Volume 98, Issue 7 pp. 1211-1220
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Mortality in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cobi Adams MD

Cobi Adams MD

Department of Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia

Department of Cardiology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Maggie He MD

Maggie He MD

Department of Cardiology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Department of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ian Hughes PHD

Ian Hughes PHD

Department of Cardiology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kuljit Singh MBBS, FRACP, PHD

Corresponding Author

Kuljit Singh MBBS, FRACP, PHD

Department of Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia

Department of Cardiology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Department of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence

Kuljit Singh, Department of Medicine, Bond University, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport, QLD, 4215 Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 January 2021
Citations: 6

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive estimate for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) related mortality, and explore factors associated with an increased risk of death.

Background

SCAD is an infrequent but increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome. Despite a growing body of evidence, there have been few detailed examinations of SCAD associated mortality.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases through May 7, 2020. We included studies reporting mortality data, confirmed SCAD with coronary angiography and included ≥10 participants. We excluded non-English studies, conference abstracts, review articles and duplicate datasets. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to evaluate estimates and predictors of mortality.

Results

From an initial 1,131 articles, 34 studies with 2,817 patients were eligible for inclusion. The weighted mean age was 50 years, and 84% of participants were female. The pooled estimate for SCAD mortality was 1% (Proportion 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00–0.02). The mean duration of follow-up was 33 months. Meta-regression showed male sex was associated with 3.5-fold increased odds of mortality (OR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.22–10.03). In addition, smoking (current or previous) was associated with a 15-fold increased risk of mortality (OR 15.32; 95% CI, 2.88–81.41).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis has shown that SCAD is associated with favorable survival outcomes with an estimated mortality of 1% over a mean follow-up period of 33 months. We also found male sex and smoking were associated with an increased risk of mortality.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.