How old is streamwater? Open questions in catchment transit time conceptualization, modelling and analysis
Corresponding Author
J. J. McDonnell
Institute for Water and Watersheds and Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5706, USA
School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB24 3UF UK
Institute for Water and Watersheds and Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5706, USA; School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB24 3UF UK.===Search for more papers by this authorK. McGuire
Virginia Water Resources Research Center & Department of Forestry Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Search for more papers by this authorP. Aggarwal
Isotope Hydrology Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorK. J. Beven
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ UK
Search for more papers by this authorD. Biondi
Dipartimento di Difesa del Suolo, Università della Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
Search for more papers by this authorG. Destouni
Department of Physical Geography & Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, SE 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorS. Dunn
Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK
Search for more papers by this authorA. James
Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University, Campus Box 8008, Raleigh, NC 27695-8080, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Kirchner
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Raemistrasse 101, CH-8092, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorP. Kraft
Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorS. Lyon
Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Villavägen 16, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorP. Maloszewski
HMGU Munich—Institute of Groundwater Ecology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorB. Newman
Department of Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies, Centre de Recherche Public-Gabriel Lippmann, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorL. Pfister
Isotope Hydrology Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorA. Rinaldo
Dept of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Universita' di Padova, Padova I-35131, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorA. Rodhe
Division of Hydrology, Uppsala University, Box 256, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorT. Sayama
DPRI, Kyoto University, Gokasho Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Seibert
Hydrology and Climate, Physical Geography Division, Department of Geography University of Zurich—Irchel, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorK. Solomon
Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Search for more papers by this authorC. Soulsby
University of Edinburgh, Old College South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
Search for more papers by this authorM. Stewart
Aquifer Dynamics & GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorD. Tetzlaff
School of Geosciences, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Aberdeen, Elphinstone Road Aberdeen, AB24 3UF Scotland, UK
Search for more papers by this authorC. Tobin
Ecole Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, EPFL ENAC ISTE EFLUM GR A0 402, Station 2, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorP. Troch
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Search for more papers by this authorM. Weiler
Institute of Hydrology, University of Freiburg, Fahnenbergplatz, 79098 Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorA. Western
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorA. Wörman
Division of Water Resources Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 76, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorS. Wrede
The Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Water Resources Section, P.O. Box 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
J. J. McDonnell
Institute for Water and Watersheds and Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5706, USA
School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB24 3UF UK
Institute for Water and Watersheds and Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5706, USA; School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB24 3UF UK.===Search for more papers by this authorK. McGuire
Virginia Water Resources Research Center & Department of Forestry Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Search for more papers by this authorP. Aggarwal
Isotope Hydrology Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorK. J. Beven
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ UK
Search for more papers by this authorD. Biondi
Dipartimento di Difesa del Suolo, Università della Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
Search for more papers by this authorG. Destouni
Department of Physical Geography & Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, SE 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorS. Dunn
Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK
Search for more papers by this authorA. James
Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University, Campus Box 8008, Raleigh, NC 27695-8080, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Kirchner
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Raemistrasse 101, CH-8092, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorP. Kraft
Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorS. Lyon
Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Villavägen 16, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorP. Maloszewski
HMGU Munich—Institute of Groundwater Ecology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorB. Newman
Department of Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies, Centre de Recherche Public-Gabriel Lippmann, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorL. Pfister
Isotope Hydrology Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorA. Rinaldo
Dept of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Universita' di Padova, Padova I-35131, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorA. Rodhe
Division of Hydrology, Uppsala University, Box 256, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorT. Sayama
DPRI, Kyoto University, Gokasho Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Seibert
Hydrology and Climate, Physical Geography Division, Department of Geography University of Zurich—Irchel, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorK. Solomon
Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Search for more papers by this authorC. Soulsby
University of Edinburgh, Old College South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
Search for more papers by this authorM. Stewart
Aquifer Dynamics & GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorD. Tetzlaff
School of Geosciences, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Aberdeen, Elphinstone Road Aberdeen, AB24 3UF Scotland, UK
Search for more papers by this authorC. Tobin
Ecole Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, EPFL ENAC ISTE EFLUM GR A0 402, Station 2, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorP. Troch
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Search for more papers by this authorM. Weiler
Institute of Hydrology, University of Freiburg, Fahnenbergplatz, 79098 Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorA. Western
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorA. Wörman
Division of Water Resources Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 76, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorS. Wrede
The Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Water Resources Section, P.O. Box 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this author
References
- Amin IE, Campana ME. 1996. A general lumped parameter model for the interpretation of tracer data and transit time calculation in hydrologic systems. Journal of Hydrology 179: 1–21.
- Bencala KE, Walters RA. 1983. Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool-and-riffle stream: a transient storage model. Water Resources Research 19: 718–724.
- Berman E, Gupta M, Gabrielli C, Garland T, McDonnell JJ. 2009. High-frequency field deployable isotope analyzer for hydrological applications. Water Resources Research 45: 10, DOI: 10.1029/ 2009WR008265.
- Beven K. 2006a. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology 320: 18–36.
- Beven K. 2006b. Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology: Q1 = (S, R, Δt)A as closure. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 10: 609–618.
- Beven KJ. 2009. Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future? An Introduction to Techniques for Uncertainty Estimation in Environmental Prediction. Routledge: London; 310.
- Broxton PD, Troch PA, Lyon SW. 2009. On the role of aspect to quantify water transit times in small mountainous catchments. Water Resources Research 45: W08427, DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007438.
- Buttle J. 2006. Mapping first-order controls on streamflow from drainage basins: the T3 template. Hydrological Processes 20: 3415–3422.
- Cvetkovic V, Dagan G. 1994. Transport of kinetically sorbing solute by steady random velocity in heterogeneous porous formations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 265: 189–215.
- Cvetkovic V, Dagan G, Shapiro AM. 1992. A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations, 2, Uncertainty analysis. Water Resources Research 28: 137–1388.
- Darracq A, Destouni G, Persson K, Prieto C, Jarsjö J. 2009. Quantification of advective solute travel times and mass transport through hydrological catchments. Environmental Fluid Mechanics DOI 10.1007/s10652-009-9147-2 (in press).
- Destouni G, Graham W. 1995. Solute transport through an integrated heterogeneous soil-groundwater system. Water Resources Research 31: 1935–1944.
- Devito K, Creed I, Gan T, Mendoza C, Petrone R, Silins U, Smerdon B. 2005. A framework for broad-scale classification of hydrologic response units on the Boreal Plain: is topography the last thing to consider?. Hydrological Processes 19: 1705–1714.
- Dunn SM, McDonnell JJ, Vache KB. 2007. Factors influencing the residence time of catchment waters: a virtual experiment approach. Water Resources Research 43: W06408. DOI:06410.01029/02006WR 005393.
- Eriksson E. 1958. The possible use of tritium for estimating groundwater storage. Tellus 10: 472–478.
- Etcheverry D, Perrochet P. 2000. Direct simulation of groundwater transit-time distributions using the reservoir theory. Hydrogeology Journal 8: 200–208.
- Feng X, Kirchner JW, Neal C. 2004. Measuring catchment-scale chemical retardation using spectral analysis of reactive and passive chemical tracer time series. Journal of Hydrology 292: 296–307.
- Fiori A, Russo D. 2008. Travel time distribution in a hillslope: insight from numerical simulations. Water Resources Research 44: W12426, DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007135.
- Fiori A, Russo D, Di Lazzaro M. 2009. Stochastic analysis of transport in hillslopes: travel time distribution and source zone dispersion. Water Resources Research 45: W08435, DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007668.
- Foussereau X, Graham W, Aakpoji A, Destouni G, Rao PSC. 2001. Solute transport through a heterogeneous coupled vadose-saturated zone system with temporally random rainfall. Water Resources Research 37: 1577–1588.
- Gelhar LW, Welty C, Rehfeldt KR. 1992. A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resources Research 28: 1955–1974.
- Haggerty R, Wondzell SM, Johnson MA. 2002. Power-law residence time distribution in the hyporheic zone of a 2nd-order mountain stream. Geophysical Research Letters 29: 1640, DOI: 10.1029/2002GL 014743.
- Haitjema HM. 1995. On the residence time distribution in idealized groundwatersheds. Journal of Hydrology 172: 127–146.
- Heidbüchel I, Troch P, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Rasmussen C, Chorover J. 2008. What controls transit time distributions in a mountainous semi-arid catchment? EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 89:Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract H31E-0934.
- Hrachowitz M, Soulsby C, Tetzlaff D, Dawson JJC, Malcolm IA. 2009a. Regionalization of transit time estimates in montane catchments by integrating landscape controls. Water Resources Research 45: W05421, DOI:10.1029/2008WR00749.
- Hrachowitz M, Soulsby C, Tetzlaff D, Dawson JJC, Dunn SM, Malcolm IA. 2009b. Using long-term data sets to understand transit times in contrasting headwater catchments. Journal of Hydrology 367: 237–248.
- Iorgulescu I, Beven KJ, Musy A. 2005. Data-based modelling of runoff and chemical tracer concentrations in the Haute-Mentue research catchment (Switzerland). Hydrological Processes 19: 2557–2573.
- Iorgulescu I, Beven KJ, Musy A. 2007. Flow, mixing, and displacement in using a data-based hydrochemical model to predict conservative tracer data. Water Resources Research 43: W03401. DOI:03410.01029/02005WR004019.
- Jury WA, Stolzy LH, Shouse P. 1982. A field-test of the transfer-function model for predicting solute transport. Water Resources Research 18: 369–375.
- Kirchner JW. 2003. A double paradox in catchment hydrology and geochemistry. Hydrological Processes 17: 871–874.
- Kirchner JW. 2006. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research 42: W03S04. DOI:10.1029/2005WR004362.
- Kirchner JW, Feng X, Neal C. 2000. Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments. Nature 403: 524–527.
- Kirchner JW, Feng X, Neal C. 2001. Catchment-scale advection and dispersion as a mechanism for fractal scaling in stream tracer concentrations. Journal of Hydrology 254: 82–101.
- Kreft A, Zuber A. 1978. On the physical meaning if the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions. Chemical Engineering Science 33: 1471–1480.
- Lindgren GA, Destouni G, Miller AV. 2004. Solute transport through the integrated groundwater-stream system of a catchment. Water Resources Research 40: W03511. DOI:03510.01029/02003WR002765.
- Lindstrom G, Rodhe A. 1992. Transit times of water in soil lysimeters from modeling of oxygen-18. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 65: 83–100.
- Lischeid G. 2008. Combining hydrometric and hydrochemical data sets for investigating runoff generation processes: tautologies, inconsistencies and possible explanations. Geography Compass 2: 255–280.
10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00082.x Google Scholar
- Maloszewski P, Zuber A. 1982. Determining the turnover time of groundwater systems with the aid of environmental tracers. 1. Models and their applicability. Journal of Hydrology 57: 207–231.
- Maloszewski P, Zuber A. 1993. Principles and practice of calibration and validation of mathematical models for the interpretation of environmental tracer data. Advances in Water Resources 16: 173–190.
- Maloszewski P, Moser H, Stichler W, Trimborn P. 1995. Isotope hydrology investigations in large refuse lysimeters. Journal of Hydrology 167: 149–166.
- Maloszewski P, Rauert W, Trimborn P, Herrmann A, Rau R. 1992. Isotope hydrological study of mean transit times in an alpine basin (Wimbachtal, Germany). Journal of Hydrology 140: 343–360.
- Matott LS, Babendreier JE, Purucker ST. 2009. Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: a review of concepts and tools. Water Resources Research 45: W06421, DOI: 10.1029/ 2008WR007301.
- McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ. 2006. A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling. Journal of Hydrology 330: 543–563.
- McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ, Weiler M, Kendall C, Welker JM, McGlynn BL, Seibert J. 2005. The role of topography on catchment-scale water residence time. Water Resources Research 41: W05002. DOI:05010.01029/02004WR003657.
- McGuire KJ, Weiler M, McDonnell JJ. 2007. Integrating tracer experiments with modeling to assess runoff processes and water transit time. Advances in Water Resources 30: 824–837.
- Monteith JL. 1981. Evaporation and surface temperature. Quarterly Journal of Royal Meteorological Society 107: 1–27.
- Niemi AJ. 1977. Residence time distribution of variable flow processes. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 28: 855–860.
- Page T, Beven KJ, Freer J, Neal C. 2007. Modelling the chloride signal at Plynlimon, Wales, using a modified dynamic TOPMODEL incorporating conservative chemical mixing (with uncertainty). Hydrological Processes 21: 292–307.
- Persson K, Destouni G. 2009. Propagation of water pollution uncertainty and risk from the subsurface to the surface water system of a catchment. Journal of Hydrology 377(3–4): 434–444.
- Rinaldo A, Bertuzzo E, Botter G. 2005. Nonpoint source transport models from empiricism to coherent theoretical frameworks. Ecological Modelling 184: 19–35.
- Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 1996. Geomorphological theory of the hydrological response. Hydrological Processes 10: 803–829.
- Rodgers P, Soulsby C, Waldron S, Tetzlaff D. 2005. Using stable isotope tracers to assess hydrological flow paths, residence times and landscape influences in a nested mesoscale catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 9: 139–155.
- Rodhe A, Nyberg L, Bishop K. 1996. Transit times for water in a small till catchment from a step shift in the oxygen 18 content of the water input. Water Resources Research 32: 3497–3511.
- Sayama T, McDonnell JJ. 2009. A new time-space accounting scheme to predict stream water residence time and hydrograph source components at the watershed scale. Water Resources Research 45: W07401, DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007549.
- Scher H, Margolin G, Metzler R, Klafter J, Berkowitz B. 2002. The dynamical foundation of fractal stream chemistry: the origin of extremely long retention times. Geophysical Research Letters 29: 1061. 1010.1029/2001GL014123.
- Shapiro AM, Cvetkovic V. 1988. Stochastic analysis of solute travel time in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resources Research 24: 1711–1718.
- Simic E, Destouni G. 1999. Water and solute residence times in a catchment: Stochastic model interpretation of 18O transport. Water Resources Research 35: 2109–2119.
- Soulsby C, Tetzlaff D. 2008. Towards simple approaches for mean residence time estimation in ungauged basins using tracers and soil distributions. Journal of Hydrology 363(1–4): 60–74.
- Soulsby C, Tetzlaff D, Rodgers P, Dunn S, Waldron S. 2006. Runoff processes, stream water residence times and controlling landscape characteristics in a mesoscale catchment: an initial evaluation. Journal of Hydrology 325: 197–221.
- Stewart MK, McDonnell JJ. 1991. Modeling base flow soil water residence times from deuterium concentrations. Water Resources Research 27: 2681–2693.
- Stewart MK, Mehlhorn J, Elliott S. 2007. Hydrometric and natural tracer (oxygen-18, silica, tritium and sulphur hexafluoride) evidence for a dominant groundwater contribution to Pukemanga Stream, New Zealand. Hydrological Processes 21: 3340–3356.
- Stumpp C, Stichler W, Maloszewski P. 2009. Application of the environmental isotope delta O-18 to study water flow in unsaturated soils planted with different crops: Case study of a weighable lysimeter from the research field in Neuherberg, Germany. Journal of Hydrology 368: 68–78.
- Taylor S, Feng X, Kirchner JW, Osterhuber R, Klaue B, Renshaw CE. 2001. Isotopic evolution of a seasonal snowpack and its melt. Water Resources Research 37: 759–770.
- Tetzlaff D, Seibert J, Soulsby C. 2009a. Inter-catchment comparison to assess the influence of topography and soils on catchment transit times in a geomorphic province; the Cairngorm mountains, Scotland. Hydrological Processes 23: 1874–1886.
- Tetzlaff D, Seibert J, McGuire KJ, Laudon H, Burns DA, Dunn SM, Soulsby C. 2009b. How does landscape structure influence catchment transit time across different geomorphic provinces?. Hydrological Processes 23: 945–953.
- Vaché KB, McDonnell JJ. 2006. A process-based rejectionist framework for evaluating catchment runoff model structure. Water Resources Research 42: W02409. DOI:02410.01029/02005WR004247.
- Zhang D, Beven K, Mermoud A. 2006. A comparison of non-linear least square and GLUE for model calibration and uncertainty estimation for pesticide transport in soils. Advances in Water Resources 29: 1924–1933.
- Zuber A. 1986. On the interpretation of tracer data in variable flow systems. Journal of Hydrology 86: 45–57.
