Volume 58, Issue 3 pp. 281-284
Coronary Artery Disease

Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures

Ferdinand Kiemeneij MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Ferdinand Kiemeneij MD, PhD

Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1e Oosterparkstraat 279, 1090 HM Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this author
Bhavesh U. Vajifdar MD

Bhavesh U. Vajifdar MD

Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Simon C. Eccleshall

Simon C. Eccleshall

Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
GertJan Laarman MD, PhD

GertJan Laarman MD, PhD

Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ton Slagboom MD

Ton Slagboom MD

Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ron van der Wieken MD

Ron van der Wieken MD

Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2003
Citations: 120

Abstract

Radial artery spasm is a frequent complication of the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Recently, we have been able to quantify spasm using the automatic pullback device. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an intra-arterial vasodilating cocktail in reducing the incidence and severity of radial artery spasm. A hundred patients undergoing coronary procedures via the radial artery were divided into two groups of 50 each. Patients in group A received intra-arterial cocktail (5 mg of verapamil plus 200 μg nitroglycerine in 10 ml of normal saline), while patients in group B did not receive any vasodilating drug. The pullback device was used for sheath removal at the end of the procedure. Seven (14%) patients in group A experienced pain (i.e., pain score of III–V) during automatic sheath removal, as compared to 17 (34%) in group B (P = 0.019). The mean pain score was significantly lower in group A than in group B (1.7 ± 0.94 vs. 2.08 ± 1.07; P = 0.03). The maximal pullback force (MPF) was also significantly lower for group A (0.53 ± 0.52 kg; range, 0.10–3.03 kg) as compared to group B (0.76 ± 0.45 kg; range, 0.24–1.99 kg; P = 0.013). Only 4 (8%) patients in group A had an MPF value greater than 1.0 kg, suggesting the presence of significant radial artery spasm, as opposed to 11 (22%) in group B (P = 0.029). Administration of an intra-arterial vasodilating cocktail prior to sheath insertion reduces the occurrence and severity of radial artery spasm. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:281–284. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.