Volume 92, Issue 4 pp. E271-E277
Coronary Artery Disease (E-only Articles)

Planned angiographic control versus clinical follow-up for patients with unprotected left main stem stenosis treated with second generation drug-eluting stents: A propensity score with matching analysis from the FAILS (failure in left main with second generation stents-Cardiogroup III Study)

Fabrizio D'Ascenzo MD

Corresponding Author

Fabrizio D'Ascenzo MD

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Divisione di Cardiologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

Fabrizio D'Ascenzo and Mario Iannaccone contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy. Email: [email protected] (or) www.cardiogroup.orgSearch for more papers by this author
Mario Iannaccone MD

Mario Iannaccone MD

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Divisione di Cardiologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

Fabrizio D'Ascenzo and Mario Iannaccone contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Pavani MD

Marco Pavani MD

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Divisione di Cardiologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroyoshi Kawamoto MD

Hiroyoshi Kawamoto MD

Ospedale San Raffaele Milano, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Javier Escaned Prof

Javier Escaned Prof

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ferdinando Varbella MD

Ferdinando Varbella MD

Dipartimento di Cardiologia, Ospedale degli Infermi Rivoli, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giacomo Boccuzzi MD

Giacomo Boccuzzi MD

Dipartimento di Cardiologia, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
David Hiddick-Smith MDAntonio Colombo MD

Antonio Colombo MD

Ospedale San Raffaele Milano, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Fiorenzo Gaita Prof

Fiorenzo Gaita Prof

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Divisione di Cardiologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 November 2017
Citations: 7

Contributing authors: Federico Conrotto MD, Alaide Chieffo MD, Roberto di Summa MD, Enrico Cerrato MD, Fabrizio Ugo MD, Pierluigi Omedè MD, Roberto Garbo MD, Antonio Montefusco MD, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai MD, Claudio Moretti MD, and Maurizio D'Amico MD

This article was published online on 11 November 2017. An error was subsequently identified in the Author line. This notice is included in the online and print versions to indicate that both have been corrected 16 March 2018.

Abstract

Background

The value of angiographic follow-up in unprotected left main (ULM) stenting remains undefined.

Methods

The FAILS-2 registry included consecutive patients presenting with a critical lesion of an ULM treated with second generation drug eluting stents in 6 centers from June 2007 to January 2015. Patients were stratified into two groups: those discharged with planned angiographic follow-up and those with clinical follow-up. MACE (Major Adverse Clinical Events, a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, TLR, and ST) was the primary end point, while each component was a secondary endpoint Sensitivity analysis was performed for patients treated with a provisional or a two-stent strategy. A propensity score analysis was used to compare the outcomes in the two groups.

Results

After multivariate adjustment, 220 patients per group were selected. Planned angiographic follow up was performed after a median of 7 (6–10) months. After 16 (14–21) months, rates of MACE were similar between the two groups (24 vs. 21%, P = 0.29) with lower rates of all cause and cardiovascular death in the angiographic control group (6 vs. 14%, P = 0.01 and 3 vs. 6%, P = 0.04) but with higher rates of TLR (15 vs. 5%, P < 0.001). The same trend was seen irrespective of the stent strategy.

Conclusion

planned angiographic control results in more TLR but may reduce mortality. These findings need to be confirmed by adequately powered randomized controlled trial.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None related to this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.