Volume 39, Issue 8 pp. 1689-1695
Original Article

Efficacy of a high-observation protocol in major head and neck cancer surgery: A prospective study

Brittany Barber MD

Corresponding Author

Brittany Barber MD

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Brittany Barber and Jeffrey Harris contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author: B. Barber, Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 1E4, Walter Mackenzie Centre, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Harris MD, MHA, FRCSC

Jeffrey Harris MD, MHA, FRCSC

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Brittany Barber and Jeffrey Harris contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Cameron Shillington BSc

Cameron Shillington BSc

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Shannon Rychlik BScN

Shannon Rychlik BScN

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph Dort MD, MSc, FRCSC

Joseph Dort MD, MSc, FRCSC

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Meier MD, FRCSC

Michael Meier MD, FRCSC

Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Angela Estey MA-HEd

Angela Estey MA-HEd

Alberta Provincial Cancer Strategic Clinical Network (SCN), Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Adam Elwi PhD

Adam Elwi PhD

Alberta Provincial Cancer Strategic Clinical Network (SCN), Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Patty Wickson MBA

Patty Wickson MBA

Alberta Provincial Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network (SCN), Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Buss MD, FRCPC

Michael Buss MD, FRCPC

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
David Zygun MD, MSc, FRCPC

David Zygun MD, MSc, FRCPC

Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Kal Ansari MD, Med, FRCSC

Kal Ansari MD, Med, FRCSC

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Vincent Biron MD, PhD, FRCSC

Vincent Biron MD, PhD, FRCSC

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel O'Connell MD, MSc, FRCSC

Daniel O'Connell MD, MSc, FRCSC

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Hadi Seikaly MD, MAL, FRCSC

Hadi Seikaly MD, MAL, FRCSC

Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 June 2017
Citations: 3

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to optimize an existing clinical care pathway (CCP) for head and neck cancer with a high-observation protocol (HOP) and to determine the effect on length of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay in hospital (LOS).

Methods

The HOP mandated initiation of spontaneous breathing trials before the conclusion of the surgery, weaning of sedation, and limiting mechanical ventilation. All patients with head and neck cancer undergoing primary surgery on the HOP were compared to a historical cohort regarding length of ICU admission, ICU readmissions, and LOS.

Results

Ninety-six and 52 patients were observed in “historical” and “HOP” cohorts. The length of ICU admission (1.9 vs 1.2 days; p = .021), LOS (20.3 vs 14.1 days; p = .020), and ICU readmissions (10.4% vs 1.9%; p = .013) were significantly decreased in the “HOP” cohort.

Conclusion

Rapid weaning of sedation and limiting mechanical ventilation may contribute to a shorter length of ICU admission and LOS, as well as decreased ICU readmissions. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1689–1695, 2016

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.