Volume 92, Issue 4 pp. 741-742
Peripheral Vascular Disease

Aortic dissection: Is the false lumen really important?

Wassim Shatila MD

Wassim Shatila MD

Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas

Department of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Zvonimir Krajcer MD

Corresponding Author

Zvonimir Krajcer MD

Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas

Department of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, CHI St. Luke's Health—Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Texas

Correspondence

Zvonimir Krajcer, MD, Texas Heart Institute, 6720 Bertner Avenue, MC 1-133, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 October 2018
Citations: 1

Key Points

  • Aortic dissection is associated with a high mortality rate and has been increasingly treated with endovascular therapy.
  • False lumen (FL) patency has been shown to be associated with worse outcomes.
  • FL interventions that incorporate the FLIRT (FL intervention to promote remodeling and thrombosis) concept have been associated with improved aortic remodeling that may confer favorable long-term outcomes.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Nothing to report.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.