Volume 46A, Issue 2 e21427
SPECIAL ISSUE
Free to Read

L1, Lp, L2, and elastic net penalties for regularization of Gaussian component distributions in magnetic resonance relaxometry

Christiana Sabett

Christiana Sabett

Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ariel Hafftka

Ariel Hafftka

Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kyle Sexton

Kyle Sexton

Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard G. Spencer

Corresponding Author

Richard G. Spencer

Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Correspondence

R. G. Spencer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Section, MRI Core Facility for Translational Research, NIH/National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 September 2018
Citations: 13

Abstract

Determination of the distribution of magnetic resonance (MR) transverse relaxation times is emerging as an important method for materials characterization, including assessment of tissue pathology in biomedicine. These distributions are obtained from the inverse Laplace transform (ILT) of multiexponential decay data. Stabilization of this classically ill-posed problem is most commonly attempted using Tikhonov regularization with an L2 penalty term. However, with the availability of convex optimization algorithms and recognition of the importance of sparsity in model reconstruction, there has been increasing interest in alternative penalties. The L1 penalty enforces a greater degree of sparsity than L2, and so may be suitable for highly localized relaxation time distributions. In addition, Lp penalties, 1 < < 2, and the elastic net (EN) penalty, defined as a linear combination of L1 and L2 penalties, may be appropriate for distributions consisting of both narrow and broad components. We evaluate the L1, L2, Lp, and EN penalties for model relaxation time distributions consisting of two Gaussian peaks. For distributions with narrow Gaussian peaks, the L1 penalty works well to maintain sparsity and promote resolution, while the conventional L2 penalty performs best for distributions with broader peaks. Finally, the Lp and EN penalties do in fact outperform the L1 and L2 penalties for distributions with components of unequal widths. These findings serve as indicators of appropriate regularization in the typical situation in which the experimentalist has a priori knowledge of the general characteristics of the underlying relaxation time distribution. Our findings can be applied to both the recovery of T2 distributions from spin echo decay data as well as distributions of other MR parameters, such as apparent diffusion constant, from their multiexponential decay signals.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.