Free Access
Detection of Differences in Fertility
RUPERT P. AMANN,
ROY H. HAMMERSTEDT,
Corresponding Author
RUPERT P. AMANN
BioPore Inc, State College, Pennsylvania.
819 Marble Dr, Ft Collins, CO 80526 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Search for more papers by this authorRUPERT P. AMANN,
ROY H. HAMMERSTEDT,
Corresponding Author
RUPERT P. AMANN
BioPore Inc, State College, Pennsylvania.
819 Marble Dr, Ft Collins, CO 80526 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Search for more papers by this author
References
- Amann RP. Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately J Androl 1989; 10: 89–98.
- Amann RP. Correlation or diagnosis and prediction. Proc 14th Int Congr Anim Reprod 2000; 2: 69.
- Amann RP, Gill SPS, Hammerstedt RH. Maximizing Genetic Impact of Roosters. State College, Pa: BioPore Inc; 1997: 15.1–15.9.
- Amann RP, Hammerstedt RH. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality: an opinion. J Androl 1993; 14: 397–406.
- Amann RP, Seidel GE Jr, Brink ZA. Exposure of thawed bull sperm to a synthetic peptide before artificial insemination increases fertility. J Androl 1999; 20: 42–46.
- Beatty RA. Fertility of mixed semen from different rabbits. J Reprod Fertil 1960; 1: 52–60.
- Blazak WF, Overstreet JW, Katz DF, Hanson FW. A competitive in vitro assay of human sperm fertilizing ability utilizing contrasting fluorescent sperm markers. J Androl 1981; 3: 165–171.
- Braundmeier AG, Miller DJ. The search is on: finding accurate molecular markers of male fertility. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 1915–1925.
- Chaudhuri D., Wishart GJ, Lake PE, Ravie O. Predicting the fertilizing capacity of avian semen: comparison of a simple colorimetric test with other methods for predicting the fertilizing ability of fowl semen. Br Poult Sci 1988; 29: 847–851.
- den Daas JHG. Laboratory assessment of semen characteristics. Anim Reprod Sci 1992; 28: 87–94.
- den Daas JHG. Prediction of Bovine Male Fertility [ doctoral thesis]. Wageningen: University of Wageningen; 1998.
- den Daas JHG, De Jong G., Lansbergen LMTE, van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw AM. The relationship between the number of spermatozoa inseminated and the reproductive efficiency of individual dairy bulls. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 1714–1723.
- Dziuk P. Who will the father be Perspect Biol Med 1998; 41: 439–445.
- Fearon JM, Wegener PT. Relationship between fertility in cattle and the number of inseminated spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 2000; 119: 293–308.
- Foote RH, Oltenacu EBA. Increasing fertility in artificial insemination by culling bulls or ejaculates within bulls. In: Proceedings of the 8th Technical Conference on AI. Columbia, Mo: National Association of Animal Breeders; 1980: 6–12.
- Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P., et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1388–1393.
- Magargee SF, Cramer PG, Hammerstedt RH. Increased in vitro binding and fertilizing ability of mouse sperm exposed to a synthetic peptide. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 57: 406–411.
- McCulloh DH. QA techniques for the IVF program. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Regional Workshop. St. Louis, Mo: American Association of Bioanalysts; 1996: 3.1–3.21.
- McNeil BJ, Keller E., Adelstein SJ. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 211–215.
- Muller CH. Rationale, interpretation, validation, and uses of sperm function tests. J Androl 2000; 21: 10–30.
- Pace M., Sullivan JJ, Elliott FI, Graham EF, Coulter GH. Effects of thawing temperature, number of spermatozoa and spermatozoal quality on fertility of bovine spermatozoa packaged in 0.5-ml French straws. J Anim Sci 1981; 53: 693–701.
- Robl JM, Dziuk PJ. Influence of the concentration of sperm on the percentage of eggs fertilized for three strains of mice. Gamete Res 1984; 10: 415–422.
- Saacke RG, Dalton JC, Nadir S., Nebel REL, Bame JH. Relationship of seminal traits and insemination time to fertilization rate and embryo quality. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 60/61: 663–677.
- Saacke RG, Marshall CE, Vinsion WE, et al. Semen quality and heter-ospermic insemination in cattle. Proc 9th Int Congr Anim Reprod 1982; 5: 75–78.
- Saacke RG, Nadir S., Nebel RL. Relationship of semen quality to sperm transport, fertilization, and embryo quality in ruminants. Theriogenology 1994; 41: 45–50.
- Saeki K., Nagao Y., Hoshi M., Nagai M. Effects of heparin, sperm concentration and bull variation on in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes in a protein-free medium. Theriogenology 1995; 43: 751–759.
- Sexton TJ. A new poultry semen extender. 1. Effect of extension on the fertility of chicken semen. Poult Sci 1977; 56: 1443–1446.
- Taneja GC, Gowe RS. The effect of dosage of undiluted semen on fertility in two breeds of fowl. Br Poult Sci 1961; 2: 81–89.
- Weigel KA. Towards national fertility evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 18th Technical Conference on AI. Columbia, Mo: National Association of Animal Breeders; 2000: 50–54.
- Wishart GJ. Quantitation of the fertilizing ability of fresh compared with frozen and thawed fowl spermatozoa. Br Poult Sci 1985; 26: 375–380.
- Wishart GJ, Palmer FH. Correlation of the fertilizing ability of semen from individual male fowls with sperm motility and ATP content. Br Poult Sci 1986; 27: 97–102.
-
Wishart GJ,
Staines HJ.
Measuring sperm:egg interaction to access breeding efficiency in chickens and turkeys.
Poult Sci
1999; 87: 428–436.
10.1093/ps/78.3.428 Google Scholar
- Zaneveld LJD, Jeyendran RS. Sperm function tests. Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am 1992; 3: 353–371.
