Volume 58, Issue 3 pp. 331-335
Coronary Artery Disease

Debulking does not benefit patients undergoing intracoronary beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis: Insights from the START trial

Theodore A. Bass MD

Corresponding Author

Theodore A. Bass MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Shands, Jacksonville, Florida

Bass, Division of Cardiology, University of Florida–Shands Jacksonville, 655 West Eighth street, Jacksonville, FL 32209Search for more papers by this author
Paul Gilmore MD

Paul Gilmore MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Shands, Jacksonville, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Martin Zenni MD

Martin Zenni MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Shands, Jacksonville, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Brett Sasseen MD

Brett Sasseen MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Shands, Jacksonville, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Savage MD

Michael Savage MD

Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Raoul Bonan MD

Raoul Bonan MD

Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Warren Laskey MD

Warren Laskey MD

University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey J. Popma MD

Jeffrey J. Popma MD

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Marco A. Costa MD, PhD

Marco A. Costa MD, PhD

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Shands, Jacksonville, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2003
Citations: 10

Abstract

Intracoronary brachytherapy has become the current treatment of choice for patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The aim of the present study was to determine whether plaque extraction using debulking techniques prior to brachytherapy would improve the outcomes of patients with ISR. Patients enrolled into the START (n = 476) and START-40 (n = 205) trials were divided into four subgroups according to their treatment assignments: debulking-radiation, debulking-placebo, balloon angioplasty (BA) radiation, and BA placebo. Patients were further divided according to their ISR lesion length: all lesions, > 15 mm, and > 19 mm. Restenosis rates were higher in placebo, nonradiated lesions undergoing debulking (52.7%) vs. BA alone (38.5%; P = 0.04). Postprocedural minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was similar among the subgroups. Outcomes were similar between debulking and BA within each therapeutic arm. MLD after debulking radiation was greater in patients with ISR > 15 mm (post-MLD was 1.9 vs. 1.7 mm; P = 0.06) but not in the placebo. Debulking radiation patients had greater MLD at follow-up, but restenosis (23.5% after debulking vs. 32.7% BA alone) and late loss (0.3 mm in both subgroups) were not statistically different. There was a trend toward higher mortality among debulked patients (3.7%) compared to BA alone (0.8%). In patients with ISR > 19 mm, four patients died following debulking radiation as compared to no death after BA (P = 0.05). Our results do not support the strategy of plaque extraction prior to intracoronary beta-radiation for ISR. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:331–335. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.