Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with t(7;21)(p22;q22)
Prabakaran Paulraj
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorSteven Diamond
Institute for Pediatric Cancer & Blood Disorders, Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, HackensackUMC, Hackensack, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorFaisal Razzaqi
Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Valley Children's Hospital, Madera, California
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco-Fresno, California
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Daniel Ozeran
Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Valley Children's Hospital, Madera, California
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco-Fresno, California
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Longhurst
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorErica F. Andersen
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorReha M. Toydemir
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Bo Hong
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Correspondence
Bo Hong, MD, University of Utah Department of Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, 115-HO1, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1221.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorPrabakaran Paulraj
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorSteven Diamond
Institute for Pediatric Cancer & Blood Disorders, Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, HackensackUMC, Hackensack, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorFaisal Razzaqi
Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Valley Children's Hospital, Madera, California
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco-Fresno, California
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Daniel Ozeran
Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Valley Children's Hospital, Madera, California
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco-Fresno, California
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Longhurst
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorErica F. Andersen
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorReha M. Toydemir
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Bo Hong
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Cytogenetics Division, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
Correspondence
Bo Hong, MD, University of Utah Department of Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, 115-HO1, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1221.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The t(7;21)(p22;q22) resulting in RUNX1-USP42 fusion, is a rare but recurrent cytogenetic abnormality associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes. The prognostic significance of this translocation has not been well established due to the limited number of patients. Herein, we report three pediatric AML patients with t(7;21)(p22;q22). All three patients presented with pancytopenia or leukopenia at diagnosis, accompanied by abnormal immunophenotypic expression of CD7 and CD56 on leukemic blasts. One patient had t(7;21)(p22;q22) as the sole abnormality, whereas the other two patients had additional numerical and structural aberrations including loss of 5q material. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on interphase cells or sequential examination of metaphases showed the RUNX1 rearrangement and confirmed translocation 7;21. Genomic SNP microarray analysis, performed on DNA extracted from the bone marrow from the patient with isolated t(7;21)(p22;q22), showed a 32.2 Mb copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) within the short arm of chromosome 11. After 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy, all three patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). One patient died due to complications related to viral reactivation and graft-versus-host disease. The other two patients achieved complete remission after HSCT. Our data displayed the accompanying cytogenetic abnormalities including del(5q) and cnLOH of 11p, the frequent pathological features shared with other reported cases, and clinical outcome in pediatric AML patients with t(7;21)(p22;q22). The heterogeneity in AML harboring similar cytogenetic alterations may be attributed to additional uncovered genetic lesions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1Paulsson K, Bekassy AN, Olofsson T, Mitelman F, Johansson B, Panagopoulos I. A novel and cytogenetically cryptic t(7;21)(p22;q22) in acute myeloid leukemia results in fusion of RUNX1 with the ubiquitin-specific protease gene USP42. Leukemia. 2006; 20: 224-229.
- 2Zagaria A, Anelli L, Coccaro N, et al. 5'RUNX1-3'USP42 chimeric gene in acute myeloid leukemia can occur through an insertion mechanism rather than translocation and may be mediated by genomic segmental duplications. Mol Cytogenet. 2014; 7: 66.
- 3Panagopoulos I, Gorunova L, Brandal P, Garnes M, Tierens A, Heim S. Myeloid leukemia with t(7;21)(p22;q22) and 5q deletion. Oncol Rep. 2013; 30: 1549-1552.
- 4Ji J, Loo E, Pullarkat S, Yang L, Tirado CA. Acute myeloid leukemia with t(7;21)(p22;q22) and 5q deletion: a case report and literature review. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2014; 3: 8.
- 5Masetti R, Togni M, Astolfi A, et al. Whole transcriptome sequencing of a paediatric case of de novo acute myeloid leukaemia with del(5q) reveals RUNX1-USP42 and PRDM16-SKI fusion transcripts. Br J Haematol. 2014; 166: 449-452.
- 6Jeandidier E, Gervais C, Radford-Weiss I, et al. A cytogenetic study of 397 consecutive acute myeloid leukemia cases identified three with a t(7;21) associated with 5q abnormalities and exhibiting similar clinical and biological features, suggesting a new, rare acute myeloid leukemia entity. Cancer Genet. 2012; 205: 365-372.
- 7Giguère A, Hébert J. Microhomologies and topoisomerase II consensus sequences near the breakpoint junctions of the recurrent t(7;21)(p22;q22) translocation in acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011; 50: 228-238.
- 8Gindina T, Barkhatov I, Boychenko E, et al. A new case of acute myeloid leukemia with semi-cryptic t(7;21)(p22;q22). Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. 2012; 16: 689-691.
- 9 F Mitelman, B Johansson, F Mertens (Eds.). Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations and Gene Fusions in Cancer (2018). http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman.
- 10Pui CH, Relling MV, Downing JR. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1535-1548.
- 11Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood. 1998; 92: 2322-2333.
- 12Lugthart S, Gröschel S, Beverloo HB, et al. Clinical, molecular, and prognostic significance of WHO type inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) and various other 3q abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3890-3898.
- 13McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2016.
- 14Foster N, Paulsson K, Sales M, et al. Molecular characterization of a recurrent, semi-cryptic RUNX1 translocation t(7;21) in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2010; 148: 938-943.
- 15Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC; 2017.
- 16Schneider RK, Schenone M, Ferreira V, et al. Rps14 haploinsufficiency causes a block in erythroid differentiation mediated by S100A8/S100A9. Nat Med. 2016; 22: 288-297.
- 17 WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and mineral nutrition information system. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2011 (WHO/NMH/NHD/MNM/11.1). http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin.pdf.
- 18Iriyama N, Hatta Y, Takeuchi J, et al. CD56 expression is an independent prognostic factor for relapse in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21). Leuk Res. 2013; 37: 1021-1026.
- 19Raspadori D, Damiani D, Lenoci M, et al. CD56 antigenic expression in acute myeloid leukemia identifies patients with poor clinical prognosis. Leukemia. 2001; 15: 1161-1164.
- 20Legrand O, Perrot JY, Baudard M, et al. The immunophenotype of 177 adults with acute myeloid leukemia: proposal of a prognostic score. Blood. 2000; 96: 870-877.
- 21Chang H, Salma F, Yi QL, Patterson B, Brien B, Minden MD. Prognostic relevance of immunophenotyping in 379 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2004; 28: 43-48.
- 22De J, Zanjani R, Hibbard M, Davis BH. Immunophenotypic profile predictive of KIT activating mutations in AML1-ETO leukemia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007; 128: 550-557.
- 23Mannelli F, Ponziani V, Bencini S, et al. CEBPA-double-mutated acute myeloid leukemia displays a unique phenotypic profile: a reliable screening method and insight into biological features. Haematologica. 2017; 102: 529-540.
- 24Gronseth CM, McElhone SE, Storer BE, et al. Prognostic significance of acquired copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2015; 121: 2900-2908.
- 25Wiemels J. Chromosomal translocations in childhood leukemia: Natural history, mechanisms, and epidemiology. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2008; 2008: 87-90.
10.1093/jncimonographs/lgn006 Google Scholar
- 26Albano F, Anelli L, Zagaria A, et al. Genomic segmental duplications on the basis of the t(9;22) rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia. Oncogene. 2010; 29: 2509-2516.
- 27Paulsson K, Haferlach C, Fonatsch C, et al. The idic(X)(q13) in myeloid malignancies: breakpoint clustering in segmental duplications and association with TET2 mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2010; 19: 1507-1514.
- 28Specchia G, Albano F, Anelli L, et al. Insertions generating the 5'RUNX1/3'CBFAT1 gene in acute myeloid leukemia cases show variable breakpoints. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004; 41: 86-91.
- 29Okuda T, Nishimura M, Nakao M, Fujita Y. RUNX1/AML1: a central player in hematopoiesis. Int J Hematol. 2001; 74: 252-257.
- 30De Braekeleer E, Douet-Guilbert N, Morel F, Le Bris MJ, Ferec C, De Braekeleer M. RUNX1translocations and fusion genes in malignant hemopathies. Future Oncol. 2011; 7: 77-91.
- 31Bidet A, Laharanne E, Achard S, Migeon M, Moreau C, Lippert E. Analysis of RUNX1 rearrangements: insights into leukaemogenesis mechanisms. Br J Haematol. 2016; 175: 738-740.
- 32Quesada V, Díaz-Perales A, Gutiérrez-Fernández A, Garabaya C, Cal S, López-Otín C. Cloning and enzymatic analysis of 22 novel human ubiquitin-specific proteases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 314: 54-62.
- 33Reyes-Turcu FE, Ventii KH, Wilkinson KD. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009; 78: 363-397.
- 34Liu LQ, Ilaria R Jr, Kingsley PD, et al. A novel ubiquitin-specific protease, UBP43, cloned from leukemia fusion protein AML1-ETO-expressing mice, functions in hematopoietic cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19: 3029-3038.
- 35Hock AK, Vigneron AM, Carter S, Ludwig RL, Vousden KH. Regulation of p53 stability and function by the deubiquitinating enzyme USP42. EMBO J. 2011; 30: 4921-4930.
- 36Hou K, Zhu Z, Wang Y, et al. Overexpression and biological function of ubiquitin-specific protease 42 in gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0152997.