Volume 41, Issue 12 pp. 1611-1616
REVIEW
Free to Read

Suspicious index in Lyme carditis: Systematic review and proposed new risk score

Georgia Besant

Georgia Besant

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Douglas Wan

Douglas Wan

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Cynthia Yeung

Cynthia Yeung

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Crystal Blakely

Crystal Blakely

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Pamela Branscombe

Pamela Branscombe

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Laiden Suarez-Fuster

Laiden Suarez-Fuster

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Damian Redfearn

Damian Redfearn

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Simpson

Christopher Simpson

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Hoshiar Abdollah

Hoshiar Abdollah

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Benedict Glover

Benedict Glover

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Adrian Baranchuk

Corresponding Author

Adrian Baranchuk

Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence

Adrian Baranchuk, MD, FACC, FRCPC, FCCS, Professor of Medicine, Clinical Electrophysiology and Pacing, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 October 2018
Citations: 58
Georgia Besant and Douglas Wan shared co-authorship.

Abstract

Background

Lyme carditis (LC), an early manifestation of Lyme disease that most commonly presents as high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB), usually resolves with antibiotic treatment. When LC is not identified as the cause of AVB, a permanent pacemaker may be inappropriately implanted in a reversible cardiac conduction disorder.

Hypothesis

The likelihood that a patient's high-degree AVB is caused by LC can be evaluated by clinical characteristics incorporated into a risk stratification tool.

Methods

A systematic review of all published cases of LC with high-degree AVB, and five cases from the authors' experience, was conducted. The results informed the development of a new risk stratification tool, the Suspicious Index in LC (SILC) score. The SILC score was then applied to each case included in the review.

Results

Of the 88 cases included, 51 (58%) were high-risk, 31 (35.2%) intermediate-risk, and 6 (6.8%) low-risk for LC according to the SILC score (sensitivity 93.2%). For the subset of 32 cases that reported on all SILC variables, 24 (75%) cases were classified as high-risk, 8 (25%) intermediate-risk, and 0 low-risk (sensitivity 100%). Specificity could not be assessed (no control group). Notably, 6 of the 11 patients who received permanent pacemakers had reversal of AVB with antibiotic treatment.

Conclusion

The SILC risk score and COSTAR mnemonic (constitutional symptoms; outdoor activity; sex = male; tick bite; age < 50; rash = erythema migrans) may help to identify LC in patients presenting with high-degree AVB, and ultimately, minimize the implantation of unnecessary permanent pacemakers.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.