Volume 34, Issue 9 pp. 1336-1345
SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER

Noninvasive brain stimulation for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sara M. Vacas

Sara M. Vacas

Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Florindo Stella

Corresponding Author

Florindo Stella

Laboratorio de Neurociencias LIM27, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Biosciences Institute, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Correspondence

F. Stella, Laboratorio de Neurociencias LIM27, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785, 1st Floor, Suíte 7 (1S07), CEP 05403-010, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Julia C. Loureiro

Julia C. Loureiro

Laboratorio de Neurociencias LIM27, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Frederico Simões do Couto

Frederico Simões do Couto

Dementia Study Group, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

Psychiatry and Psychology Departments, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Albino J. Oliveira-Maia

Albino J. Oliveira-Maia

Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

NOVA School of Medicine, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Orestes V. Forlenza

Orestes V. Forlenza

Laboratorio de Neurociencias LIM27, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 September 2018
Citations: 39
Sara M. Vacas and Florindo Stella contributed equally.

Abstract

Background

Pharmacological and conventional nonpharmacological treatments for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) have only modest efficacy. Furthermore, pharmacotherapy carries the risk of important side effects. Noninvasive brain stimulation (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)) are valuable and safe for cognitive function in Alzheimer disease (AD). However, there have been few studies, and there is no consensus, regarding the use of these techniques to treat BPSD.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies reporting the effect of rTMS or tDCS on BPSD.

Results

Seven articles were included: five randomized, controlled clinical trials and two open-label clinical trials. Five studies investigated the effects of rTMS and two the effects of tDCS. Both studies using tDCS reported no evidence of efficacy on BPSD, while two of the three RCTs using rTMS found statistically significant benefits. In an exploratory meta-analysis with four of the RCT studies, we did not find evidence of efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, with an overall effect of −0.02 (95% CI = −0.90, 0.94; I2 = 85%). However, when we used only the data from the studies that applied rTMS, we found a positive effect on BPSD, with an overall effect of −0.58 (95% CI = −1.02, −0.14; I2 = 0%). With regards to the adverse effects reported, these were mild and not clinically relevant.

Conclusions

Our results establish a tendency for efficacy of rTMS protocols on BPSD, while corroborating their safety and tolerability, suggesting the need for further research.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.