Volume 63, Issue 4 pp. 426-432
Coronary Artery Disease

Corrected TIMI frame count: Applicability in modern digital catheter laboratories when different frame acquisition rates are used

Kunadian Vijayalakshmi MSc, MBBS, MRCP

Kunadian Vijayalakshmi MSc, MBBS, MRCP

Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Victoria J. Ashton MSc

Victoria J. Ashton MSc

School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Robert A. Wright MD, FRCP

Robert A. Wright MD, FRCP

Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
James A. Hall MA, MD, FRCP

James A. Hall MA, MD, FRCP

Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Michael J. Stewart MD, FRCP

Michael J. Stewart MD, FRCP

Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Adrian Davies BSc, FRCP

Adrian Davies BSc, FRCP

Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Mark A. de Belder MA, MD, FRCP

Corresponding Author

Mark A. de Belder MA, MD, FRCP

Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 22 November 2004
Citations: 15

Abstract

The original description of the TIMI frame count (TFC) method was based on angiograms acquired at 30 f/sec. Modern digital angiograms are acquired at lower frame rates (between 12.5 and 25 f/sec). Coronary angiography was acquired at 12.5 and 25 f/sec after 200 μg of intracoronary glyceryl trinitrate. Results of the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) at 12.5 and 25 f/sec for each vessel were: right coronary artery, 19.5 ± 5.2 and 20.4 ± 6.6 (P = 0.15); circumflex artery, 25.6 ± 8.2 and 25.9 ± 8.7 (P = 0.5); and left anterior descending artery, 22.5 ± 8.1 and 23.8 ± 10.4 (P = 0.15), respectively. The mean difference in the TFC between two injections by the same operator and by two operators was 0.4 (P = 0.7) and 0.4 (P = 0.2), respectively. The mean difference in the TFC for repeat measurements by the same observer and between two observers was 0.26 (P = 0.3) and 0.06 (P = 0.8), respectively. We confirm that the cTFC is a quantitative method to assess coronary flow that can be applied in a modern digital laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:426–432. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.