Volume 29, Issue 1 pp. 77-84
Research Article

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) improves glycaemic control in oral hypoglycaemic agent (OHA)-treated type 2 diabetes (SMBG-OHA study)

Shin-ichi Harashima

Corresponding Author

Shin-ichi Harashima

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Shin-ichi Harashima, Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Toru Fukushima

Toru Fukushima

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Mayumi Sasaki

Mayumi Sasaki

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yuichi Nishi

Yuichi Nishi

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shimpei Fujimoto

Shimpei Fujimoto

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masahito Ogura

Masahito Ogura

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shunsuke Yamane

Shunsuke Yamane

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Daisuke Tanaka

Daisuke Tanaka

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Norio Harada

Norio Harada

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Akihiro Hamasaki

Akihiro Hamasaki

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazuaki Nagashima

Kazuaki Nagashima

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yuko Nakahigashi

Yuko Nakahigashi

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yutaka Seino

Yutaka Seino

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Nobuya Inagaki

Nobuya Inagaki

Department of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 September 2012
Citations: 18

Abstract

Background

We conducted a clinical research study to determine the effect of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycaemic control and the value of a putatively less painful blood sampling technique on SMBG in oral hypoglycaemic agent-treated type 2 diabetes patients; SMBG has not been broadly applied in non-insulin-treated patients in Japan.

Methods

One hundred thirty-seven subjects were recruited for the 24-week, prospective, comparison study and randomized into three groups: 46, no SMBG group; 46, fingertip group; and 45, palm group. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c. The secondary endpoints were SMBG compliance, dropout rate, treatment changes, and patient's and physician's satisfaction.

Results

Six subjects in the fingertip group (13.2%) and one subject in the palm group (2.2%) were dropped because of pain. A1C level of all subjects at 24-week was decreased more in the fingertip (−0.23%) and palm (−0.16%) groups than that in the no SMBG group (+0.31%) (p < 0.05). SMBG compliance was higher in the fingertip group (2.17 times/day) than that in the palm group (1.65 times/day) (p < 0.05). A1C level of treatment-unchanged subjects was decreased more in the fingertip (−0.25%) and palm (−0.21%) groups than that in the no SMBG group (+0.30%) (p < 0.05). SMBG compliance was higher in the fingertip group (2.24 times/day) than that in the palm group (1.65 times/day) (p < 0.05). Patient's questionnaire showed that 84.1% of the fingertip group and 90.2% of the palm group were satisfied with SMBG. Physician's satisfaction was higher in the palm group (94.0%) than that in the fingertip group (80.0%) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

SMBG is beneficial for glycaemic control, and palm blood sampling is a useful procedure for oral hypoglycaemic agent-treated type 2 diabetes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.