5 Hall RM, Unsworth A, Hardaker C, Siney P, Wroblewski BM, Craig PS. Measurement of wear in retrieved acetabular sockets. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H 1995; 209: 233–242.
- 6 Kabo JM, Gebhard JS, Loren G, Amstutz HC. In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75B: 254–258.
- 7 Hall RM, Unsworth A, Wroblewski BM, Siney P. Wear in retrieved Charnley acetabular sockets. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H 1996; 210: 197–207.
- 8 Elfick AP, Hall RM, Pinder IM, Unsworth A. Wear in retrieved acetabular components—Effect of femoral head radius and patient parameters. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 291–295.
- 9 Charnley J, Halley DK. Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1975; 112: 170–179.
- 10 Wallbridge NC, Dowson D. The walking activity of patients with artificial joints. Eng Med 1982; 11: 95–96.
- 11 Dowson D, Wallbridge NC. Laboratory wear tests and clinical observations of the penetration of femoral heads into acetabular cups in total hip joints. I. Charnley prostheses with polytetrafluoroethylene acetabular cups. Wear 1985; 104: 203–215.
- 12 Campbell P, Ma S, Yeom B, McKellop H, Schmalzried TP, Amstutz HC. Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 127–131.
- 13 Elfick APD, Green SM, Pinder IM, Unsworth A. A novel technique for the detailed size characterisation of wear debris. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2000; 11: 267–271.
- 14 Elfick APD, Smith SL, Green SM, Unsworth A. The quantitative assessment of UHMWPE wear debris produced in hip simulator testing: The influence of head material and roughness, motion and loading. Wear 2001; 249: 517–527.
- 15 Mie G. Considerations on the optics of turbid media, especially colloid metal sols. Ann der Physik 1908; 25: 377–442.
- 16 Elfick APD, Green SM, Unsworth A. Laser diffraction as a tool for the accurate prediction of debris load in periprosthetic tissue. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2001; 26: 1032.
- 17 Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 1965; 52: 591–611.
- 18 Cuzik J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Medicine 1985; 4: 87–90.
- 19 Kendall MG, Gibbons JD. Rank correlation methods. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
- 20 Campbell P. Personal communication; 2001.
- 21 Campbell P, Doorn P, Dorey F, Amstutz HC. Wear and morphology of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles from total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H 1996; 210: 167–174.
- 22
Hirakawa K,
Bauer TW,
Stulberg BN,
Wilde AH.
Comparison and quantification of wear debris of failed total hip and knee arthroplasty.
J Biomed Mater Res
1996;
31:
257–263.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199606)31:2<257::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-I CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 23 Kobayashi A, Bonfield W, Kadoya Y, Yamac T, Freeman MAR, Scott G, Revell PA. The size and shape of particulate polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H 1997; 211: 11–15.
- 24 Lee J-M, Salvati EA, Betts F, DiCarlo EF, Doty SB, Bullough PG. Size of metallic and polyethylene debris particles in failed cemented total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74B: 380–384.
- 25
Maloney WJ,
Smith L,
Schmalzried TP,
Chiba J,
Huene D,
Rubash H.
Isolation and characterisation of wear particles generated in patients who have had failure of a hip arthroplasty without cement.
J Bone Joint Surg
1995;
77A:
1301–1310.
10.2106/00004623-199509000-00002 Google Scholar
- 26 Margevicius KJ, Bauer TW, McMahon JT, Brown SA, Merritt K. Isolation and characterisation of debris in membranes around total joint prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76A: 1664–1675.
- 27 McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park S-H, Schmalzried TP, Grigoris P, Amstutz HC, Sarmiento A. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1995; 311: 3–20.
- 28 Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Glant TT, Gilbert JL, Black J, Galante JO. Composition and morphology of wear debris in failed uncemented total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76B: 60–67.
- 29 Tipper JL, Ingham E, Hailey JL, Besong AA, Fisher J, Wroblewski BM, Stone M. Quantitative analysis of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieved Charnley hip prostheses. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2000; 11: 117–124.
- 30 Yamac T, Kobayashi A, Bonfield W, Kadoya Y, Freeman MAR, Scott G, Revell PA. Extraction and characterization of metallic wear particles in total joint replacements. Fifth World Biomater Cong, Toronto, Canada; 1996.
- 31 Biggs SA, Bragdon CR, Muratoglu OK, Caruso PJ, Harris WH. Qualitative analysis of polyethylene particles extracted from bovine serum used in a hip simulator. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1998; 23: 73.
- 32 Yamamoto K, Clarke IC, Masaoka T, Oonishi H, Williams PA, Good VD, Imakiire A. Microwear phenomena of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene cups and debris morphology related to gamma-radiation dose in simulator study. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 56: 65–73.
- 33 Premnath V, Harris WH, Jasty M, Merrill EW. Gamma sterilisation of UHMWPE articular implants: An analysis of the oxidation problem. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1741–1753.
- 34 Besong AA, Tipper JL, Ingham E, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Fisher J. Quantitative comparison of wear debris from UHMWPE that has and has not been sterilised by gamma irradiation. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80B: 340–344.
- 35 Howling GI, Barnett PI, Tipper JL, Stone MH, Fisher J, Ingham E. Quantitative characterization of polyethylene isolated from periprosthetic tissue in early failure knee implants and early and late failure Charnley hip implants. J Biomed Mater Res, Appl Biomater 2001; 58: 415–420.
- 36 Green TR, Fisher J, Matthew JB, Stone MH, Ingham E. Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 490–497.
- 37 Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness, and materials on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68A: 1041–1051.
- 38 Maxian TA, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ. 3-Dimemsional sliding/contact computational simulation of total hip wear. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1996; 333: 41–50.
- 39 Hall RM, Siney P, Unsworth A, Wroblewski BM. The association between rates of wear in retrieved acetabular components and the radius of the femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H 1998; 212: 321–326.
- 40 Lewis CE, McGee JO. The macrophage. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
- 41
Noble J,
Jones AG,
Davies MA,
Sledge CB,
Kramer RL,
Livni E.
Leakage of radioactive particle systems from a synovial joint studied with a gamma camera. Its approach to radiation synovectomy.
J Bone Joint Surg
1983;
65A:
381–389.
10.2106/00004623-198365030-00014 Google Scholar
- 42 Mabrey JD, Afsar-Keshmiri A, McClung GA, Pember MA, Wooldridge TM, Agrawal CM. Comparison of UHMWPE particles in synovial fluid and tissues from failed THA. J Biomed Mater Res, Appl Biomater 2001; 58: 196–202.
- 43
Schmalzried TP,
Jasty M,
Harris WH.
Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: polyethylene wear debris and the concept of effective joint space.
J Bone Joint Surg
1992;
74A:
849–863.
10.2106/00004623-199274060-00006 Google Scholar
- 44
Iglic A,
Kralj-Iglic V,
Ipavec M,
Smrke D.
A mathematical simulation of contact stress in the hip joint.
J Biomech
1998;
31:
74.
10.1016/S0021-9290(98)80151-6 Google Scholar
- 45 Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, Gavrilovic J, Black J, Peoch M. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82A: 457–477.
- 46 Soh EW, Blunn GW, Wait ME, Walker PS. Size and shape of metal particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1996; 21: 462.
- 47 Scott M, Widding K, Ries M, Shanbhag A. Wear particle analyses of conventional and cross-linked UHMWPE tested in an anatomic hip simulator. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2001; 26: 1.
- 48 Kobayashi A, Freeman MAR, Bonfield W, Kadoya Y, Yamac T, Al-Saffar N, Revell PA. Number of polyethylene particles and osteolysis in total joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79B: 844–848.
- 49 Hirakawa K, Bauer TW, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Secic M. Characterisation and comparison of wear debris from failed total hip implants of different types. J Bone Joint Surg 1996; 78A: 1235–1243.
- 50 Gelb H, Schumacher HR, Cuckler J, Baker DG. In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris: Effect of size, morphology and surface area. J Orthop Res 1994; 12: 83–92.
- 51 Bos I, Fredebold D, Diebold J, Lohrs U. Tissue reactions to cemented hip sockets—Histologic and morphometric autopsy study of 25 acetabula. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66: 1–8.