Volume 5, Issue 6 pp. 381-391
Original Article
Full Access

Familial risk of cancer among randomly selected cancer probands

Thomas A. Sellers

Thomas A. Sellers

Departments of Medicine, New Orleans

Louisiana State University and Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University, New Orleans

Search for more papers by this author
Robert C. Elston

Robert C. Elston

Biometry and Genetics, New Orleans

Search for more papers by this author
Cecily Stewart

Cecily Stewart

Departments of Medicine, New Orleans

Search for more papers by this author
Henry Rothschild M.D., Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Henry Rothschild M.D., Ph.D.

Departments of Medicine, New Orleans

Professor of Medicine and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112Search for more papers by this author
G. P. Vogler
First published: 1988
Citations: 23

Abstract

Several investigators have reported that relatives of lung cancer probands have a greater-than-normal likelihood for developing some form of cancer. To evaluate whether this familial risk is general for probands with cancer at any site or limited to lung cancer probands, we did a case-control study in which probands having cancer affecting any body site were identified and their pedigree data were tabulated. Telephone interviews and a mailed questionnaire were used to obtain cancer histories and environmental exposures on the families of 41 lung cancer probands, 105 probands with cancer other than lung, and 127 spouse families. Cumulative tobacco exposure (P<.05), occupational hazards (P<.005), and age of the family relatives (P<.0001) were found to be statistically significant predictors of cancer risk. With consideration given for these variables, we determined that siblings of lung cancer probands were at slightly greater risk of cancer of any kind (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43, P = .06) than siblings in the control group. Much of the elevated risk was attributable to an excess of lung cancer (OR = 2.49, P = .06). Siblings of non-lung/non-breast cancer probands were also determined to be at increased risk of lung cancer as well (OR = 1.61, P = .06). For parents, the risk was lower, although parental information may have been underreported.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.