Early View
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Preemptive Buffering: Attachment Figure Representations Lessen the Affective Sting of Internally Generated Threats by Increasing Positive Affect

Vivian Zayas

Corresponding Author

Vivian Zayas

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Strycharz

Steve Strycharz

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Minghui Ni

Minghui Ni

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 July 2025

Funding: This work was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation Award 2234932 awarded to Vivian Zayas.

ABSTRACT

One of life's most frequently encountered stressors is internal threat, such as distressing autobiographical memories. Across six studies, we examined whether activating representations of attachment figures could preemptively buffer against the affective sting of such memory recall. Compared to neutral primes (e.g., stranger or neutral object), viewing a photograph of one's mother or romantic partner reduced negative affect following memory recall. This effect was partially mediated by spontaneously triggered positive affect. Importantly, non-attachment-based positive primes—a liked celebrity or positive object—also conferred such benefits, suggesting that positive affect itself is a key mechanism. A mega-analysis confirmed the robustness of the preemptive buffering effect for attachment figures and showed that it was moderated by attachment avoidance. These findings identify a novel route by which both close relationships and positively valenced stimuli preemptively protect against internal threats, offering new insights for research on emotion regulation, attachment theory and positive psychology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The present paper reports all studies that have been conducted to test the preemptive buffering hypothesis. All measures, manipulations, and exclusions are reported in the manuscript. The stopping rule to determine the sample size for each study was specified before any data analysis. The studies were not preregistered. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF at https://osf.io/8xbpd/.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.