Volume 43, Issue 6 pp. 516-531
Research article

Negative attributes are gendered too: Conceptualizing and measuring positive and negative facets of sex-role identity

Anja Berger

Anja Berger

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Barbara Krahé

Corresponding Author

Barbara Krahé

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

Correspondence to: Barbara Krahé, Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 August 2013
Citations: 39

Abstract

Measures of gender identity have almost exclusively relied on positive aspects of masculinity and femininity, although conceptually the self-concept is not limited to positive attributes. A theoretical argument is made for considering negative attributes of gender identity, followed by five studies developing the Positive–Negative Sex-Role Inventory (PN-SRI) as a new measure of gender identity. Study 1 demonstrated that many of the attributes of a German version of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory are no longer considered to differ in desirability for men and women. For the PN-SRI, Study 2 elicited attributes characterizing men and women in today's society, for which ratings of typicality and desirability as well as self-ratings by men and women were obtained in Study 3. Study 4 examined the reliability and factorial structure of the four subscales of positive and negative masculinity and femininity and demonstrated the construct and discriminant validity of the PN-SRI by showing that the negative masculinity and femininity scales were unique predictors of select validation constructs. Study 5 showed that the new instrument explained variance in the validation constructs beyond earlier measures of gender identity.

Key message: Even in the construction of negative aspects of gender identity, individuals prefer gender-congruent attributes. Negative masculinity and femininity make a unique contribution to understanding gender-related differences in psychological outcome variables. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.