Volume 44, Issue 8 pp. 1976-1990
CLINICAL REVIEW

Scoping review of approaches used for remote-access parathyroidectomy: A contemporary review of techniques, tools, pros and cons

Yoshiyuki Saito MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Yoshiyuki Saito MD, PhD

Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Endocrine Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Department of Surgery, International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence

Yoshiyuki Saito, Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Endocrine Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Yoshifumi Ikeda MD, PhD

Yoshifumi Ikeda MD, PhD

Department of Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare, Atami Hospital, Atami, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroshi Takami MD, PhD

Hiroshi Takami MD, PhD

Department of Surgery, Ito Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Amr H. Abdelhamid Ahmed MBBCH, MMSc

Amr H. Abdelhamid Ahmed MBBCH, MMSc

Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Endocrine Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Atsushi Nakao MD

Atsushi Nakao MD

Department of Surgery Gastroenterology Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroshi Katoh MD, PhD

Hiroshi Katoh MD, PhD

Department of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Keiso Ho MD

Keiso Ho MD

Department of Surgery, International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masato Tomita MD, PhD

Masato Tomita MD, PhD

Department of Surgery, International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Michio Sato MD, PhD

Michio Sato MD, PhD

Department of Surgery, International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Neil S. Tolley MD

Neil S. Tolley MD

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Gregory W. Randolph MD

Gregory W. Randolph MD

Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Endocrine Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 April 2022
Citations: 1

Abstract

After our coauthors described the first remote-access parathyroidectomy (RAP) series in 2000, several other approaches were developed. No systematic review has been performed to classify and evaluate RAP techniques. We performed a literature search using PubMed and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). A total of 71 studies met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. RAP can be categorized into five approaches: (1) endoscopic and robotic axillary, (2) anterior chest, (3) transoral, (4) retroauricular, and (5) a combination of these approaches. The limited data in the literature suggest that the cure rates and safety of RAP are in no way inferior to those of open parathyroidectomy. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and the recommendations for the selection of each approach are listed. The selection of approach methods might depend on the surgeon's experience and familiarity and the patient's preference and disease status.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data are available on request from the authors.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.