Volume 95, Issue 8 pp. 1764-1773
BRIEF REPORT

Brief report: Revealing the nuance: Examining approaches for research with adolescents who identify with multiple racial/ethnic groups

Julia Moon

Julia Moon

Psychology Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Betsy Centeno

Betsy Centeno

Psychology Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
José A. De León

José A. De León

Richmond High School, Richmond, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Zena R. Mello

Corresponding Author

Zena R. Mello

Psychology Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence Zena R. Mello, Psychology Department, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 September 2023

Abstract

Introduction

Increasing racial/ethnic diversity in the United States calls for methodological approaches that capture participants who identify with multiple racial/ethnic groups. Existing approaches are oriented toward large samples (N > 500); yet, we do not know how effective these approaches are with more common smaller convenience samples. We explored how several approaches were associated with the sample distribution of racial/ethnic groups and ethnic identity using a small convenience sample.

Methods

In 2017, 320 U.S. adolescents (Mage = 16.04 years, SDage = 1.33; 59% female) responded to an open-ended question regarding their racial/ethnic group(s) in a cross-sectional survey. Seventy-five (23%) adolescents identified with multiple racial/ethnic groups. Remaining adolescents identified solely with the Asian/Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander (19%), Black/African American (3%), European American (21%), Latinx (34%), or Native American/Alaska Native (<1%) group.

Results

Three approaches for adolescents with multiple racial/ethnic groups were employed. Findings indicated that the sample distributions differed across the approaches. The greatest differences were shown for Black/African American, Native American/Alaska Native, and Other Race/Ethnicity groups. Descriptively, ethnic identity also differed across the approaches. For example, multiracial/ethnic adolescents reported greater ethnic identity-exploration than their European American counterparts in one approach than in others.

Conclusions

Researchers should carefully consider approaches to research with adolescents who identify with multiple racial/ethnic groups given implications for the literature. This study demonstrates the critical need to further develop approaches for capturing the complexity of race/ethnicity.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data and materials for the study are available by emailing the corresponding author.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.