Volume 27, Issue 3 pp. 509-524
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Optimal compensation rule under provider adverse selection and moral hazard

Yaping Wu

Yaping Wu

Institute of Economics and Finance, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yijuan Chen

Yijuan Chen

Research School of Economics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sanxi Li

Corresponding Author

Sanxi Li

School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

Correspondence

Sanxi Li, School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 10072, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 September 2017
Citations: 6

Summary

Although healthcare provider payments have been studied extensively in the literature, little is known about the optimal compensation rule when, in addition to unobservable provider effort (moral hazard), the provider's ability type is also private information (adverse selection). We find that when only provider effort is unobservable, to induce the first-best outcome the optimal compensation rule requires zero fee-for-service. When both provider moral hazard and adverse selection exist, the first-best outcome will be infeasible. The second-best compensation rule entails combined use of capitation, fee-for-service, and pay-for-performance.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.