Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces
Corresponding Author
J. Carson Meredith
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8540
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100Search for more papers by this authorJoe-L. Sormana
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100
Search for more papers by this authorBenjamin G. Keselowsky
Georgia Tech/Emory Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0360
Search for more papers by this authorAndrés J. García
Georgia Tech/Emory Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0360
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 801 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405
Search for more papers by this authorAlessandro Tona
Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8310
Search for more papers by this authorAlamgir Karim
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8540
Search for more papers by this authorEric J. Amis
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8540
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
J. Carson Meredith
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8540
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100Search for more papers by this authorJoe-L. Sormana
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100
Search for more papers by this authorBenjamin G. Keselowsky
Georgia Tech/Emory Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0360
Search for more papers by this authorAndrés J. García
Georgia Tech/Emory Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0360
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 801 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405
Search for more papers by this authorAlessandro Tona
Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8310
Search for more papers by this authorAlamgir Karim
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8540
Search for more papers by this authorEric J. Amis
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8540
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
We report a novel combinatorial methodology for characterizing the effects of polymer surface features on cell function. Libraries containing hundreds to thousands of distinct chemistries, microstructures, and roughnesses are prepared using composition spread and temperature gradient techniques. The method enables orders of magnitude increases in discovery rate, decreases variance, and allows for the first time high-throughput assays of cell response to physical and chemical surface features. The technique overcomes complex variable spaces that limit development of biomaterial surfaces for control of cell function. This report demonstrates these advantages by investigating the sensitivity of osteoblasts to the chemistry, microstructure, and roughness of poly(D,L-lactide) and poly(ϵ-caprolactone) blends. In particular, we use the phenomenon of heat-induced phase separation in these polymer mixtures to generate libraries with diverse surface features, followed by culture of UMR-106 and MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts on the libraries. Surface features produced at a specific composition and process temperature range were discovered to enhance dramatically alkaline phosphatase expression in both cell lines, not previously observed for osteoblasts on polymer blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 66A: 483–490, 2003
References
- 1 Calvert JW, Marra KG, Cook L, Kumta PN, DiMilla PA, Weiss LE. Characterization of osteoblast-like behavior of clutured bone marrow stromal cells on various polymer surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 52: 279–284.
- 2 Huang S, Ingber DE. Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: Switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. Exp Cell Res 2000; 261: 91–103.
- 3 Ranucci CS, Moghe PV. Polymer substrate topography actively regulates the multicellular organization and liver-specific functions of cultured hepatocytes. Tissue Eng 1999; 5: 407–420.
- 4
Schwartz Z,
Martin JY,
Dean DD,
Simpson J,
Cochran DK,
Boyan BD.
Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix reporduction, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation.
J Biomed Mater Red
1996;
30:
145.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<145::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-R CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 5 Wojciak-Stothard B, Madeeja B, Korohoda W, Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Activation of macrophage-like cells by multiple grooved substrata. Topographical controll of cell behaviour. Cell Biol Int 1995; 19: 485.
- 6 Von Recum AF, Shannon CE, Cannon CE, Long KJ, Can Kooten TG, Meyle J. Surface roughness, porosity, and texture as modifiers of cellular adhesion. Tissue Eng 1996; 2: 241.
- 7 Meyle J, Wolfburg H, Von Recum AF. Surface micromorphology and cellular interactions. J Biomater Appl 1993; 7: 362.
- 8
Lampin M,
Warocquier-Clerout R,
Legris C,
Degrange M,
Sigot-Luizard MF.
Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration.
J Biomed Mater Red
1997;
36:
99.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<99::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-E CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 9
Boyan BD,
Batzer R,
Kieswetter K,
Liu Y,
Cochran DL,
Szmuckler-Moncler S,
Dean DD,
Schwartz Z.
Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3.
J Biomed Mater Res
1998;
39:
77–85.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199801)39:1<77::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-L CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 10 Wieland M, Chehroudi B, Textor M, Brunette DM. Use of Ti-coated replicas to investigate the effects on fibroblast shape of surfaces with varying roughnes and constant chemical composition. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 60: 434–444.
- 11 Glass-Brudzinski J, Perizzolo D, Brunette DM. Effects of substratum surface topography on the organization of cells and collagen fibers in collagen gel cultures. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 61: 608–618.
- 12 Dike LE, Chen CS, Mrksich M, Tien J, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1999; 35: 441–448.
- 13 Folkman J, Moscona A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978; 273: 345–349.
- 14 Huang S, Chen SC, Ingber DE. Cell-shape-dependent control of p27Kip and cell cycle progression in human capillary endothelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 1998; 9: 3179–3193.
- 15 Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997; 276: 1425–1428.
- 16 Thomas CH, Collier JH, Sfeir CS, Healy KE. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 1972–1977.
- 17 Chicurel M. Faster, better, cheaper genotyping. Nature 2001; 412: 580–582.
- 18
Brocchini S,
James K,
Tangpasuthadol V,
Kohn J.
Structure–property correlations in a combinatorial library of degradable biomaterials.
J Biomed Mater Res
1998;
42:
66–75.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199810)42:1<66::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-M CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 19 Meredith JC, Smith AP, Karim A, Amis EJ. Combinatorial materials science: Thin-film dewetting. Macromolecules 2000; 33: 9747–9756.
- 20
Meredith JC,
Amis EJ.
LCST phase separation in biodegradable polymer blends: poly(D,L-lactide) and poly(ϵ-caprolactone).
Macromol Chem Phys
2000;
200:
733–739.
10.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(20000301)201:6<733::AID-MACP733>3.0.CO;2-5 Google Scholar
- 21 According to ISO 31-8, the term “molecular weight” has been replaced by “relative molecular mass,” Mr. The number average molecular mass is given by Mn.
- 22 Certain equipment and instruments or materials are identified in the article to adequately specify the experimental details. Such identification does not imply recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply the materials are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
- 23 Meredith JC, Karim A, Amis EJ. High-throughput measurement of polymer blend phase behavior. Macromolecules 2000; 33: 5760–5762.
- 24 Gruber R, Nothehegger G, Ho GM, Willhelm M, Peterlik M. Differential stimulation by PGE2 and calcemic hormones of IL-6 in stromal/osteoblastic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 270: 1080–1085.
- 25 van Leeuwen JPTM, Birkenhager JC, van den Bemd GCM, Pols HAP. Evidence for coordinated regulation of osteoblast function by 1,25-duhydroxyvitamin D3 and parathyroid hormone. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996; 1312: 55–62.
- 26 Partridge NC, Alcorn D, Michelangeli VP, Kemp BE, Ryan GB, J. MT. Functional properties of hormonally responsive cultured normal and malignant rat osteoblastic cells. Endocrinology 1981; 108: 213–219.
- 27 Sodek J, Berkman FA. Bone Cell Cultures. Methods Enzymol 1987; 145: 303–324.
- 28 McGee-Russel SM. Histochemical methods for calcium. J Histochem Cytochem 1958; 6: 22–42.
- 29 Tams J, Joziasse CAP, Bos RRM, Rozema FR, Drijpma DW, Pennings AJ. High-impact poly(L/D-lactide) for grafture fixation: In vitro degradation and animal pilot study. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 1409–1416.
- 30
Batzer R,
Liu Y,
Cochran DL,
Szmuckler-Moncler S,
Dean DD,
Boyan BD,
Schwartz Z.
Prostaglandins mediate the effects of titanium surface roughness on MG63 osteoblast-like cells and alter cell responsiveness to 1alpha,25-(OH)2D3.
J Biomed Mater Res
1998;
32:
489–496.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<489::AID-JBM20>3.0.CO;2-C Google Scholar
- 31 Singhvi R, Kumar A, Lopez GP, Stephanopoulos GN, Wang DI, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Engineering cell shape and function. Science 1994; 264: 696–698.
- 32 Groessner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci 1992; 1: 209–217.
- 33 Chicurel ME, Singer RH, Meyer CJ, OIngber DE. Integrin binding and mechanical tension induce movement of mRNA and ribosomes to focal adhesions. Nature 1998; 392: 730–733.
- 34 The contact angle of deionized water was measured to be 59° for pure PDLA and 63° for PCL.
- 35 Park A, Griffith Cima L. In vitro cell response to differences in poly-L-lactide crystallinity. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 31: 117–130.
- 36 García AJ, Vega MD, Boettiger D. Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate-dependent changes in fibronectin conformation. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10: 785–798.