Volume 37, Issue 2 pp. 229-233
Original Article

Diagnostic role of core needle biopsy in cervical lymphadenopathy

Yoon-Jong Ryu MD

Yoon-Jong Ryu MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Wonjae Cha MD

Wonjae Cha MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Woo-Jin Jeong MD

Woo-Jin Jeong MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Sang Il Choi MD

Sang Il Choi MD

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Soon-Hyun Ahn MD

Corresponding Author

Soon-Hyun Ahn MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Corresponding author: S.-H. Ahn, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Goomi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Kyunggi-Do, 463-707, Seoul, South Korea. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 December 2013
Citations: 30

ABSTRACT

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of core needle biopsy (CNB) compared to fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in cervical lymphadenopathy.

Methods

This consecutive case series enrolled 208 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated and the necessity of an additional open biopsy was compared.

Results

The sensitivity and NPV for critical disease (lymphoma, carcinoma, and tuberculosis) were significantly higher with CNB (p = .006, p = .001, respectively) than with FNAC. In the analysis based on specific disease, the sensitivity of CNB was statistically significantly higher (p = .009) for the diagnosis of lymphoma. The rate of open biopsy for confirmative diagnosis was significantly lower with CNB (p = .014).

Conclusion

CNB is beneficial for initial examination in cervical lymphadenopathy and showed higher sensitivity and NPV than FNAC. It is especially useful for screening for lymphoma. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 37: 229-233, 2015

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.