Volume 24, Issue 3 pp. 230-239
Original Article
Full Access

Variants of developmental genes (TGFA, TGFB3, and MSX1) and their associations with orofacial clefts: A case-parent triad analysis

Astanand Jugessur

Corresponding Author

Astanand Jugessur

Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Section for Medical Statistics and Medical Birth Registry of Norway, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway===Search for more papers by this author
Rolv T. Lie

Rolv T. Lie

Section for Medical Statistics and Medical Birth Registry of Norway, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Epidemiology Branch, NIEHS, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Allen J. Wilcox

Allen J. Wilcox

Epidemiology Branch, NIEHS, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey C. Murray

Jeffrey C. Murray

Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author
Jack A. Taylor

Jack A. Taylor

Epidemiology Branch, NIEHS, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Ola D. Saugstad

Ola D. Saugstad

Department of Pediatric Research, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Hallvard A. Vindenes

Hallvard A. Vindenes

Department of Plastic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Frank Åbyholm

Frank Åbyholm

Department of Plastic Surgery, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 March 2003
Citations: 65

Abstract

We selected 262 case-parent triads from a population-based study of orofacial clefts in Norway, and examined variants of developmental genes TGFA, TGFB3, and MSX1 in the etiology of orofacial clefts. One hundred seventy-four triads of cleft lip cases (CL±P) and 88 triads of cleft palate only cases (CPO) were analyzed. There was little evidence for an association of any of these genes with CL±P. The strongest association was a 1.7-fold risk with two copies of the TGFB3-CA variant (95% CI=0.9–3.0). Among CPO cases, there was a 3-fold risk with two copies of the TGFA TaqI A2 allele, and no increase with one copy. Assuming this to be a recessive effect, we estimated a 3.2-fold risk among babies homozygous for the variant (95% CI=1.1–9.2). Furthermore, there was strong evidence of gene-gene interaction. While there was only a weak association of the MSX1-CA variant with CPO, the risk was 9.7-fold (95% CI=2.9–32) among children homozygous for both the MSX1-CA A4 allele and the TGFA A2 allele. No association of CPO with the TGFA variant was seen among the other MSX1-CA genotypes. In conclusion, no strong associations were found between CL±P and variants at these three genes. There was a possible recessive effect of the TGFA TaqI variant on the risk of CPO, with a 3-fold risk among children homozygous for the variant. The effect of this TGFA genotype was even stronger among children homozygous for the MSX1-CA A4 allele, raising the possibility of interaction between these two genes. Genet Epidemiol 24:230–239, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.