Proton versus photon radiation–induced cell death in head and neck cancer cells
Li Wang MD, PhD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorShichao Han MD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Department of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Search for more papers by this authorJinming Zhu MD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Search for more papers by this authorXiaochun Wang PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorYuting Li PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorZeming Wang BS
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorEric Lin MS
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorXiaofang Wang MD, PhD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorDavid P. Molkentine BS
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorPierre Blanchard MD
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Search for more papers by this authorYining Yang MS
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorRuiping Zhang MS
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorNarayan Sahoo PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorMichael Gillin PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorXiaorong Ronald Zhu PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorXiaodong Zhang PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorJeffrey N. Myers MD, PhD
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Steven J. Frank MD
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Correspondence
Steven J. Frank, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 1422, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLi Wang MD, PhD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorShichao Han MD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Department of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Search for more papers by this authorJinming Zhu MD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Search for more papers by this authorXiaochun Wang PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorYuting Li PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorZeming Wang BS
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorEric Lin MS
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorXiaofang Wang MD, PhD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorDavid P. Molkentine BS
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorPierre Blanchard MD
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Search for more papers by this authorYining Yang MS
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorRuiping Zhang MS
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorNarayan Sahoo PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorMichael Gillin PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorXiaorong Ronald Zhu PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorXiaodong Zhang PhD
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorJeffrey N. Myers MD, PhD
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Steven J. Frank MD
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Correspondence
Steven J. Frank, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 1422, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
Photon (X-ray) radiotherapy (XRT) kills cells via DNA damage, however, how proton radiotherapy (PRT) causes cell death in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unclear. We investigated mechanisms of HNSCC cell death after XRT versus PRT.
Methods
We assessed type of death in 2 human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and two HPV-negative cell lines: necrosis and apoptosis (Annexin-V fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]); senescence (β-galactosidase); and mitotic catastrophe (γ-tubulin and diamidino-phenylindole [DAPI]).
Results
The XRT-induced or PRT-induced cellular senescence and mitotic catastrophe in all cell lines studied suggested that PRT caused cell death to a greater extent than XRT. After PRT, mitotic catastrophe peaked in HPV-negative and HPV-positive cells at 48 and 72 hours, respectively. No obvious differences were noted in the extent of cell necrosis or apoptosis after XRT versus PRT.
Conclusion
Under the conditions and in the cell lines reported here, mitotic catastrophe and senescence were the major types of cell death induced by XRT and PRT, and PRT may be more effective.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Steven J. Frank is an advisory board member and consultant for Varian Medical Systems.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
hed25357-sup-0001-FigureS1A.TIFapplication/tif, 220.2 KB | Fig. S1. Necrosis and apoptosis in four head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines after photon (XRT) or proton (PRT) irradiation. Two HPV-negative cell lines (SqCC/Y1 and HN5) and two HPV+ cell lines (UPCI-SCC-154 and UMSCC-47) were exposed to a single 4-Gy dose of XRT or PRT. At 4 hours, 24 hours, or 48 hours after irradiation, cells were subjected to terminal deoxy-nucleotidyltransferase (TdT) dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay and incubated with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and propidium iodide and analyzed by BD Accuri C6. Percentages of necrotic or apoptotic cells were quantified with FlowJo V10 software. Panel A-D: Representative flow cytometry plots for each cell line. |
hed25357-sup-0001-FigureS1B.TIFapplication/tif, 208.5 KB | Fig. S1B. |
hed25357-sup-0001-FigureS1C.TIFapplication/tif, 183 KB | Fig. S1C. |
hed25357-sup-0001-FigureS1D.TIFapplication/tif, 217.3 KB | Fig. S1D. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60: 277-300.
- 2 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2010. Cancer in Australia 2010: an Overview. Cancer series no. 60. Cat. no. CAN 56. Canberra: AIHW. http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442472459. Accessed December 16, 2015.
- 3Grégoire V, Lefebvre JL, Licitra L, Felip E, EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Guidelines Working Group. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21: v184-v186.
- 4Setton J, Lee NY, Riaz N, et al. A multi-institution pooled analysis of gastrotomy tube dependence in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer. 2015; 121: 294-301.
- 5Machtay M, Moughan J, Trotti A, et al. Factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 3582-3589.
- 6Cannon DM, Geye HM, Hartig GK, et al. Increased local failure risk with prolonged radiation treatment time in head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy. Head Neck. 2014; 36: 1120-1125.
- 7 PTCOG: Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group. [updated December 10, 2013]. http://ptcog.web.psi.ch. Accessed December 16, 2015.
- 8Durante M, Loeffler JS. Charged particles in radiation oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010; 7: 37-43.
- 9Simone CB, Ly D, Dan TD, et al. Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2011; 101: 376-382.
- 10Sio TT, Lin HK, Shi Q, et al. Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: first comparative results of patient-reported outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 95: 1107-1114.
- 11Blanchard P, Garden AS, Gunn GB, et al. Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - a case matched analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2016; 120: 48-55.
- 12Holliday EB, Kocak-Uzel E, Feng L, et al. Dosimetric advantages of intensity modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer compared with intensity-modulated radiation: a case-matched control analysis. Med Dosim. 2016; 41: 189-194.
- 13Romesser PB, Cahlon O, Scher E, et al. Proton beam radiation therapy results in significantly reduced toxicity compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck tumors that require ipsilateral radiation. Radiother Oncol. 2016; 118: 286-292.
- 14Echarri MJ, Lopez-Martin A, Hitt R. Targeted therapy in locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-R/M HNSC). Cancers (Basel). 2016; 8: E27.
- 15Ausoni S, Boscolo-Rizzo P, Singh B, et al. Targeting cellular and molecular drivers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: current options and emerging perspectives. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016; 35: 413-426.
- 16Yamamoto VN, Thylur DS, Bauschard M, Schmale I, Sinha UK. Overcoming radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2016; 63: 44-51.
- 17Perri F, Pacelli R, Della Vittoria Scarpati G, et al. Radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: biological bases and therapeutic implications. Head Neck. 2015; 37(5): 763-770.
- 18Frese MC, Yu VK, Stewart RD, Carlson DJ. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 83: 442-450.
- 19Bedford JS. Sublethal damage, potentially lethal damage, and chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells exposed to ionizing radiations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991; 21: 1457-1469.
- 20Frankenberg-Schwager M, Frankenberg D, Blocher D, Adamczyk C. Effect of dose rate on the induction of DNA double-strand breaks in eucaryotic cells. Radiat Res. 1981; 87: 710-717.
- 21Ross GM. Induction of cell death by radiotherapy. Endocr Relat Cancer. 1999; 6: 41-44.
- 22Prise KM, Schettino G, Folkard M, Held KD. New insights on cell death from radiation exposure. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 520-528.
- 23Eriksson D, Stigbrand T. Radiation-induced cell death mechanisms. Tumour Biol. 2010; 31: 363-372.
- 24Golden EB, Pellicciotta I, Demaria S, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Formenti SC. The convergence of radiation and immunogenic cell death signaling pathways. Front Oncol. 2012; 2: 88.
- 25Verheij M. Clinical biomarkers and imaging for radiotherapy-induced cell death. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008; 27: 471-480.
- 26Green LM, Murray DK, Bant AM, et al. Response of thyroid follicular cells to gamma irradiation compared to proton irradiation. I. Initial characterization of DNA damage, micronucleus formation, apoptosis, cell survival, and cell cycle phase redistribution. Radiat Res. 2001; 155: 32-42.
- 27Grosse N, Fontana AO, Hug EB, et al. Deficiency in homologous recombination renders mammalian cells more sensitive to proton versus photon irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88: 175-181.
- 28Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Anderson WF, Gillison ML. Incidence trends for human papillomavirus-related and -unrelated oral squamous cell carcinomas in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 612-619.
- 29Chung CH, Gillison ML. Human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer: its role in pathogenesis and clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 6758-6762.
- 30D'Souza G, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R, et al. Case control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1944-1956.
- 31Psyrri A, Gouveris P, Vermorken JB. Human papillomavirus-related head and neck tumors: clinical and research implication. Curr Opin Oncol. 2009; 21: 201-205.
- 32Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 24-35.
- 33Marur S, D'Souza G, Westra WH, Forastiere AA. HPV-associated head and neck cancer: a virus-related cancer epidemic. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 781-789.
- 34Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfield K, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA TRS-398 V12 International Atomic Energy Agency, June 2006.
- 35Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, et al. AAPM's TG 51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999; 26: 1847-1870.
- 36Wang L, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Human papillomavirus status and the relative biological effectiveness of proton radiotherapy in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2017; 39: 708-715.
- 37Vakifahmetoglu H, Olsson M, Zhivotovsky B. Death through a tragedy: mitotic catastrophe. Cell Death Differ. 2008; 15: 1153-1162.
- 38Amé JC, Fouquerel E, Gauthier LR, et al. Radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe in PARG-deficient cells. J Cell Sci. 2009; 122: 1990-2002.
- 39Xu X, Fan Z, Liang C, et al. A signature motif in LIM proteins mediates binding to checkpoint proteins and increases tumor radiosensitivity. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 14059.
- 40Fragkos M, Beard P. Mitotic catastrophe occurs in the absence of apoptosis in p53-null cells with a defective G1 checkpoint. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8): e22946.
- 41Amornwichet N, Oike T, Shibata A, et al. Carbon-ion beam irradiation kills X-ray-resistant p53-null cancer cells by inducing mitotic catastrophe. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12): e115121.
- 42Wang X, Wu E, Wu J, Wang TL, Hsieh HP, Liu X. An antimitotic and antivascular agent BPR0L075 overcomes multidrug resistance and induces mitotic catastrophe in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6): e65686.
- 43Kundu S, Kim TH, Yoon JH, et al. Viriditoxin regulates apoptosis and autophagy via mitotic catastrophe and microtubule formation human prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2014; 45(6): 2331-2340.
- 44Shen L, Au WY, Wong KY, et al. Cell death by bortezomib-induced mitotic catastrophe in natural killer lymphoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008; 7(12): 3807-3815.
- 45Castedo M, Perfettini JL, Roumier T, Andreau K, Medema R, Kroemer G. Cell death by mitotic catastrophe: a molecular definition. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 2825-2837.
- 46Bourke E, Dodson H, Merdes A, et al. DNA damage induces chk1-dependent centrosome amplification. EMBO Rep. 2007; 8: 603-609.
- 47Dodson H, Wheatley SP, Morrison CG. Involvement of centrosome amplification in radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe. Cell Cycle. 2007; 6: 364-370.
- 48Eriksson D, Löfroth PO, Johansson L, Riklund KA, Stigbrand T. Cell cycle disturbances and mitotic catastrophes in HeLa hep2 cells following 2.5 to 10 Gy of ionizing radiation. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13: 5501s-5508s.
- 49Riesterer O, Matsumoto F, Wang L, et al. A novel Chk inhibitor, XL-844, increases human cancer cell radiosensitivity through promotion of mitotic catastrophe. Invest New Drugs. 2011; 29: 514-522.
- 50Ianzini F, Mackey MA. Delayed DNA damage associated with mitotic catastrophe following X-irradiation of HeLa S3 cells. Mutagenesis. 1998; 13: 337-344.
- 51Blank M, Lerenthal Y, Mittelman L, Shiloh Y. Condensin I recruitment and uneven chromatin condensation precede mitotic cell death in response to DNA damage. J Cell Biol. 2006; 174: 195-206.
- 52Wang L, Zhang P, Molkentine DP, et al. TRIP12 as a mediator of human papillomavirus/p16-related radiation enhancement effects. Oncogene. 2017; 36: 820-828.
- 53Gewirtz DA, Holt SE, Elmore LW. Accelerated senescence: an emerging role in tumor cell response to chemotherapy and radiation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008; 76: 947-957.
- 54Gewirtz DA, Alotaibi M, Yakovlev VA, Povirk LF. Tumor cell recovery from senescence induced by radiation with PARP inhibition. Radiat Res. 2016; 186: 327-332.
- 55Sano D, Xie TX, Ow TJ, et al. Disruptive TP53 mutation is associated with aggressive disease characteristics in an orthotopic murine model of oral tongue cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17: 6658-6670.
- 56Coppé JP1, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010; 5: 99-118.
- 57Xue W, Zender L, Miething C, et al. Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas. Nature. 2007; 445: 656-660.
- 58Guerrero A, Gil J. HMGB2 holds the key to the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. J Cell Biol. 2016; 215: 297-299.
- 59Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T. Cellular senescence: a translational perspective. EBioMedicine. 2017; S2352-S3964(17): 30154-30158.
- 60Demaria M, O'Leary MN, Chang J, et al. Cellular senescence promotes adverse effects of chemotherapy and cancer relapse. Cancer Discov. 2017; 7: 165-176.
- 61Brown JM, Attardi LD. The role of apoptosis in cancer development and treatment response. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5(3): 231-237.
- 62Skinner HD, Sandulache VC, Ow TJ, et al. TP53 disruptive mutations lead to head and neck cancer treatment failure through inhibition of radiation-induced senescence. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(1): 290-300.
- 63Zhang X, Lin SH, Fang B, Gillin M, Mohan R, Chang JY. Therapy-resistant cancer stem cells have differing sensitivity to photon versus proton beam radiation. J Thorac Oncol. 2013; 8: 1484-1491.
- 64Ghosh S, Bhat NN, Santra S, et al. Low energy proton beam induces efficient cell killing in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Invest. 2010; 28: 615-622.
- 65Lee KB, Kim KR, Huh TL, Lee YM. Proton induces apoptosis of hypoxic tumor cells by the p53-dependent and p38/JNK MAPK signaling pathways. Int J Oncol. 2008; 33: 1247-1256.
- 66Das A, McDonald DG, Dixon-Mah YN, et al. RIP1 and RIP3 complex regulates radiation-induced programmed necrosis in glioblastoma. Tumour Biol. 2016; 37: 7525-7534.
- 67Nehs MA, Lin CI, Kozono DE, et al. Necroptosis is a novel mechanism of radiation-induced cell death in anaplastic thyroid and adrenocortical cancers. Surgery. 2011; 150: 1032-1039.
- 68Degterev A, Hitomi J, Germscheid M, et al. Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol. 2008; 4: 313-321.