Volume 64, Issue 3 pp. 301-311
Valvular Heart Disease

Randomized comparison between Inoue balloon and metallic commissurotome in the treatment of rheumatic mitral stenosis: Immediate results and 6-month and 3-year follow-up

Ênio E. Guérios MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Ênio E. Guérios MD, PhD

Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitário Evangélico, Curitiba, Brazil

R. Bom Jesus, 43/02, 80035-010, Curitiba, BrazilSearch for more papers by this author
Ronaldo R.L. Bueno MD, PhD

Ronaldo R.L. Bueno MD, PhD

Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitário Evangélico, Curitiba, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah C. Nercolini MD

Deborah C. Nercolini MD

Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitário Evangélico, Curitiba, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
José C.E. Tarastchuk MD

José C.E. Tarastchuk MD

Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitário Evangélico, Curitiba, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Paulo M.P. Andrade MD

Paulo M.P. Andrade MD

Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitário Evangélico, Curitiba, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Álvaro L.A. Pacheco MD

Álvaro L.A. Pacheco MD

Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitário Evangélico, Curitiba, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Sônia Perreto MD

Sônia Perreto MD

Echocardiography Department, Hospital Universitário Evangélico, Curitiba, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 February 2005
Citations: 5

Abstract

The metallic commissurotome (MC) technique is a cheaper alternative to the Inoue balloon (IB) technique for percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV). There are no randomized trials comparing these techniques with longer follow-up of the patients. The objective of this study was to compare the immediate results and short- and medium-term follow-up of PMV using either the IB or the MC technique. Fifty patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis were randomly assigned to PMV using the IB (n = 27) or the MC (n = 23) technique. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic data. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were done 6 months and 3 years after the procedure. The success rate was 100% in the IB group and 91.3% in the MC group (P = 0.15); two patients in the latter group developed mitral regurgitation grade 3/4, requiring elective surgery. The mean final mitral valve area was bigger in the MC group (2.17 ± 0.13 vs. 2.00 ± 0.36 cm2; P = 0.04), but after 6-month and 3-year follow-up, this difference was no longer significant (2.06 ± 0.27 vs. 1.98 ± 0.38 cm2, P = 0.22, and 1.86 ± 0.32 vs. 1.87 ± 0.34 cm2, P = 0.89, respectively). This finding suggests valve stretching as an important mechanism of valve dilation with the MC. Three patients in the MC group and two patients in the IB group (P = 0.65) developed mitral valve restenosis; one of them underwent repeat PMV and the other four, all asymptomatic, were clinically followed. PMV performed either with the IB or the MC technique is effective and provides excellent short- and medium-term outcomes regardless of the technique employed. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:301–311. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.