Volume 1, Issue 2 pp. 117-133
Article
Full Access

Functional MRI mapping of stimulus rate effects across visual processing stages

Walter Schneider

Corresponding Author

Walter Schneider

Psychology Department and Pittsburgh NMR Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15260Search for more papers by this author
B. J. Casey

B. J. Casey

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Child Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Douglas Noll

Douglas Noll

Pittsburgh NMR Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 1994
Citations: 36

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to record cortical activation across multiple stages in the visual system during single character visual search and reversing checkerboard stimulation. Scanning used T2-weighted, gradient echo sequences with late echo times (TE = 36 ms) with a voxel size of 0.94 * 1.88 mm in-plane resolution, 4–5 mm deep, on a conventional scanner. A scout experiment recorded six slices to identify major regions of activation. Two slices were selected for extensive assessment. Character stimuli activated small (average 16 mm2), reliable, statistically defined regions of activation in the calcarine fissure, superior occipital cortex, and fusiform-lingual gyrus. The results include: (1) for character search, the MRI signal change increased linearly from 2.1 to 3.1% for stimulation from 1 to 8 Hz; (2) the character rate effect was equivalent across three levels of the visual system; (3) the checkerboard stimuli showed broader, more intense primary visual activation and less intense secondary visual activation than did character search. Issues relating to fMRI signal variability across the imagining plane, statistical data analysis, signal sensitivity, statistical power, fMRI experimental protocols, and comparisons with positron emission tomography (PET) data are discussed. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.