Volume 124, Issue 12 pp. 2864-2871
Cancer Genetics

Construction of oncogenetic tree models reveals multiple pathways of oral cancer progression

Swapnali Pathare

Swapnali Pathare

Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Cancer Research Institute (CRI), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Alejandro A. Schäffer

Alejandro A. Schäffer

Computational Biology Branch, National Center for Biotechnology Information, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD

Search for more papers by this author
Niko Beerenwinkel

Niko Beerenwinkel

Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Manoj Mahimkar

Corresponding Author

Manoj Mahimkar

Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Cancer Research Institute (CRI), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India

Fax: +91-22-27405085.

Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Cancer Research Institute (CRI), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai-410210, IndiaSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 13 January 2009
Citations: 21

Abstract

Oral cancer develops and progresses by accumulation of genetic alterations. The interrelationship between these alterations and their sequence of occurrence in oral cancers has not been thoroughly understood. In the present study, we applied oncogenetic tree models to comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data of 97 primary oral cancers to identify pathways of progression. CGH revealed the most frequent gains on chromosomes 8q (72.4%) and 9q (41.2%) and frequent losses on 3p (49.5%) and 8p (47.5%). Both mixture and distance-based tree models suggested multiple progression pathways and identified +8q as an early event. The mixture model suggested two independent pathways namely a major pathway with −8p and a less frequent pathway with +9q. The distance-based tree identified three progression pathways, one characterized by −8p, another by −3p and the third by alterations +11q and +7p. Differences were observed in cytogenetic pathways of node-positive and node-negative oral cancers. Node-positive cancers were characterized by more non-random aberrations (n = 11) and progressed via −8p or −3p. On the other hand, node-negative cancers involved fewer non-random alterations (n = 6) and progressed along −3p. In summary, the tree models for oral cancers provided novel information about the interactions between genetic alterations and predicted their probable order of occurrence. © 2009 UICC

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.