Volume 11, Issue 1 2201011
Review

Research Development in the Traditional Methods and Water Flow Erosion for Natural Gas Hydrate Production: A Review

Huiru Sun

Huiru Sun

Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China

Search for more papers by this author
Bingbing Chen

Corresponding Author

Bingbing Chen

Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhenyu Zhu

Zhenyu Zhu

CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., Beijing, 100028 China

Search for more papers by this author
Lei Zhang

Lei Zhang

Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China

Search for more papers by this author
Mingjun Yang

Corresponding Author

Mingjun Yang

Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China

Search for more papers by this author
Yongchen Song

Yongchen Song

Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 November 2022

Abstract

Natural gas hydrates are considered a possible sustainable energy source. Various methods have been proposed and developed in the past few decades to exploit hydrate. The purpose of this paper is to review the research advances, application potential, and limitations of hydrate production methods, including four traditional methods (depressurization, thermal stimulation, inhibitor injection, and CO2 replacement), and novel water flow erosion. For the four traditional methods, there still exist many bottlenecks to achieve commercial hydrate production owing to a series of problems such as vast sand production, ice generation, hydrate reformation, lower energy efficiency, and huge water production. For the water flow erosion method, it can be a novel strategy to promote hydrate decomposition by introducing the chemical potential difference and accelerating mass transfer. Significantly, if the traditional methods assist with water flow erosion, the problems such as insufficient decomposition driving force and ice generation are prevented. However, there is always a gap between the experimental results and the practical application of the water flow erosion method. Therefore, future work should be undertaken to investigate the selection criteria of suitable water flow rates for different reservoirs and the ecological security of the hydrate reservoir during the water flow erosion process.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.