RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Resting state functional network switching rate is differently altered in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder

Shaoqiang Han

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Qian Cui,

Corresponding Author

Qian Cui

[email protected]

MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

School of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Correspondence

Huafu Chen, The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Email: [email protected]

Qian Cui, School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Xiao Wang,

Xiao Wang

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Liang Li,

Liang Li

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Di Li,

Di Li

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Zongling He,

Zongling He

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Xiaonan Guo,

Xiaonan Guo

orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-4478

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Yun-Shuang Fan,

Yun-Shuang Fan

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Jing Guo,

Jing Guo

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Wei Sheng,

Wei Sheng

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Fengmei Lu,

Fengmei Lu

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Huafu Chen,

Corresponding Author

Huafu Chen

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-4062-4753

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Correspondence

Email: [email protected]

Qian Cui, School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Shaoqiang Han,

Shaoqiang Han

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Qian Cui,

Corresponding Author

Qian Cui

[email protected]

MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

School of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Correspondence

Email: [email protected]

Qian Cui, School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Xiao Wang,

Xiao Wang

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Liang Li,

Liang Li

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Di Li,

Di Li

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Zongling He,

Zongling He

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Xiaonan Guo,

Xiaonan Guo

orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-4478

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Yun-Shuang Fan,

Yun-Shuang Fan

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Jing Guo,

Jing Guo

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Wei Sheng,

Wei Sheng

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Fengmei Lu,

Fengmei Lu

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Huafu Chen,

Corresponding Author

Huafu Chen

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-4062-4753

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Correspondence

Email: [email protected]

Qian Cui, School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 13 May 2020

https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25017

Citations: 64

Funding information: China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant, Grant/Award Number: 2019M653383; Youth Innovation Project of Sichuan Provincial Medical Association, Grant/Award Number: Q14014; Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Medical Association, Grant/Award Number: S15012; Key Project of Research and Development of Ministry of Science and Technology, Grant/Award Number: 2018AAA0100705; Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 81771919, U1808204, 61533006

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

The clinical misdiagnosis ratio of bipolar disorder (BD) patients to major depressive disorder (MDD) patients is high. Recent findings hypothesize that the ability to flexibly recruit functional neural networks is differently altered in BD and MDD patients. This study aimed to explore distinct aberrance of network flexibility during dynamic networks configuration in BD and MDD patients. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging of 40 BD patients, 61 MDD patients, and 61 matched healthy controls were recruited. Dynamic functional connectivity matrices for each subject were constructed with a sliding window method. Then, network switching rate of each node was calculated and compared among the three groups. BD and MDD patients shared decreased network switching rate of regions including left precuneus, bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, and bilateral dorsal medial prefrontal cortex. Apart from these regions, MDD patients presented specially decreased network switching rate in the bilateral anterior insula, left amygdala, and left striatum. Taken together, BD and MDD patients shared decreased network switching rate of key hubs in default mode network and MDD patients presented specially decreased switching rate in salience network and striatum. We found shared and distinct aberrance of network flexibility which revealed altered adaptive functions during dynamic networks configuration of BD and MDD.

1 INTRODUCTION

The clinical identification of BD patients under depressive state from MDD patients on the basis of symptomology only is a challenge (Kamat et al., 2008). The BD misdiagnosis rate is up to 69% (Hirschfeld, Lewis, & Vornik, 2003), resulting in improper treatment, high medical costs, and poor outcomes (Hirschfeld et al., 2003; Keck, Kessler, & Ross, 2008). Nowadays, researchers begin to focus their attention on finding robust biological markers with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to distinguish BD from MDD.

Depression is hypothesized to be linked to deficient adaptive functions (Ellard et al., 2018). Resting state functional networks, such as default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN), are found to be linked to key adaptive functions including emotion regulation, attentional control, and self-monitoring (Seeley et al., 2007; Yeo et al., 2011). Deficits in these networks lead to dysfunction of emotion and attention across mood states in depression (Sheppes, Suri, & Gross, 2015). For example, DMN is in charge of self-monitoring (Yeo et al., 2011), and deficit in DMN results in rumination in depression (Eshel & Roiser, 2010; Pizzagalli, Dan, Hallett, Ratner, & Fava, 2009). SN plays a vital role in emotional control, processing of interoceptive states and modulating network switching between DMN and central executive network (CEN) (Devarajan, Levitin, & Vinod, 2008; Goulden et al., 2014; Terasawa, Fukushima, & Umeda, 2013). Overreliance upon endogenous cues resulted from altered SN is related to reduced motivation to interact with external environment in depression (Nolen-Hoeksema, Wisco, & Lyubomirsky, 2008). What is more, recent findings hint that adaptive processes might be differently altered in BD and MDD patients (Ellard et al., 2018). For example, the functional connectivity of the anterior insula and amygdala distinguishes BD from MDD patients (Ambrosi et al., 2017; Sheppes et al., 2015), suggesting distinctly pathophysiological mechanisms of emotional dysfunction (Ambrosi et al., 2017). When recalling autobiographical memory, the activity amygdala in BD patients is different from that in MDD patients (Young, Bodurka, & Drevets, 2016). BD and MD patients exhibit robust group specific alterations in large-scale brain networks (Goya-Maldonado et al., 2016), especially alteration of key hubs in adaptive functions (Ellard et al., 2018). However, previous studies ignore the dynamics of the brain function and do not directly explore dynamic networks configuration that is needed in adaptive regulation.

Investigation of network dynamics is one of the emerging frontiers of network neuroscience (Bassett & Sporns, 2017). The brain function is dynamic even in the resting state (Hellyer et al., 2014; Sakoğlu et al., 2010). The dynamic exchange of information occurs within and between networks (Hutchison, Thilo, Gati, Stefan, & Menon, 2013), along with networks configuration (Allen et al., 2014; Xiao & Duyn, 2013). These time varying interactions enable the brain to dynamically integrate and coordinate different neural systems in response to internal and external stimuli (Hutchison et al., 2013). Investigating dynamics of the brain function provides subtle insight into dynamic network reconstruction and temporal evolution of the human brain in various neurological and psychiatric conditions (Avena-Koenigsberger, Misic, & Sporns, 2017; Calhoun, Miller, Pearlson, & Adalı, 2014). However, it is a challenge to explore dynamic networks configuration. A novel method named multilayer network analysis offers the possibility of detecting the dynamic networks configuration across time and space. On the basis of the algorithm, the time-resolved fMRI functional connectivity is divided into non-overlapping modules spanning time and space (Mucha, Thomas, Kevin, Porter, & Jukka-Pekka, 2010). Based on this method, Bassett et al propose node flexibility (or network switching rate [Pedersen, Zalesky, Omidvarnia, & Jackson, 2018]) defined as the percentage of time windows when the node changes to different network assignments (Bassett et al., 2011). Network switching rate is found to be related with learning (Bassett et al., 2011), attention (Shine, Koyejo, & Poldrack, 2016), fatigue (Betzel, Satterthwaite, Gold, & Bassett, 2017), depression (Zheng et al., 2017), and even predicting high-order cognitive functions (Pedersen, Zalesky, et al., 2018). These studies affirm the underlying neurobiological basis of network switching resulted from networks configuration during adaptive functions.

In the current study, we aimed to explore distinct deficits in the adaptive functions in BD and MDD patients. We first constructed dynamic network matrixes (N × N × W for each subject, where N meant the regions in brain atlas in the current study and W meant the number of sliding windows) using a sliding windows method (Allen et al., 2014), then tracked (Mucha et al., 2010) the dynamic networks configuration overtime. Finally, the network switching rate of each node was calculated to measure its flexibility to exchange during networks configuration. On the basis of previous studies, we hypothesized that: (a) BD and MDD patients shared deficits in network switching rate of regions that were responsible for the common clinical symptoms, such as rumination. (b) Considering the fact that BD and MDD patients presented distinctly altered emotion control (Ambrosi et al., 2017; Sheppes et al., 2015), regulatory control (Ellard et al., 2018), and reward processing (Redlich et al., 2015; Whitton, Treadway, & Pizzagalli, 2015), the network switching rate of the key hubs in charge of these processes might be differently altered in BD and MDD patients.

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Participants

Forty BD and 61 MDD patients were recruited from the Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. All patients were interviewed by two experienced psychiatrists using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR-Patient Edition (SCID-P, 2/2001 revision) and diagnosed with BD or MDD on the basis of the DSM-IV criteria. The 24-Item Hamilton Depression Scale was used to evaluate the clinical state of the patients and all patients were under depressive state. Patients were excluded if they met one of the exclusion criteria. The exclusion criteria included schizophrenia, mental retardation, personality disorder, any history of loss of consciousness, substance abuse, and serious medical or neurological illness. In the current study, the patients were excluded if they were diagnosed with anxiety disorder at same time. MDD patients were treated with antidepressants. The drugs administered included one of the selective serotonin and serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. BD patients were treated with antidepressants, mood stabilizer, and antipsychotics.

Considering that most of patients were taking medicine, to measure the effect of medicine on our results, we used a strategy named the total medication load (Redlich et al., 2014; Redlich et al., 2015). As done in previous studies, the antidepressant, mood stabilizer, and antipsychotic medication was first coded as absent (0), low (1), or high (2). The total medicine load was calculated by summing each medication code for each medication category. The details could be seen in our previous work (Han et al., 2018).

Sixty-three healthy controls (HCs) were recruited from the community through poster advertisements and also interviewed using SCID (nonpatient edition). HCs were matched in terms of age, gender, and years of education with the patient groups. No healthy participant had a history of serious medical or neuropsychiatric illness and a family history of major psychiatric or neurological illness in their first-degree relatives.

Written informed consents were obtained from all participants before the experiment. The study was approved by the research ethical committee of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.

2.2 Scan acquisition

All MRI data was acquired with a 3-T GE Discovery MR750 scanner (General Electric, Fairfield, CN). An eight-channel prototype quadrature birdcage head coil fitted with foam padding to minimize head movement was used. All subjects were instructed to relax, to hold still, and to keep their eyes closed during the scan. Functional images were obtained using an echo-planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE = 2,000/30 ms, 43 slices, matrix size = 64 × 64, voxel size = 3.75 × 3.75 × 3.2 mm³, flip angle = 90°, slice thickness = 3.2 mm, no gap, and total 255 volumes.

2.3 Data preprocessing

Functional images were preprocessed using Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI package (http://www.restfmri.net). The following steps were performed in preprocessing stage: (a) removal of the first 15 volumes; (b) slice timing; (c) realignment; (d) normalization to the standard EPI template (resampled into 3 × 3 × 3 mm³), subjects were excluded if the translational and rotational displacement exceeded 3.0 mm or 3.0°. No subject was excluded in this step: (e) smoothing (6 × 6 × 6 mm³ full-width at half maximum Gaussian kernel); (f) detrend to reduce low frequency drift; (g) regression of nuisance covariates, including Friston 24 motion parameters (Satterthwaite et al., 2012), global mean signal, white matter signal, and cerebrospinal fluid signal; and (h) despiking. We replaced the outliners with the optimal estimate using a third-order spline fit to clean the time course portions. Outliners were detected on the basis of the median absolute deviation, as implemented in 3dDespike (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni) (Allen et al., 2014). We also calculated the mean frame-wise displacement (FD) of each subject (Han et al., 2017). No significant difference of mean FD was observed among the three groups by using ANOVA (p = .60).

2.4 Dynamic functional connectivity with a sliding window method

The averaged signals of each region in 246 atlas were extracted (Fan et al., 2016). A sliding windows method was adopted to calculate the dynamic functional connectivity (Allen et al., 2014) where the window length was set to 50 TRs (100 s) and step length was set to the half window length (25 TRs, 50 s) (Guo et al., 2018; Nora & Dimitri, 2015; Pedersen, Omidvarnia, Zalesky, & Jackson, 2018; Zalesky & Breakspear, 2015). Pearson correlation between pair of region signals in each window was calculated. The overall flow chat of analysis was show in Figure 1a. Finally, we would get dynamic networks matrixes (N × N × W) for each subject. Where N meant the regions in brain atlas in the current study and W meant the number of sliding windows.

Details are in the caption following the image — **FIGURE 1**
Open in figure viewer PowerPoint

(a) Flow chart of analysis steps. The original images were preprocessed. The mean values of 246 atlas were extracted to build dynamic functional matrix for each subject. Then, an iterative and ordinal Louvain algorithm was used to track dynamic network modulation over time. Finally, network switching rate was calculated and compared among three groups with ANOVA. (b) An overview of network switching rate. The windows meant the sliding windows in dynamic functional connectivity. The red and blue nodes represented nodes in two different modularity partitions. There were two switching events in this figure (adapted from Mangor et al.)

To exclude the effect of parameter selection like window length and step size on our results, we also validated our results with different window length (window length = 22 TRs, step size = 11 TRs).

2.5 Multilayer modularity and network switching rate

As performed in previous studies (Bassett et al., 2011; Bassett et al., 2013; Pedersen, Zalesky, et al., 2018), an iterative and ordinal Louvain algorithm was used to track dynamic networks configuration over time (Mucha et al., 2010) where parameters were set ω = ϒ = 1 (Bassett et al., 2013; Pedersen, Zalesky, et al., 2018). This multilayer modularity algorithm outputted a 2D array with integer values indicating modules and Q. A higher Q, ranging from zero to one, meant higher network segregation. By now, the dynamic matrixes for each subject were divided into nonoverlapping modules spanning time and space (Mucha et al., 2010). Then the switching rate of each node was calculated as the percentage of time windows when the node changed to a different network assignment (Telesford et al., 2017) (Figure 1b).

2.6 Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA was conducted among the three groups to determine the altered network switching rate of nodes and overall dynamic networks segregation (Q) in MDD and BD patients. In this step, sex, age, and years of education were regressed as covariates. The results of altered network switching rate (for 246 nodes in all) reported here were corrected with false discovery rate (FDR), where p < .05. Then, to explore details about aberrance in BD or MDD, two tailed two sample t test was adopted between BD (or MDD) patients and HCs for nodes whose network switching rate presenting differences among three groups.

2.7 Validation

Considering the effect of window length, we validated our results with window length of 22 TRs and step size of 11 TRs.

To exclude the effect of medicine (or head motion) on observed results, Pearson correlation was calculated between the altered network switching rate of nodes with the total medicine load (or mean FD) with network switching rate of nodes (or Q) in MDD (or BD) patients. In addition, the mean FD was compared among three groups and between BD and MDD patients.

3 RESULTS

3.1 Clinical effects

To determine whether the total sample size was enough in the current study, we done a priori power analysis with G power 3 (Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, & Buchner, 2007) (significant level α = .05, power level = 0.85 or 0.8 and effect size f = 0.25). The total sample size was computed as 180 or 159 (the total sample size in the current study was 164) suggesting the sample size used was basically enough. No significant difference was found among groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, such as age, gender, and year of education. The medicine load index of MDD was lower than that in BD (p < .01). Details could be seen in Table 1.

TABLE 1. Characteristics of subjects

	BD (n = 40)	MDD (n = 61)	HC (n = 63)	p
Age (years), mean ± SD	34.43 ± 10.76	34.56 ± 11.07	31.76 ± 10.50	.29 ^a
Gender, male:female (percent of male)	18:22 (45.00%)	33:28 (54.10%)	33:30 (52.38%)	.65 ^b
Years of education, mean ± SD	13.70 ± 3.03	13.56 ± 3.19	14.16 ± 3.88	.60 ^a
Handedness, right/left	40/0	61/0	62/1	.45 ^a
Age of first onset (years)	27.03 ± 9.57	29.67 ± 10.44	—	.20 ^c
No. of depression episodes	2.63 ± 1.13	2.03 ± 0.98	—	<.01 ^c
Duration of single depressive episode	3.93 ± 2.46	5.30 ± 6.70	—	.06 ^c
HAMD	24.89 ± 5.28	22.93 ± 6.42	—	.10 ^c
Medical medicine load index	3.13 ± 1.34	2.15 ± 0.79	—	<.01 ^c
Percentage of taking medicine	92.50%	98.36%	—	—
Antidepressants (number of patients)
Fluoxetine	3	2
Sertraline	10	10
Paroxetine	7	19
Escitalopram	5	10
Fluvoxamine	0	0
Venlafaxine	3	8
Duloxetine	1	5
Mirtazapine	0	2
Mood stabilizer
Valproate	27	0
Lamotrigine	2	0
Lithium	5	0
Antipsychotics
Olanzapine	9	6
Quetiapine	19	10
Risperidone	2	2
Aripiprazole	2	1

Abbreviations: BD, bipolar disorder; HC, healthy control; MDD, major depressive disorder.
a One-way ANOVA.
b Chi-square t test.
c Two-tailed two sample t test.

3.2 Network switching rate is decreased differently in BD and MDD patients

The overall modularity (Q) significantly differed among the three groups (p = .046 for ANOVA). Specially, the Q significantly decreased in MDD patients compared with HCs (p = .018 for two sample t test). There was no significant difference between BD patients and HCs (Figure S1).

The three groups presented significantly different network switching rate of regions in DMN (left precuneus, bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, and bilateral dorsal medial prefrontal cortex [dMPFC]), SN (bilateral anterior insula and left amygdala) and the left striatum (p < .05, FDR corrected).

The post hoc results demonstrated that both BD and MDD patients presented decreased network switching rate of regions in DMN (left precuneus and bilateral dMPFC) (Figure 2). While, MDD patients also presented decreased network switching rate in SN, and left striatum (Figures 3 and 4). What is more, MDD patients presented significantly lower network switching rate in SN and left striatum compared with BD patients (Figure 3). The details were showed in Table S1.

3.3 Validation

Our results reported above could be validated with different window length and step size (Table S2). There was no significant difference of mean FD among three groups (p = .60 for ANOVA). The mean FD in BD patients was not significantly different from that in MDD patients (p = .35 for two sample t test). The correlations between medicine load (and mean FD) with altered network switching rate of nodes were all not significant (p > .05).

4 DISCUSSION

In the current study, we explored distinctly altered dynamic networks configuration with network switching rate in BD and MDD patients. As we assumed, BD and MDD patients shared decreased network switching rate in the key hubs of DMN, including left precuneus and bilateral dMPFC. These results suggested shared inability to navigate away from internal emotional and cognitive states across depressed BD and MD patients. Apart from these regions, MDD patients also presented a decrease in network switching rate of SN and striatum. Moreover, network switching rate of SN and striatum in MDD patients was significantly lower than that in BD patients. These results might reflect special deficient switching ability and emotion regulation in MDD patients. We found shared and distinct aberrance of network flexibility which revealed altered adaptive functions during dynamic networks configuration of BD and MDD.

4.1 BD and MDD patients shared decreased network switching rate in DMN

In our results, BD and MDD patients shared decreased network switching rate in DMN. The decreased network switching rate of MDD might reflect inability to navigate away from internal emotional and cognitive states in depression (Greicius et al., 2007; Whitfieldgabrieli & Ford, 2012).The DMN was in charge of various functions, such as self-referential thinking, remembering the past, and focusing on beliefs (Buckner & Vincent, 2007; Raichle & Snyder, 2007). Dysfunction of DMN was found across BD and MDD patients (Martino et al., 2016; Meda et al., 2014; Mulders, van Eijndhoven, Schene, Beckmann, & Tendolkar, 2015). For example, MDD patients presented reduced DMN task suppression during emotion perception and judgment (Grimm et al., 2009) and during passive viewing and reappraisal of negative pictures (Sheline et al., 2009). The hyperactivity in task performance and increased connectivity of DMN were found in depressed subjects, this might reflect the inability to navigate away from their internal emotional and cognitive states (such as, rumination) (Greicius et al., 2007; Whitfieldgabrieli & Ford, 2012). The excessive DMN functional connectivity could be seen even in recovered-state MDD patients (Nixon et al., 2013). The hyperactivity of DMN might be resulted from incapable suppression of DMN (Hamilton et al., 2011). The under activation and reduced global brain connectivity of dMPFC, a key region in emotion regulation (Cole & Schneider, 2007; Ochsner & Gross, 2005), were found in depressed patients (Murrough et al., 2016; Siegle, Wesley, Carter, Steinhauer, & Thase, 2007). In line with these findings, we observed decreased network switching rate of regions in DMN in BD and MDD. These results might reflect reduced cognitive flexibility and reduced emotion regulation capacity associated with depressed patients (Murrough et al., 2016; Murrough, Iacoviello, Neumeister, Charney, & Dan, 2011).

4.2 MDD patients presented decreased network switching rate in SN compared with HCs

Apart from DMN, the network switching rate of striatum and key hubs in SN was also decreased in MDD patients. The anterior insula was linked to the processing of interoceptive states and adaptive switching between DMN and CEN (Devarajan et al., 2008; Terasawa et al., 2013). The important role of the anterior insula in mapping the visceral autonomic aspects of emotional experience to a high-order cognitive process (Craig, 2003) made it a key structure in integrating cognitive, behavioral, and affective functional processes (Devarajan et al., 2008; Goulden et al., 2014). The anterior insula was a region of particular interest in mood disorders (Goodkind et al., 2015). Overreliance upon endogenous cues was related to reduced motivation to interact with external environment in MDD (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008). The functional connectivity between the anterior insula and DMN was found increased in MDD patients compared with BD patients and HCs (Ellard et al., 2018). The decreased network switching rate of the anterior insula might reflect its impaired switching ability to instantiate regulation away from international, self-focused processing in MDD (Ellard et al., 2018). The amygdala was involved in emotion regulation and sensory information modulation (Price, 2010) and essential for sensory tuning to enable adaptive response (Davis & Whalen, 2001). The impaired flexibly switching of the amygdala might be relevant to emotion dysregulation and attention (cognitive) bias observed in MDD patients (Albert & Newhouse, 2019). The decreased network switching rate hinted decreased ability in adaptive emotion regulation and ability to instantiate regulation away from internal, self-focused processing (Ellard et al., 2018).

4.3 MDD patients presented decreased network switching rate in SN and striatum compared with BD

The network switching rate of regions in SN (anterior insula and amygdala) and striatum, was significantly lower in MDD patients compared with BD patients and HCs. Previous studies found structural and functional anomalies of these regions (SN and striatum) in BD patients, suggesting altered emotion regulation and reward processes (Albert & Newhouse, 2019; Ambrosi et al., 2017; Ellard et al., 2018; Han, De Berardis, Fornaro, & Kim, 2018; Satterthwaite et al., 2015). We found no significantly altered network switching rate of these regions in BD patients compared with HCs. The reason might be that dynamic methods provide distinct insight into neuromechanism of depression (Han et al., 2019; Kaiser et al., 2015). However, consistent with previous studies (Albert & Newhouse, 2019; Ambrosi et al., 2017; Ellard et al., 2018), the network switching ability of these regions was significant different between BD and MDD patients. Combing previous findings, our results provided new insight into the different neural pathogenesis between MDD and BD. Dysfunction of these regions in BD patients might be more related to deficits in steady coordination with other regions (Albert & Newhouse, 2019; Ambrosi et al., 2017; Ellard et al., 2018) while that in MDD patients might be related to deficits in dynamic regulation capacity. Although this hypothesis required sufficiently direct evidences, our results affirmed different dysfunction of these regions between BD and MDD patients.

We excluded the effect of head motion and medicine on our results to a certain extent. In our results, no significant difference of the mean FD was found among the three groups. In addition, network switching rate of altered regions was not significantly correlated with mean FD. Our findings were unlikely resulted from the medicinal effect. Although antidepressant treatment may affect the functions of several regions, such as the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, the conclusion was inconsistent (Hibar et al., 2016; Siegle et al., 2007). Dysfunction of these regions was affirmed with unmedicated patients (Cao et al., 2012; Geng et al., 2016; Murrough et al., 2016). Here, we found no significant correlation between network switching rate of altered regions and medicinal load.

A number of limitations must be considered in the current study. First, most patients (BD and MDD) were taking medicine. Although no significant correlation was observed between medicinal load and altered network switching rate in patients, our results should be validated by future studies in the sample of unmedicated patients. Second, patients (BD and MDD) enrolled in our study were under depressive state. The network switching rate might be differently altered in various mood states, such as remitted state (Rive et al., 2015). This hypothesis could be tested in future studies. Third, factors like illness duration which was different in BD and MDD patients, might also affect our results. Last, different aberrance of the network switching rate might also due to many phenotypes shared between BD and MDD but that were not specific to these two disorders, such as chronic stress, poor sleep, feelings of stigma, and so on. Because these phenotypes might be shared with basically any other psychiatry disorder, future studies could recruit other psychiatry disorders to explore specific altered dynamic switching ability across psychiatry disorders.

5 CONCLUSION

We explored distinct deficits in dynamic switching ability in BD and MDD using multilayer network analysis. BD and MDD patients shared decreased network switching ability in DMN. MDD patients presented specially and discriminately decreased network flexibility of SN and striatum compared with BD patients and HCs. Our results suggested shared and distinct aberrance of adaptive functions during dynamic networks configuration of BD and MDD.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Key Project of Research and Development of Ministry of Science and Technology (2018AAA0100705), the Natural Science Foundation of China (61533006, U1808204, 81771919), the Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Medical Association (S15012), the Youth Innovation Project of Sichuan Provincial Medical Association (Q14014), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (Grant No. 2019M653383).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declared no conflict of interest.

Open Research

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Supporting Information

REFERENCES

Albert, K. M., & Newhouse, P. A. (2019). Estrogen, stress, and depression: Cognitive and biological interactions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095557
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095557
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Allen, E. A., Damaraju, E., Plis, S. M., Erhardt, E. B., Eichele, T., & Calhoun, V. D. (2014). Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs352
10.1093/cercor/bhs352
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Ambrosi, E., Arciniegas, D. B., Madan, A., Curtis, K. N., Patriquin, M. A., Jorge, R. E., … Salas, R. (2017). Insula and amygdala resting-state functional connectivity differentiate bipolar from unipolar depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12724
10.1111/acps.12724
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Avena-Koenigsberger, A., Misic, B., & Sporns, O. (2017). Communication dynamics in complex brain networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(1), 17–33.
10.1038/nrn.2017.149
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Bassett, D. S., Porter, M. A., Wymbs, N. F., Grafton, S. T., Carlson, J. M., & Mucha, P. J. (2013). Robust detection of dynamic community structure in networks. Chaos, 23(1), 97–386.
10.1063/1.4790830
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Bassett, D. S., & Sporns, O. (2017). Network neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 353–364.
10.1038/nn.4502
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Bassett, D. S., Wymbs, N. F., Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Carlson, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(18), 7641–7646.
10.1073/pnas.1018985108
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Betzel, R. F., Satterthwaite, T. D., Gold, J. I., & Bassett, D. S. (2017). Positive affect, surprise, and fatigue are correlates of network flexibility. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 520.
10.1038/s41598-017-00425-z
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Buckner, R. L., & Vincent, J. L. (2007). Unrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network correlations. NeuroImage, 37(4), 1091–1096.
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.010
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Calhoun, V., Miller, R., Pearlson, G., & Adalı, T. (2014). The Chronnectome: Time-varying connectivity networks as the next frontier in fMRI data discovery. Neuron, 84(2), 262–274.
10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.015
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Cao, X., Liu, Z., Xu, C., Li, J., Gao, Q., Sun, N., … Zhang, K. (2012). Disrupted resting-state functional connectivity of the hippocampus in medication-naïve patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2–3), 194–203.
10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.002
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Cole, M. W., & Schneider, W. (2007). The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions. NeuroImage, 37(1), 343–360.
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.071
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 500–505.
10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00090-4
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Davis, M., & Whalen, P. J. (2001). The amygdala: Vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry, 6(1), 13–34.
10.1038/sj.mp.4000812
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Devarajan, S., Levitin, D. J., & Vinod, M. (2008). A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(34), 12569–12574.
10.1073/pnas.0800005105
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Ellard, K. K., Zimmerman, J. P., Kaur, N., Kra, V. D., Roffman, J. L., Nierenberg, A. A., … Camprodon, J. A. (2018). Functional connectivity between anterior insula and key nodes of frontoparietal executive control and salience networks distinguish bipolar depression from unipolar depression and healthy control subjects. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(5), S2451902218300272.
10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.01.013
Google Scholar
Eshel, N., & Roiser, J. P. (2010). Reward and punishment processing in depression. Biological Psychiatry, 68(2), 118–124.
10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.01.027
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Fan, L., Li, H., Zhuo, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Chen, L., … Laird, A. R. (2016). The human brainnetome atlas: A new brain atlas based on connectional architecture. Cerebral Cortex, 26(8), 3508–3526.
10.1093/cercor/bhw157
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
10.3758/BF03193146
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Geng, H., Wu, F., Kong, L., Tang, Y., Zhou, Q., Chang, M., … Wang, F. (2016). Disrupted structural and functional connectivity in prefrontal-hippocampus circuitry in first-episode medication-Naïve adolescent depression. PLoS One, 11(2), e0148345.
10.1371/journal.pone.0148345
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Goodkind, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Oathes, D. J., Jiang, Y., Chang, A., Jones-Hagata, L. B., … Korgaonkar, M. S. (2015). Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental illness. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(4), 305–315.
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2206
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Goulden, N., Khusnulina, A., Davis, N. J., Bracewell, R. M., Bokde, A. L., McNulty, J. P., & Mullins, P. G. (2014). The salience network is responsible for switching between the default mode network and the central executive network: Replication from DCM. NeuroImage, 99, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.052
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.052
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Goya-Maldonado, R., Brodmann, K., Keil, M., Trost, S., Dechent, P., & Gruber, O. (2016). Differentiating unipolar and bipolar depression by alterations in large-scale brain networks. Human Brain Mapping, 37(2), 808–818.
10.1002/hbm.23070
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Greicius, M. D., Flores, B. H., Vinod, M., Glover, G. H., Solvason, H. B., Heather, K., … Schatzberg, A. F. (2007). Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: Abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biological Psychiatry, 62(5), 429–437.
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.020
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Grimm, S., Boesiger, P., Beck, J., Schuepbach, D., Bermpohl, F., Walter, M., … Northoff, G. (2009). Altered negative BOLD responses in the default-mode network during emotion processing in depressed subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology, New York, 34(4), 932–943.
10.1038/npp.2008.81
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Guo, X., Duan, X., Suckling, J., Chen, H., Liao, W., Cui, Q., & Chen, H. (2019). Partially impaired functional connectivity states between right anterior insula and default mode network in autism spectrum disorder. Human Brain Mapping, 40(4), 1264–1275.
10.1002/hbm.24447
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. P., Furman, D. J., Chang, C., Thomason, M. E., Dennis, E., & Gotlib, I. H. (2011). Default-mode and task-positive network activity in major depressive disorder: Implications for adaptive and maladaptive rumination. Biological Psychiatry, 70(4), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.003
10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.003
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Han, K.-M., De Berardis, D., Fornaro, M., & Kim, Y.-K. (2019). Differentiating between bipolar and unipolar depression in functional and structural MRI studies. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 91, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.03.022
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.03.022
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Han, S., He, Z., Duan, X., Tang, Q., Chen, Y., Yang, Y., … Chen, H. (2018). Dysfunctional connectivity between raphe nucleus and subcortical regions presented opposite differences in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 92, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.017
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.017
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Han, S., Wang, X., He, Z., Sheng, W., Zou, Q., Li, L., … Chen, H. (2019). Decreased static and increased dynamic global signal topography in major depressive disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 94, 109665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109665
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109665
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Han, S., Zong, X., Hu, M., Yu, Y., Wang, X., Long, Z., … Chen, H. (2017). Frequency-selective alteration in the resting-state corticostriatal-thalamo-cortical circuit correlates with symptoms severity in first-episode drug-naive patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 189, 175–180.
10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.019
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hellyer, P. J., Shanahan, M., Scott, G., Wise, R. J. S., Sharp, D. J., & Leech, R. (2014). The control of global brain dynamics: Opposing actions of frontoparietal control and default mode networks on attention. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34(2), 451–461.
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1853-13.2014
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hibar, D. P., Westlye, L. T., van Erp, T. G., Rasmussen, J., Leonardo, C. D., Faskowitz, J., … Agartz, I. (2016). Subcortical volumetric abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Molecular Psychiatry, 21(12), 1710–1716.
10.1038/mp.2015.227
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Lewis, L., & Vornik, L. A. (2003). Perceptions and impact of bipolar disorder: How far have we really come? Results of the National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association 2000 survey of individuals with bipolar disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64(2), 161–174.
10.4088/JCP.v64n0209
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hutchison, R. M., Thilo, W., Gati, J. S., Stefan, E., & Menon, R. S. (2013). Resting-state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques. Human Brain Mapping, 34(9), 2154–2177.
10.1002/hbm.22058
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hutchison, R. M., Womelsdorf, T., Allen, E. A., Bandettini, P. A., Calhoun, V. D., Corbetta, M., … Gonzalez-Castillo, J. (2013). Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations. NeuroImage, 80(1), 360–378.
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Kaiser, R. H., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Dillon, D. G., Goer, F., Beltzer, M., Minkel, J., … Pizzagalli, D. A. (2015). Dynamic resting-state functional connectivity in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41, 1822–1830. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.352
10.1038/npp.2015.352
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Kamat, S. A., Rajagopalan, K., Pethick, N., Willey, V., Bullano, M., & Hassan, M. (2008). Prevalence and humanistic impact of potential misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder among patients with major depressive disorder in a commercially insured population. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 14(7), 631–642.
10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.7.632
PubMed Google Scholar
Keck, P. E., Kessler, R. C., & Ross, R. (2008). Clinical and economic effects of unrecognized or inadequately treated bipolar disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 14(Suppl. 2), 31.
10.1097/01.pra.0000320124.91799.2a
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Martino, M., Magioncalda, P., Huang, Z., Conio, B., Piaggio, N., Duncan, N. W., … Wolff, A. (2016). Contrasting variability patterns in the default mode and sensorimotor networks balance in bipolar depression and mania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 201517558.
10.1073/pnas.1517558113
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Meda, S. A., Ruano, G., Windemuth, A., O'Neil, K., Berwise, C., Dunn, S. M., … Pearlson, G. D. (2014). Multivariate analysis reveals genetic associations of the resting default mode network in psychotic bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(19), 6864–6864.
Google Scholar
Mucha, P. J., Thomas, R., Kevin, M., Porter, M. A., & Jukka-Pekka, O. (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science, 328(5980), 876–878.
10.1126/science.1184819
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Mulders, P. C., van Eijndhoven, P. F., Schene, A. H., Beckmann, C. F., & Tendolkar, I. (2015). Resting-state functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: A review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 56, 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.07.014
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.07.014
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Murrough, J. W., Abdallah, C. G., Anticevic, A., Collins, K. A., Geha, P., Averill, L. A., … Jia-Wei, Y. G. (2016). Reduced global functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex in major depressive disorder. Human Brain Mapping, 37(9), 3214–3223.
10.1002/hbm.23235
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Murrough, J. W., Iacoviello, B., Neumeister, A., Charney, D. S., & Dan, V. I. (2011). Cognitive dysfunction in depression: Neurocircuitry and new therapeutic strategies. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 96(4), 553–563.
10.1016/j.nlm.2011.06.006
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Nixon, N. L., Liddle, P. F., Nixon, E., Worwood, G., Liotti, M., & Palaniyappan, L. (2014). Biological vulnerability to depression: Linked structural and functional brain network findings. British Journal of Psychiatry the Journal of Mental Science, 204, 283–289.
10.1192/bjp.bp.113.129965
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.
10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Nora, L., & Dimitri, V. D. V. (2015). On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest. NeuroImage, 104, 430–436.
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.007
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 242–249.
10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Pedersen, M., Omidvarnia, A., Zalesky, A., & Jackson, G. D. (2018). On the relationship between instantaneous phase synchrony and correlation-based sliding windows for time-resolved fMRI connectivity analysis. Neuroimage, 181, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.02.
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.020
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Pedersen, M., Zalesky, A., Omidvarnia, A., & Jackson, G. D. (2018). Multilayer network switching rate predicts brain performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(52), 13376–13381. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814785115
10.1073/pnas.1814785115
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Pizzagalli, D. A., Dan, I., Hallett, L. A., Ratner, K. G., & Fava, M. (2009). Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: Evidence from a probabilistic reward task. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(1), 76–87.
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.001
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Price, J. L. (2010). Comparative aspects of amygdala connectivity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 985(1), 50–58.
10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07070.x
Google Scholar
Raichle, M. E., & Snyder, A. Z. (2007). A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea. NeuroImage, 37(4), 1083–1090.
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Redlich, R., Almeida, J. J., Grotegerd, D., Opel, N., Kugel, H., Heindel, W., … Dannlowski, U. (2014). Brain morphometric biomarkers distinguishing unipolar and bipolar depression. A voxel-based morphometry-pattern classification approach. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(11), 1222.
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1100
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Redlich, R., Dohm, K., Grotegerd, D., Opel, N., Zwitserlood, P., Heindel, W., … Dannlowski, U. (2015). Reward processing in unipolar and bipolar depression: A functional MRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 40(11), 2623–2631.
10.1038/npp.2015.110
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Rive, M. M., Mocking, R. J. T., Koeter, M. W. J., Wingen, G. V., Wit, S. J. D., Heuvel, O. A. V. D., … Schene, A. H. (2015). State-dependent differences in emotion regulation between unmedicated bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(7), 687–696.
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0161
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Sakoğlu, U., Pearlson, G. D., Kiehl, K. A., Wang, Y. M., Michael, A. M., & Calhoun, V. D. (2010). A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: Application to schizophrenia. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology & Medicine, 23(5–6), 351–366.
10.1007/s10334-010-0197-8
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, T. D., Kable, J. W., Vandekar, L., Katchmar, N., Bassett, D. S., Baldassano, C. F., … Gur, R. C. (2015). Common and dissociable dysfunction of the reward system in bipolar and unipolar depression. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 40(9), 2258–2268.
10.1038/npp.2015.75
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Loughead, J., Ruparel, K., Elliott, M. A., Hakonarson, H., … Gur, R. E. (2012). Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. NeuroImage, 60(1), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., … Greicius, M. D. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–2356.
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Sheline, Y. I., Barch, D. M., Price, J. L., Rundle, M. M., Vaishnavi, S. N., Snyder, A. Z., … Raichle, M. E. (2009). The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(6), 1942–1947.
10.1073/pnas.0812686106
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Sheppes, G., Suri, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11(1), 379–405.
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112739
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Shine, J. M., Koyejo, O., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016). Temporal metastates are associated with differential patterns of time-resolved connectivity, network topology, and attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(35), 9888–9891.
10.1073/pnas.1604898113
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Siegle, G. J., Wesley, T., Carter, C. S., Steinhauer, S. R., & Thase, M. E. (2007). Increased amygdala and decreased dorsolateral prefrontal BOLD responses in unipolar depression: Related and independent features. Biological Psychiatry, 61(2), 198–209.
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.048
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Telesford, Q. K., Ashourvan, A., Wymbs, N. F., Grafton, S. T., Vettel, J. M., & Bassett, D. S. (2017). Cohesive network reconfiguration accompanies extended training. Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 4744–4759.
10.1002/hbm.23699
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Terasawa, Y., Fukushima, H., & Umeda, S. (2013). How does interoceptive awareness interact with the subjective experience of emotion? An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 34(3), 598–612.
10.1002/hbm.21458
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Whitfieldgabrieli, S., & Ford, J. M. (2012). Default mode network activity and connectivity in psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8(8), 49–76.
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143049
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Whitton, A. E., Treadway, M. T., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2015). Reward processing dysfunction in major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28(1), 7–12.
10.1097/YCO.0000000000000122
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Xiao, L., & Duyn, J. H. (2013). Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(11), 4392–4397.
10.1073/pnas.1216856110
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Yeo, B. T. T., Krienen, F. M., Jorge, S., Sabuncu, M. R., Danial, L., Marisa, H., … Polimeni, J. R. (2011). The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(3), 1125–1165.
10.1152/jn.00338.2011
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Young, K. D., Bodurka, J., & Drevets, W. C. (2016). Differential neural correlates of autobiographical memory recall in bipolar and unipolar depression. Bipolar Disorders, 18(7), 571–582.
10.1111/bdi.12441
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Zalesky, A., & Breakspear, M. (2015). Towards a statistical test for functional connectivity dynamics. NeuroImage, 114, 466–470.
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.047
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Zheng, H., Li, F., Bo, Q., Li, X., Yao, L., Yao, Z., … Wu, X. (2017). The dynamic characteristics of the anterior cingulate cortex in resting-state fMRI of patients with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 391–397.
10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.026
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume41, Issue12

August 15, 2020

Pages 3295-3304

Resting state functional network switching rate is differently altered in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder

Abstract

1 INTRODUCTION